Driver Safety Enhancement Using Intelligent Traffic Signals and GPS

• US 20120139754A1
• Filed: 01/17/2012
• Published: 06/07/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 08/11/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Green Driver, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Green Driver, Inc.
• Inventors: Ginsberg, Matthew L., Kinion, Pamela D.
• Application Number:
  US13/352,013
• Publication Number:
  US 20120139754A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/905
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/096775 where the origin of the information is a central station
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/096883 where input information is obtained using a mobile device, e.g. a mobile phone, a PDA

Abstract

A driver safety system determines a correspondence between a vehicle and an upcoming traffic signal, and predicts a state of the traffic signal when the vehicle is expected to reach the signal'"'"'s location. Based on proximity to the signal and speed of the vehicle, the system provides a warning to the vehicle if it determines that the vehicle is likely to proceed contrary to the signal (e.g., a driver is likely to run a red light). The warning becomes progressively stronger as the prediction becomes more certain.

Claims

1. A driver safety system for a mobile traffic system, the driver safety system comprising:

a vehicle route subsystem configured to predict a time of arrival of a vehicle at a traffic control;

a traffic control interaction subsystem configured to predict a state of the traffic control at the time of arrival; and

a user device interaction subsystem configured to provide a warning at the vehicle responsive to a current dynamic of the vehicle, a current distance from the vehicle to the traffic control, and the state of the traffic control at the time of arrival as predicted by the traffic control interaction subsystem.

2. The driver safety system of claim 1, further comprising a subsystem configured to determine a correspondence between the vehicle and the traffic control.

3. The driver safety system of claim 2, wherein the correspondence is determined responsive to the location of the traffic control and the location and direction of travel of the vehicle.

4. The driver safety system of claim 2, wherein the correspondence is determined responsive to a route for the vehicle.

5. The driver safety system of claim 1, wherein responsiveness of the warning to the current distance varies based on at least one of vehicle speed, applicable speed limits, presence of blind curves, time of day, and weather conditions.

6. The driver safety system of claim 1, wherein the traffic control is a traffic light.

7. The driver safety system of claim 1, wherein the warning varies over time responsive to a certainty of prediction.

8. The driver safety system of claim 1, wherein the current dynamic is at least one of speed, acceleration, deceleration, and activation of a braking system.

9. A computer-implemented method for providing a driver of a vehicle with a warning that the vehicle is predicted to violate a traffic control, the computer-implemented method comprising:

predicting a time of arrival of a the vehicle at the traffic control;

predicting a state of the traffic control at the time of arrival; and

providing a warning at the vehicle responsive to a current dynamic of the vehicle, a current distance from the vehicle to the traffic control, and the predicted state of the traffic control at the time of arrival.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, determining a correspondence between the vehicle and the traffic control.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10, wherein the correspondence is determined responsive to the location of the traffic control and the location and direction of travel of the vehicle.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 10, wherein the correspondence is determined responsive to a route for the vehicle.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein responsiveness of the warning to the current distance varies based on at least one of vehicle speed, applicable speed limits, presence of blind curves, time of day, and weather conditions.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the traffic control is a traffic light.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the warning varies over time responsive to a certainty of prediction.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the current dynamic is at least one of speed, acceleration, deceleration, and activation of a braking system.