AUTOMATED TREATMENT PLANNING FOR RADIATION THERAPY

• US 20120136194A1
• Filed: 08/17/2011
• Published: 05/31/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 08/17/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Board of Regents of the University of Texas System (University of Texas System)
• Original Assignee: Board of Regents of the University of Texas System (University of Texas System)
• Inventors: Zhang, Xiaodong, Pan, Xiaoning, Li, Yupeng, Li, Xiaoqiang, Mohan, Radhe
• Granted Patent: US 8,986,186 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/1
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 2005/1041 using a library of previously administered radiation treatment applied to other patients
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 2005/1087 Ions; Protons
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 5/103 Treatment planning systems
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 5/1031 using a specific method of dose optimization
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 5/1047 with movement of the radiation head during application of radiation, e.g. for intensity modulated arc therapy or IMAT

Abstract

This patent generally relates to developing treatment plans for use in external beam radiation therapy, and more particularly to a method, a system and a computer readable media that contains programming for the development of external beam radiation therapy treatment plans. Embodiments of the invention include (1) automatically setting beam angles based on a beam angle automation algorithm, (2) judiciously designing planning structures and (3) automatically adjusting the objectives of the objective function based on a parameter automation algorithm.

Claims

1. A method of forming a treatment plan for treating a patient with radiation therapy, the method comprising:

receiving information corresponding to a tumor position in the patient determined using an imaging device;

selecting a plurality of beam angles for a respective plurality of beams based on the tumor position;

receiving information corresponding to a plurality of constrained and unconstrained objective function parameters related to at least one of a minimum and maximum radiation dosage to a specific region of interest;

selecting an intensity for each beam based, in part, on the objective function parameters;

selecting new unconstrained objective function parameters based, in part, on the previous unconstrained objective function parameters; and

selecting new beam intensities based, in part, on the new unconstrained objective function parameters.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the new beam intensities are selected more than twice.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of beams are used to treat a patient in need of radiation therapy.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of beam angles are selected using an expert system.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the expert system includes information on a plurality of patients'"'"' tumor position, tumor size, general tumor site and beam angles used to treat the tumor position.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the tumor position is the relative coordinate between the marked iso-center of a tumor and the center of a planning target volume.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the objective function parameter is represented by an objective function parameter value calculated using EUD, TCP, NTCP, dose and dose-volume.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the method additionally comprises removing at least one beam and selecting new beam intensities for the remaining beams.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the method additionally comprises comparing the treatment plan before and after removing the at least one beam angle;

and adding the removed beam angle back into the treatment plan if the selected new beam intensities results in a total objective function value greater than a previous total objective function value.

10. The method of claim 4, wherein beam angles are selected using expert system beam angles used to treat a tumor location in a patient in the expert system who has the closest tumor location to the tumor position.

11. The method of claim 4, wherein the selected beam angles are selected from beam angles with the highest frequency distribution in a set of patients in the expert system with tumor locations in the general organ location of the tumor position.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the treatment plan comprises multiple treatments.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein after a treatment within the multiple treatments, new information corresponding to the tumor position is received and new beam angles selected from the expert system.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein after a treatment within the multiple treatments, new information corresponding to the tumor position is received and new objective functional parameters are selected.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the tumor positions are represented by integrated target volume.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the method additionally comprises:

estimating the mean organ dose based on the tumor size and overlapping between tumor and normal organ;

determining if the mean organ dose is above or below a set value;

using integrated target volume tumor positions to select the functional parameters if the mean organ dose is above the set value.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the objective function parameters are selected from the group consisting of planning target volume minimum dose, planning target volume uniform dose, planning target volume maximum dose, minimum planning target dose volume, maximum planning target dose volume, organ avoidance maximum dose, maximum organ avoidance dose volume, and any combination thereof.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein constrained objection function parameters are selected from the group consisting of planning target volume minimum dose, planning target volume maximum dose, planning target volume dose, maximum normal tissue dose, maximum cord dose volume, and any combination thereof.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein the regions of interest are selected from a group consisting of the tumor location, any organ located near the tumor location, and any combination thereof.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein the radiation therapy is selected from the group consisting of intensity modulated radiation treatment, intensity modulated proton therapy treatment, and volumetric modulated arc therapy.

21. The method of claim 7, wherein selecting new unconstrained objective function parameters comprises:

calculating the objective function parameter value;

comparing the objective function parameter value to a maximum sub-objective function value; and

adjusting the value of the objective functional parameter to be less or greater than the current objective function parameter if the sub-objective function parameter value is less than the maximum sub-objective function value.

22. The method of claim 1, wherein an objective function parameter is represented by the parameters:

EUD0, dose, dose-volume, weight, and alpha.

23. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is repeated until a total objective value calculated from the sum of the individual objective function parameters is the same as or greater than a previous total objective value.

24. The method of claim 1, wherein multiple treatment plans are generated by weighing each objective functional parameter differently.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein the multiple treatment plans are IMRT plans and a final treatment plan is a VMAT plan.

26. The method of claim 24, wherein at least two of the multiple treatment plans are combined to produce a final treatment plan.

27. The method of claim 1, wherein a final treatment plan is an IMRT plan or a VMAT plan.

28. A system for generating treatment plans for radiation therapy, the system comprising a processor in communication with a memory, where the memory stores processor-executable program code and the processor is configured to be operative in conjunction with the processor-executable program code to:

receive information corresponding to a tumor position in the patient determined using an imaging device;

select a plurality of beam angles for a respective plurality of beams based on the tumor position;

receive information corresponding to a plurality of constrained and unconstrained objective function parameters related to at least one of a minimum and maximum radiation dosage to a specific region of interest;

select an intensity for each beam based, in part, on the objective function parameters;

select new unconstrained objective function parameters based, in part, on the previous unconstrained objective function parameters; and

select new beam intensities based, in part, on the new unconstrained objective function parameters.

29. The system of claim 28, further comprising selecting a best compromised plan based on multiple plans.

30. A computer readable medium comprising computer-usable program code executable to perform operations comprising:

receiving information corresponding to a tumor position in the patient determined using an imaging device;

selecting a plurality of beam angles for a respective plurality of beams based on the tumor position;

receiving information corresponding to a plurality of constrained and unconstrained objective function parameters related to at least one of a minimum and maximum radiation dosage to a specific region of interest;

selecting an intensity for each beam based, in part, on the objective function parameters;

selecting new unconstrained objective function parameters based, in part, on the previous unconstrained objective function parameters; and

selecting new beam intensities based, in part, on the new unconstrained objective function parameters.