MECHANISM FOR EFFICIENTLY MATCHING TWO OR MORE ENTITIES BASED ON MUTUAL BENEFIT

• US 20120130836A1
• Filed: 11/17/2011
• Published: 05/24/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 11/18/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Svetlana B. Belykh, William A. Asperi
• Original Assignee: Svetlana B. Belykh, William A. Asperi
• Inventors: Asperi, William A., Belykh, Svetlana B.
• Application Number:
  US13/299,209
• Publication Number:
  US 20120130836A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/26.1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0601 Electronic shopping [e-shopping]

Abstract

The present inventive concept is generally directed to a computer-based system and associated methods for facilitating business referrals, matching consumers with compatible providers of goods and/or services. In an embodiment, the system comprises a business-referral website through which consumers can place bids for any product or service whatsoever. In an embodiment, there are functional modules designed to serve the following actors: Consumers, Goods/Service Providers, System Administrators, and sales/Marketing Agents. The system allows Consumers who are looking for a particular good or service to publish a “Bid” within the system, which in turn will logically match the Consumer offering with one or more Providers based on the Consumer-offer details; that is, product/service category and description, geographical area for delivery of the needed goods/services, and the offered price. Matched Providers are given the opportunity to electronically respond to the Consumer offer by accepting, rejecting, requesting more information, or counter-offering.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for facilitating transactions, comprising the steps of:

receiving, at a server computer system, an offer from a first user via a first client computing system that is communicatively coupled with said server computer system; and

by said server computer system, matching said first user offering with at least one second user'"'"'s offerings, said second-user offerings stored within said server computer system.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein said matching is based on a plurality of criteria, including:

at least one first-user-requested category of goods and/or services, as compared to said second user'"'"'s offering of goods and/or services;

at least one first-user-selected, server-computer-system predefined, geographical location, as compared to said second user'"'"'s geographical territory for offering goods and/or services, as recorded within said server computer system; and

a price offering, as compared to said second user'"'"'s minimum acceptable price, as recorded with said server computer system.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

by said server computer system, after a match between said first user'"'"'s offerings and said second user'"'"'s offerings is found, sending an electronic notification to said second user,

wherein said notification provides said second user with said first user'"'"'s offer details, and

wherein said notification provides an means for said second user to electronically respond to said first-user offer; and

by said second user, on a second client computing system, electronically communicating a response to said server computer system.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein said electronic communication of said second-user response is selected from the group consisting of e-mail, SMS messaging, telephonic communications, and website access.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein said response is of a type selected from the group consisting of ‘

Accept’

, ‘

Counter’

, ‘

Request More Information’

, and ‘

Reject’

.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, further comprising the step of:

by said server computer system, if said second user has responded by accepting (‘

Accept’

), making a counter offer (‘

Counter’

), or requesting more information (‘

Request More Information’

), then sending an electronic notification to said first user, wherein said notification provides said first user with said second user'"'"'s acceptance, request for more information, or counter offer details.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein said second-user electronic notification is sent to all second users identified by said server computer system.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein said second-user electronic notification is sent to a subset of all second users matched by said server computer system, said subset determined randomly by said server computer system.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein said second-user electronic notification for each subsequent first-user offering involving the same category of goods and/or services is sent to a different subset of all second users matched by said server computer system until all matched second users have had an opportunity to respond to a first-user offering.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein if a second user pays a predetermined premium-membership fee, then said server computer system is programmed to increase the odds that said premium-member second user will be selected in said random selection for electronic notification of a first-user offering.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein each said second user is assigned a billing group from a predetermined set of billing groups in said server computer system, each billing group defining a different limit to the number of potential competitors a second user must compete with in responding to any first-user offering, said method further comprising the step of:

by said server computer system, automatically charging said second user charged a predetermined fee, according to said billing group pay scale, for each match with a first-user offering.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein said second-user billing group is selected from a group consisting of a three-competitors group, a five-competitors group, and an unlimited competitors group.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein:

said server computer system is programmed to accumulate and calculate an overall performance rating for individual second users based on electronically submitted feedback from first users regarding experiences with individual second users; and

said performance rating is assigned according to a predetermined quantitative scale;

said method further comprising the step of;

if said second user'"'"'s overall performance rating is greater or equal to a predetermined threshold, based on a plurality of different first-user ratings, and if the total number of said first-user ratings are greater than or equal to a predetermined threshold, then before said matching step, allowing said second user to select inclusion into a preferred limited-competition billing group.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, further comprising the step of:

if said second user is assigned a billing group for which said server computer system has programmatically blocked said second user from responding to a first-user offering, then allowing said second user to change the billing group and related fee schedule for said second user in order to allow said second user'"'"'s participation in said first-user offering.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, further comprising the steps of:

allowing said second user to modify said second user'"'"'s matching criteria, as recorded within said server computer system;

by said second user, modifying said second user'"'"'s matching criteria, as recorded within said server computer system; and

by said server computer system, making all still active first-user offerings that match said second user, based on said modified matching criteria, available to said second user for response.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of, before said charging step:

by said server computer system, determining which billing group a second user is assigned; and

by said server computer system, if said first-user offering is rejected by said second user, then reduce said pay scale by a predetermined amount or percentage.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of, before said charging step:

by said server computer system, determining whether said first-user offering has a rejected status as a result of expiration past a predetermined time period, or if said first-user offering is rejected by said second user, and if so, then

by said server computer system, reducing said second user'"'"'s pay scale by a predetermined value or percentage.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of, before said charging step:

by said server computer system, determining whether said first-user offering has a belated status as a result of said server computer system detecting that enough affirmative responses;

that is, accepting (‘

Accept’

), making a counter offer (‘

Counter’

), or requesting more information (‘

Request More Information’

);

for said first-user offering have already been received according to a predetermined threshold, and if so, then

by said server computer system, allowing said second user to accept an opportunity to move to a billing group with a higher number of competitors and with a correspondingly lower fee.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of, before said charging step:

by said server computer system, determining whether said first-user offering has a declined status as a result of said server computer system detecting that enough affirmative responses;

that is, accepting (‘

Accept’

), making a counter offer (‘

Counter’

), or requesting more information (‘

Request More Information’

);

for said first-user offering have already been received according to a predetermined threshold, then

by said server computer system, allowing said second user to decline an opportunity to move to a billing group with a higher number of competitors and with a correspondingly lower fee, and thereby causing said second user to receive a full refund of corresponding fees that have been paid.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein said first user'"'"'s offer comprises an activity selected from the group consisting of:

seeking an employment opportunity;

providing an offer to perform a temporary task that is subject to contract renewal;

providing an offer to enter into business with one or more second users;

providing an offer to purchase real estate; and

seeking dating companionship.

21. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein said first user'"'"'s offer is based on the primary professional expertise or secondary skills of said first user.