METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE RELATIVE POSE OF AN IMPLANT AND A BONE OF A CREATURE

• US 20120106819A1
• Filed: 04/23/2010
• Published: 05/03/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 04/25/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Siemens Healthineers AG (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Siemens AG
• Inventors: Fernandez Oca, Alberto
• Granted Patent: US 8,660,331 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 382/132
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/102 Modelling of surgical devices, implants or prosthesis
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/104 Modelling the effect of the tool, e.g. the effect of an implanted prosthesis or for predicting the effect of ablation or burring
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/105 Modelling of the patient, e.g. for ligaments or bones
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/107 Visualisation of planned trajectories or target regions
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/108 Computer aided selection or customisation of medical implants or cutting guides
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2090/3764 with a rotating C-arm having a cone beam emitting source
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 34/10 Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations

Abstract

A method and a system assess a relative pose of an implant and a bone of a patient. The method includes: acquiring multiple medical X-ray images of the bone with the implant preliminarily mounted to the bone; providing a database of virtual 3D implant models and selecting the implant used; fitting the virtual implant to the medical X-ray image; selecting a bone model; and fitting the chosen bone model to the medical X-ray image. The system and method now allow directly in the operation room to assess the relative pose of the implant and the bone/bone fragments by a comparison of the medical image and the respective virtual image both having the same orientation in view. The resulting image is an image of the matching virtual 2D image of the implant used and the real medical image taken from the C-arm X-ray device.

Claims

1-16. -16. (canceled)

17. A method for assessing a relative pose of an implant and a bone of a patient, which comprises the steps of:

a) acquiring at least one medical X-ray image of the bone with the implant preliminarily mounted to the bone;

b) providing a database of virtual 3D implant models and selecting the implant for use;

c) fitting a virtual implant to the medical X-ray image;

d) selecting a bone model; and

e) fitting the bone model chosen to the medical X-ray image.

18. The method according to claim 17,

b1) wherein by selecting the implant used a selection is made from a set of virtual 2D images of the implant used, each of the virtual 2D images being a reproduction of a virtual 3D implant model and a virtual 3D bone model taken from a different pose;

b2) generating intermediate pose virtual 2D images of the implant for better fine-tuning of the fitting step;

c1) fitting the virtual implant by comparing the medical X-ray image to a set of virtually generated images in order to identify at least one virtual image showing a match of a pose of the 3D implant model in the medical image with the implant in the virtual image and aligning and visualizing the medical X-ray image with an identified matching virtual image, thereby linking the pose of the at least one medical X-ray image and a 3D pose of the virtual 3D implant model; and

e1) inserting at least one of virtual screws or other attachments for fixing the virtual implant according to an actual position of a real implant and comparing at least one of an orientation or a position of the virtual screws or the other attachments with a desired position of real screws prior to insertion into the bone of the patient.

19. The method according to claim 18, which further comprises carrying out the step of comparing in c1) by a comparison of an indicative structure feature of the implant in the at least one medical X-ray image to a corresponding indicative structure feature of the implant in the plurality of virtual images.

20. The method according to claim 18, which further comprises carrying out the step of comparing in c1) by a pixel-wise comparison of the at least one medical X-ray image to the plurality of virtual images.

21. The method according to claim 19, wherein an identified matching virtual image is the virtual image out of the plurality of virtual images having achieved a maximum number of congruent pixels during a comparison.

22. The method according to claim 19, wherein an identified matching virtual image is the image out of the plurality of virtual images having achieved a number of congruent pixels during a comparison exceeding a predetermined threshold of congruent pixels.

23. The method according to claim 17, which further comprises:

performing one of;

calculating the bone model directly from a CT scan of the bone of interest;

or

calculating and mirroring the bone model directly from the CT scan of a contralateral side in case the bone of interest is fractured and bone fragments are displaced or the bone model is taken from a database of statistical bone models.

24. The method according to claim 17, which further comprises accelerating the fitting step via knowledge of a C-arm projection geometry which can be determined by a calibration step.

25. A system for assessing a relative pose of an implant and a bone of a patient, the system comprising:

a medical imaging device for acquiring at least one medical X-ray image of the bone with the implant preliminarily mounted to the bone;

a database containing virtual 3D implant models and means for selecting the implant in use;

a calculation device for fitting the virtual implant to the medical X-ray image;

means for selecting a bone model; and

said calculation device enabled to fit the bone model chosen to the medical X-ray image.

26. The system according to claim 25, wherein:

by selecting the implant used a selection is made out of said database having virtual true to real world scale 3D implant models of a set of virtual 2D images of the implant used, each of the virtual 2D images being a reproduction of the virtual 3D implant model and a virtual 3D bone model taken from a different pose and generating intermediate pose virtual 2D images of the implant used for better fine-tuning;

said computing device for performing the fitting compares the medical X-ray image to a set of virtually generated images to identify at least one virtual image showing a match of the pose of the 3D implant model in the medical X-ray image with the implant in the virtual image and said computing device aligning and visualizing the medical X-ray image with an identified matching virtual image, thereby linking the pose of the at least one medical X-ray image and the 3D pose of the 3D implant model; and

said computing device inserting at least one of virtual screws or other attachments for fixing the virtual implant according to an actual position of a real implant and comparing at least one of an orientation or a position of the virtual screws or the other attachments with a desired position of real screws prior to their insertion into the bone of the patient.

27. The system according to claim 26, wherein a comparison is carried out by a comparison of an indicative structure feature of the implant in the at least one medical X-ray image to a corresponding indicative structure feature of the implant in the plurality of virtual images.

28. The system according to claim 26, wherein a comparison is carried out by a pixel-wise comparison of the at least one medical X-ray image to a plurality of virtual images.

29. The system according to claim 27, wherein an identified matching virtual image is the image out of the plurality of virtual images having achieved a maximum number of congruent pixels during the comparison.

30. The system according to claim 27, wherein an identified matching virtual image is at least one image out of the plurality of virtual images having achieved a number of congruent pixels during the comparison exceeding a predetermined threshold of congruent pixels.

31. The system according to claim 25, wherein the bone model is calculated directly from a CT scan of the bone of interest or is calculated and mirrored from the CT scan of a contra-lateral side in a case the bone of interest is fractured and bone fragments are displaced or the bone model is taken from a database of statistical bone models.

32. The system according to claim 25, wherein the fitting step is accelerated via knowledge of a C-arm projection geometry which can be determined by a calibration step.