METHOD TO DETERMINE DRIVER WORKLOAD FUNCTION AND USAGE OF DRIVER WORKLOAD FUNCTION FOR HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

• US 20120174111A1
• Filed: 12/27/2011
• Published: 07/05/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 12/30/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Denso International America Incorporated (DENSO Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Denso International America Incorporated (DENSO Corporation)
• Inventors: Pala, Silviu, Sun, Bo, Yoshida, Seishi, McBride, Justin, Rigney, Carolina
• Granted Patent: US 9,946,334 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 718/102
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/011 Arrangements for interaction with the human body, e.g. for user immersion in virtual reality blind teaching G09B21/00
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/38 for implementing user interfaces

Abstract

A method of objectively measuring a driver'"'"'s ability to operate a motor vehicle user interface. The method includes objectively measuring the driver'"'"'s ability to perform each one of a plurality of calibration tasks of various degrees of difficulty including an easy task, a medium task, and a difficult task; generating a scale with which to evaluate the driver'"'"'s ability to operate the user interface, the scale customized for the driver based on the objective measurements of the driver'"'"'s ability to perform each calibration task; objectively measuring the driver'"'"'s ability to operate a function of the motor vehicle user interface; and objectively evaluating the driver'"'"'s ability to operate the function of the motor vehicle user interface using the scale to determine if the user interface is appropriate for the driver.

Claims

1. A method of objectively measuring a driver'"'"'s ability to operate a motor vehicle user interface comprising:

objectively measuring the driver'"'"'s ability to perform each one of a plurality of calibration tasks of various degrees of difficulty including an easy task, a medium task, and a difficult task;

generating a scale with which to evaluate the driver'"'"'s ability to operate the user interface, the scale customized for the driver based on the objective measurements of the driver'"'"'s ability to perform each calibration task;

objectively measuring the driver'"'"'s ability to operate a function of the motor vehicle user interface; and

objectively evaluating the driver'"'"'s ability to operate the function of the motor vehicle user interface using the scale to determine if the user interface is appropriate for the driver.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the calibration tasks include at least one of the following:

identifying a pattern in a series of numbers presented to the driver;

identifying differences in circle size among a plurality of circles displayed to the driver; and

identifying arrows of different directions among a plurality of arrows displayed to the driver.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the driver'"'"'s ability to perform the calibration tasks is objectively measured by measuring at least one of the following for each calibration task:

total amount of time required to perform the calibration task;

amount of time that the driver'"'"'s eyes were off the road;

heart rate;

skin moisture level;

body temperature;

brain wave activity;

or eye movement.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the calibration tasks includes driving the vehicle.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the driver'"'"'s ability to perform the calibration tasks is objectively measured with a portable evaluator device including an interface, a controller, at least one physiological sensor, an eye tracking sensor, inputs for vehicle data, a display, and an audio system.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the scale consists of a range of 1-10.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the function of the motor vehicle user interface includes at least one of the following face valid tasks:

operating a radio;

operating climate control;

operating a cell phone;

or operating cruise control.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising modifying the user interface based on the objectively evaluated ability of the driver to operate the function of the user interface.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising a motor vehicle including the user interface.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a plurality of driver work functions corresponding to the driver'"'"'s ability to perform each one of the calibration tasks.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising scaling each of the driver work functions to at least reduce absolute numerical differences between the driver work functions.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the driver'"'"'s ability to operate the function of the motor vehicle user interface is objectively measured by measuring at least one of the following during operation of the function:

total amount of time required;

amount of time driver'"'"'s eyes were off the road;

heart rate;

skin moisture level;

body temperature;

brain wave activity;

or eye movement.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the driver'"'"'s ability to operate the function of the motor vehicle user interface is objectively measured with a portable evaluator device.

14. A method of objectively measuring a driver'"'"'s ability to operate a motor vehicle user interface comprising:

objectively measuring the driver'"'"'s ability to perform each one of a plurality of calibration tasks of various degrees of difficulty including a drive only task, an easy task while driving, a medium task while driving, and a difficult task while driving;

generating a scale with which to measure the driver'"'"'s ability to operate the user interface, the scale customized for the driver based on the objective measurements of the driver'"'"'s ability to perform each calibration task;

objectively measuring and evaluating the driver'"'"'s ability to operate a function of the motor vehicle user interface using the scale; and

customizing the user interface for the user based on the user'"'"'s ability to operate the function.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the driver'"'"'s ability to perform the calibration tasks is objectively measured by measuring at least one of the following for each calibration task:

total amount of time required to perform the calibration task;

amount of time that the driver'"'"'s eyes were off the road;

heart rate;

skin moisture level;

body temperature;

brain wave activity;

or eye movement.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the driver'"'"'s ability to operate the function of the motor vehicle user interface is objectively measured by measuring at least one of the following during operation of the function:

total amount of time required;

amount of time driver'"'"'s eyes were off the road;

heart rate;

skin moisture level;

body temperature;

brain wave activity;

or eye movement.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein objectively measuring the driver'"'"'s ability to perform each one of the plurality of calibration tasks includes measuring a workload required of the driver to perform the calibration tasks.

18. A method of objectively measuring a driver'"'"'s ability to operate a motor vehicle user interface comprising:

objectively measuring driver workload required to perform each one of a plurality of calibration tasks of various degrees of difficulty;

generating a scale with which to measure workload incurred by the driver during operation of the user interface, the scale personalized for the driver based on the objective measurements of the workload used by the driver during performance of the calibration tasks;

objectively measuring driver workload used by the driver to operate a function of the motor vehicle user interface;

objectively evaluating workload used by the driver to operate the function of the motor vehicle user interface; and

customizing the user interface for the driver to optimize workload used by the driver to operate the user interface.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising objectively evaluating workload used by the driver to operate a plurality of functions of the motor vehicle user interface;

and

averaging the workload used to operate each one of the plurality of functions to identify workload used by the driver to operate the motor vehicle user interface generally.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the driver workload required to perform each one of the calibration tasks is objectively measured by measuring at least one of the following for each calibration task:

total amount of time required to perform the calibration task;

amount of time that the driver'"'"'s eyes were off the road;

heart rate;

skin moisture level;

body temperature;

brain wave activity;

or eye movement.