METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ASSESSING BATTERY STATE OF HEALTH

• US 20120105069A1
• Filed: 11/01/2010
• Published: 05/03/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 11/01/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations Incorporated (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Inventors: Wang, John S., Liu, Ping, Soukiazian, Souren, Verbrugge, Mark W., Wang, Shuoqin
• Granted Patent: US 8,680,815 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 324/427
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/392 Determining battery ageing or deterioration, e.g. state of health

Abstract

A method for monitoring a lithium-ion battery cell includes monitoring a battery cell voltage and a corresponding charge capacity of the battery cell during an electric power event which may include either an electric power charge event or an electric power discharge event. A measured charge-capacity-derivative is determined by differentiating the charge capacity in relation to the corresponding battery cell voltage during the electric power event. The measured charge-capacity-derivative is compared with a preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of an anode charge curve (for electric power discharge events) or an anode discharge curve (for electric power charge events), and with a preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of a cathode charge curve (for electric power charge events) or a cathode discharge charge curve (for electric power discharge events). A first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode curve is determined. And, a second state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode curve is determined.

Claims

1. Method for monitoring a lithium-ion battery cell, comprising:

monitoring battery cell voltage and a corresponding charge capacity of the battery cell during an electric power event comprising one of an electric power charge event and an electric power discharge event;

determining a measured charge-capacity-derivative by differentiating the charge capacity in relation to the corresponding battery cell voltage during the electric power event;

comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with a preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of an anode curve;

comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with a preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of a cathode curve;

determining a first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode curve; and

determining a second state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode curve.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein:

said electric power event comprises an electric power discharge event;

said anode curve comprises an anode charge curve; and

said cathode curve a cathode discharge curve.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises:

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative; and

determining a total measured anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve;

and

determining a preferred total anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative;

wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises determining a total graphite anode capacity by comparing the total measured anode capacity and the preferred total anode capacity.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises:

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative;

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative; and

determining a shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises determining a magnitude of lithium loss and total capacity loss of the battery cell corresponding to the shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

7. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve comprises:

determining a charge-capacity-derivative for a cathode voltage response based upon the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative; and

comparing the charge-capacity-derivative for the cathode voltage response with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative.

8. The method of claim 2, wherein the electric power discharge event comprises a discharge of the battery cell from a state of charge greater than 80% to a state of charge less than 20%.

9. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with an anode charge-capacity-derivative of an anode charge curve for a new battery cell, the anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the anode against a lithium electrode during a discharge event of the new battery cell.

10. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve comprises comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with a cathode charge-capacity-derivative of a cathode discharge curve for a new battery cell, the cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the cathode against a lithium electrode during a discharge event of the new battery cell.

11. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve comprises integrating the measured charge-capacity-derivative, integrating the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve, and comparing the integrated measured charge-capacity-derivative with the integrated preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode discharge curve.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein:

said electric power event comprises an electric power charge event;

said anode curve comprises an anode discharge curve; and

said cathode curve comprises a cathode charge curve.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises:

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative; and

determining a total measured anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative.

14. The method of claim 13, further comprising

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve;

and

determining a preferred total anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative;

wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises determining a total graphite anode capacity by comparing the total measured anode capacity and the preferred total anode capacity.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises:

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative;

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured charge-capacity-derivative; and

determining a shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises determining a magnitude of lithium loss and total capacity loss of the battery cell corresponding to the shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

17. The method of claim 12, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode charge curve comprises:

determining a charge-capacity-derivative for a cathode voltage response based upon the comparison of the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative; and

comparing the charge-capacity-derivative for the cathode voltage response with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative.

18. The method of claim 12, wherein the electric power charge event comprises a charge of the battery cell from a state of charge less than 20% to a state of charge greater than 80%.

19. The method of claim 12, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with an anode charge-capacity-derivative of an anode discharge curve for a new battery cell, the anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode discharge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the anode against a lithium electrode during a charge event of the new battery cell.

20. The method of claim 12, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode charge curve comprises comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with a cathode charge-capacity-derivative of a cathode charge curve for a new battery cell, the cathode charge-capacity-derivative of the cathode charge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the cathode against a lithium electrode during a charge event of the new battery cell.

21. The method of claim 12, wherein comparing the measured charge-capacity-derivative with the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises integrating the measured charge-capacity-derivative, integrating the preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve, and comparing the integrated measured charge-capacity-derivative with the integrated preferred anode charge-capacity-derivative of the anode charge curve.