Collision Warning Apparatus

• US 20120101711A1
• Filed: 02/05/2010
• Published: 04/26/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 02/05/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: TRW Limited (Zeppelin - Stiftung der Stadt Friedrichshafen)
• Original Assignee: TRW Limited (Zeppelin - Stiftung der Stadt Friedrichshafen)
• Inventors: Tucker, Mark Richard, Reeve, John Martin, Furmston, Paul Timothy, Shooter, Carl
• Application Number:
  US13/148,116
• Publication Number:
  US 20120101711A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/300
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/66 Radar-tracking systems; Analogous systems
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/931 of land vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/9316 combined with communication equipment with other vehicles or with base stations
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/93272 in the back of the vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/93273 on the top of the vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/415 Identification of targets based on measurements of movement associated with the target
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/166 for active traffic, e.g. moving vehicles, pedestrians, bikes
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/167 Driving aids for lane monitoring, lane changing, e.g. blind spot detection

Abstract

A collision warning apparatus for a host vehicle which has stopped along a lane of a highway, comprises at least one sensor associated with the host vehicle which generates a data stream in response to radiation received from a scene rearwards of the host vehicle, a memory in which the apparatus stores a reference target data set dependent upon movement of a first vehicle within the scene in a first period of time; and processing circuitry arranged to: identify a second target vehicle moving in the scene during a second period of time subsequent to the first period of time from the data stream and to output at least target data for the identified vehicle; and process the reference target data set with the target data or data derived therefrom, to determine whether there is a risk of collision between the second target vehicle and the host vehicle. The apparatus is especially suited for use with a vehicle that is stationary by the side of a road to warn of a possible collision from a vehicle that is approaching it from the rear.

Claims

1. A collision warning apparatus for a host vehicle which has stopped along a lane of a highway, comprising:

a memory in which said apparatus stores a reference target data set dependent upon movement of a first vehicle within said scene in a first period of time;

at least one sensor associated with said host vehicle which generates a data stream in response to radiation received from a scene rearwards of said host vehicle; and

processing circuitry arranged to;

identify a second target vehicle moving in said scene during a second period of time subsequent to said first period of time from said data stream and to output at least target data for said identified vehicle, said processing circuitry further arranged to process said reference target data set with said target data to determine whether there is a risk of collision between said second target vehicle and said host vehicle.

2. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said target data includes data indicative of a position, velocity and yaw rate of said second target vehicle within the scene at a time within said second period of time.

3. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said reference data set includes data indicative of a position, velocity and yaw rate of said first vehicle within the scene at a time within said first period of time.

4. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said first vehicle is a vehicle moving within said scene rearward of said host vehicle.

5. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said first vehicle is said host vehicle prior to said host vehicle becoming stationary along a lane of a highway.

6. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 5 wherein said host vehicle includes a motion sensor and said reference data set is dependent upon the output of said motion sensor prior to the host vehicle becoming stationary.

7. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said processing circuitry is arranged to update the reference data set based on target data from a plurality of target vehicles, each target vehicle moving through said scene at different periods of time which precede a moment in time at which said reference data set is updated.

8. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 7 wherein said processing circuitry is arranged to update said reference target data set based on an average of said target data for said plurality of target vehicles.

9. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said target data comprises a plurality of sets of data, each set corresponding to a separate instant in time and indicating a path of said second target vehicle in said scene during said second period of time and its movement at a plurality of measured points along said path.

10. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said first period of time starts when said host vehicle has stopped and said apparatus is activated.

11. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said first period of time starts when said apparatus is activated before said host vehicle becomes stationary.

12. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said processing circuitry, is arranged to compare said target data with said reference target data set, and in the event that said comparison indicates that said second target vehicle is moving in a significantly different manner to a vehicle movement defined by said reference target data set, the apparatus is arranged to indicate that a collision may occur.

13. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said processing circuitry determines that said target data set and reference data set are significantly different if the data indicative of velocity in said target data exceeds that stored in said reference data set by a predetermined amount by at least one of:

(a) the yaw rate of the reference data set and

(b) the target data differ by increasing amounts.

14. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said processing circuitry is arranged to determine said risk of collision by assigning a safe region to said second target vehicle, said safe region encompassing a predicted future path of said second target vehicle through said scene and being bounded by a boundary, said predicted future path being determined with reference to said stored reference data set which defines a safe path with said processing circuitry being adapted to adjust said boundary region dependent upon the difference between said target data set and said reference target data set, and further wherein said processing circuitry is arranged to indicate a risk of collision in the event that said boundary region encompasses part of said host vehicle.

15. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 14 wherein said said safe region has a width at a given point along said safe path in a direction normal to said direction of travel that initially corresponds to half of a width of a typical lane on a highway and increases in width as second vehicle moves further away from said safe path.

16. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said reference data set includes an estimation of a position of a lane boundary in said scene and said processing circuitry determines a risk of collision if said second target vehicle has crossed said lane boundary or is likely to cross said lane boundary by predicting a future path of said second target vehicle from said target data.

17. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said processing circuitry initiates a signal to indicate a risk of collision when a risk of collision is identified.

18. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 17 wherein said signal activates various warning systems.

38. A collision warning apparatus according to claim 12 wherein said processing circuitry determines that said target data set and reference data set are significantly different if the data indicative of velocity in said target data exceeds that stored in said reference data set by a predetermined amount or by at least one of:

(a) the yaw rate of the reference data set and

(b) the target data differ by increasing amounts.

19. A method of collision warning for a host vehicle which has stopped along a lane of a highway, comprising:

storing a reference target data set dependent upon movement of a first vehicle within a scene in a first period of time;

generating a data stream in response to radiation received from said scene rearwards of said host vehicle;

identifying a second target vehicle moving in the scene during a second period of time subsequent to said first period of time from said data stream and outputting at least target data for said second target vehicle; and

processing said reference target data set with said target data to determine whether there is a risk of collision between said second target vehicle and said host vehicle.

20. A method according to claim 19 wherein said target data includes data indicative of a position, velocity and yaw rate of said second target vehicle within said scene at a time within said second period of time.

21. A method according to claim 19 wherein said reference data set includes data indicative of a position, velocity and yaw rate of said first target vehicle within said scene at a time within said first period of time.

22. A method according to claim 21 which further includes generating said reference data set from a movement of said first vehicle which is a vehicle moving within said scene rearward of said host vehicle.

23. A method according to claims 19 wherein said first vehicle within said scene is said host vehicle prior to becoming stationary along a lane of a highway.

24. A method according to claim 23 wherein said host vehicle includes a motion sensor and said method further includes producing a reference data set that is dependent upon an output of said motion sensor prior to said host vehicle becoming stationary.

25. A method according to claim 19 which further includes updating said reference data set based on target data from a plurality of target vehicles, each target vehicle moving through said scene at different periods of time which precede a current moment in time at which said reference data set is updated.

26. A method according to claim 25 which further includes updating said reference target data set based on an average of target data for said plurality of target vehicles.

27. A method according to claim 20 wherein said target data includes a plurality of sets of data, each determined at separate instants in time and indicating the path of said second target vehicle in said scene during said second period of time and its movement at a plurality of points along that path.

28. A method according to claim 19 wherein said first period of time starts when said host vehicle has stopped and said apparatus is activated.

29. A method according to claims 19 wherein said first period of time starts when said apparatus is activated before said host vehicle becomes stationary.

30. A method according to claim 19 which further includes comparing said target data with said reference target data set, and in the event that said comparison indicates that said second target vehicle is moving in a significantly different manner to said vehicle movement defined by said reference target data set indicating that a collision may occur.

31. A method according to claim 30 further including determining that said data is significantly different in at least one of the following cases:

(a) that the data indicative of velocity in said target data exceeds that stored in said reference data set by a predetermined amount; and

(b) that the data is indicative of yaw rate in the target data set differs from the yaw rate of the reference data set by increasing amounts.

32. A method according to claim 19 further including determining the risk of collision by assigning a safe region to said second target vehicle, said safe region encompassing a predicted future path of said second target vehicle through said scene and being bounded by a boundary, said predicted future path being determined with reference to said stored reference data set which defines a safe path, and adjusting said safe boundary region dependent upon the a difference between said target data set and said reference target data set, and further in which the method includes indicating a risk of collision in the event that said boundary region encompasses part of said host vehicle.

33. A method according to claim 32 wherein a width of said safe region at a given point along a safe path in a direction normal to a direction of travel initially corresponds to half a width of a typical lane on a highway and increases in width as said difference increases.

34. A method according to claim 19 which reference data set includes an estimation of the position of a lane boundary in said scene and a determination of a risk of collision if said second target vehicle has crossed a lane boundary or is likely to cross a lane boundary by predicting a future path of said second target vehicle from said target data.

35. A method according to claim 19 further including initiating a signal to indicate a risk of collision when a risk of collision is identified.

36. (canceled)

37. (canceled)