ADJUSTABLE PRIORITY RETAILER RANKING SYSTEM

• US 20120130917A1
• Filed: 11/24/2010
• Published: 05/24/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 11/24/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Adtile Technologies Inc.
• Original Assignee: Modified Systems, LLC
• Inventors: Forsblom, Nils
• Application Number:
  US12/953,917
• Publication Number:
  US 20120130917A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/347
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0282 Rating or review of business operators or products
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0625 Directed, with specific intent or strategy

Abstract

An adjustable priority retailer ranking system that performs a method for generating an ordered comparison list of merchant sources is disclosed. A first unordered list of merchant sources is received from a queried search engine. A location value of an end user is derived. For the merchant sources in the unordered list, a plurality user independent merchant evaluation factors are retrieved, and a plurality of user-independent merchant evaluation factors are generated based upon the location value. Predetermined weights are assigned to the merchant evaluation factors. A merchant ranking score for the merchant sources are generated from a composite of the weights and the merchant evaluation factors. An ordered list of merchant sources arranged according to the ranking scores is outputted to the end user.

Claims

1. A method for generating an ordered comparison list of merchant sources from a query for a product, the method comprising:

receiving a first unordered list of merchant sources generated by a search engine in response to the search query thereto for the product, the search query being initiated by an end user;

deriving a location value for the end user;

retrieving values of a plurality of user-independent merchant evaluation factors for each of the merchant sources in the first unordered list;

generating values of a plurality of user-dependent merchant evaluation factors for each of the merchant sources in the first unordered list based upon the derived location value for the end user;

assigning predetermined weights to each of the plurality of user-independent merchant evaluation factors and user-dependent merchant evaluation factors;

generating a merchant ranking score for each of the merchant sources in the first unordered list from a composite of the predetermined weights and the respective user-independent merchant evaluation factors and user-dependent merchant evaluation factors; and

outputting to the end user an ordered list of merchant sources arranged according to the generated merchant ranking score associated with the respective merchant sources.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein a one of the plurality of user-independent merchant evaluation factors is selected from a group consisting of:

a price of the queried product, a stock status of the queried product, a description qualitative rating, a description language rating, an image qualitative rating, and a merchant rating value.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the description qualitative rating for a given one of the merchant sources is generated by a scoring system analyzing the content of a description associated with the queried item as provided by the given one of the merchant sources.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the description language rating for a given one of the merchant sources corresponds to the number of different languages in which a description associated with the queried item by the given one of the merchant sources is provided.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the image qualitative rating for a given one of the merchant sources corresponds to an average file size in which images associated with the queried item by the given one of the merchant sources is provided.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein a one of the plurality of user-dependent merchant evaluation factors is selected from a group consisting of:

a shipping cost for the queried product, a shipping time for the queried product, an environmental impact value associated with shipping the queried product, and a currency value.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of deriving the location value for the end user further includes:

retrieving a pre-stored geographical address from an account associated with the end user; and

assigning the pre-stored geographical address as the location value.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of deriving the location value for the end user further includes:

deriving a general geographic location from a network address associated with the end user; and

assigning the general geographic location as the location value.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the merchant ranking score of a given one of the merchant sources is relative to the merchant ranking scores of the other merchant sources in the first unordered list.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined weights are set by the end user with an interface including an display of each of the user-independent merchant evaluation factors and user-dependent merchant evaluation factors with an interface element for quantifying the relative importance to the end user along a scale.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the quantified relative importance to the end user is a numerical value between one and five.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the predetermined weights are assigned default values.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the ordered list of merchant sources is generated as a web page rendered by a browser application.

14. An article of manufacture comprising a program storage medium readable by a computer, the medium tangibly embodying one or more programs of instructions executable by the computer to perform a method for generating an ordered comparison list of merchant sources from a search query for a product, the method comprising:

receiving a first unordered list of merchant sources generated by a search engine in response to the search query thereto for the product, the search query being initiated by an end user;

deriving a location value for the end user;

retrieving values of a plurality of user-independent merchant evaluation factors for each of the merchant sources in the first unordered list;

generating values of a plurality of user-dependent merchant evaluation factors for each of the merchant sources in the first unordered list based upon the derived location value for the end user;

assigning predetermined weights to each of the plurality of user-independent merchant evaluation factors and user-dependent merchant evaluation factors;

generating a merchant ranking value for each of the merchant sources in the first unordered list from a composite of the predetermined weights and the respective user-dependent merchant evaluation factors and user-independent merchant evaluation factors; and

outputting to the end user an ordered list of merchant sources arranged according to the generated merchant ranking value associated with the respective merchant sources.