DETECTING AND MITIGATING DENIAL OF SERVICE ATTACKS

• US 20120174220A1
• Filed: 12/31/2010
• Published: 07/05/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 12/31/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: VeriSign, Inc.
• Original Assignee: VeriSign, Inc.
• Inventors: Rodriguez, John
• Application Number:
  US12/983,179
• Publication Number:
  US 20120174220A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 726/23
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 2463/141 Denial of service attacks against endpoints in a network
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1416 Event detection, e.g. attack signature detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1425 Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1458 Denial of Service

Abstract

Embodiments of this invention provide methods for detecting a denial of service attack (DoS) and isolating traffic that relates to the attack. The method may begin by collecting network traffic data by observing individual packets carried over the network. The data may then be compiled into a time series comprising network traffic data relating successive time-intervals. A difference value based upon the entry in the time series for a large time-window and for a small time-window. A deviation score may then be determined by calculating the ratio of the difference values. The deviation score may indicate whether an attack occurred. In an embodiment of the invention, an attack is deemed to occur if the deviation score is between 0.6 and 1.4.

Claims

1. A method for detecting an attack on a computer network comprising:

generating a time series of data values derived from network traffic;

for each entry in the time series, calculating a difference-value, based upon a value in the entry and a number based upon other values in a time window, for a large time-window and a small time-window;

determining a deviation score for at least one entry in the time series by calculating the ratio of the difference-value for the small-window to the difference-value for the large window; and

for a point in the time series, determining that a network attack occurred within the small time-window by determining whether the respective deviation score is outside of a range of values.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

based upon said step of determining that a network attack occurred, blocking a plurality of network packets.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein generating a time series of data values derived from network traffic comprises collecting traffic data from a network router.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

sending an alert indicating that an attack is occurring.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the range of normal values is about 0.6-1.4.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein calculating a difference-value for a value in a time series based on a time-window comprises calculating the square of the difference between the value and the average value in the time-window.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the difference value is calculated in real-time as packets are received without updating the average value in each time-window for every packet received.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the time series consists of pairs of data, each pair including:

a value indicating the number of packets received during a period, and

a value indicating the period of time during which the packets were received.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the value indicating the period of time during which the packets were received is an integer indicating a number of seconds between a predetermined point in time and the start of the period, and the period is deemed to be one second long.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein the value indicating the number of packets received is determined by counting only those packets that meet a set of criteria.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the set of criteria includes a criteria requiring a packet to contain a request to resolve a domain name.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the set of criteria further includes a criteria requiring the domain name in the request to be a domain name that cannot be resolved.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein the set of criteria includes a criteria requiring a packet to contain one or more errors in the packet headers.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein the small time-window is contained within the large time-window.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the small time-window is a period of time immediately following the large time-window.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the large time-window is about 100 times the size of the small time-window.

17. The method of claim 1 wherein the small time-window is about 60 seconds.

18. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

for a field present in a plurality of network packets that are part of the network traffic, wherein the field in each packet can hold one of a plurality of values, determining the number of packets in which the field holds each value for packets received in the large time-window and packets received in the small time-window; and

for at least one of the plurality of values, based upon the number of packets containing the value were received in the small time-window and the number of packets containing the value were observed in the large time-window, determining that the at least one value indicates that a packet is a part of the attack.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising:

blocking one or more incoming network packets that contain the at least one value.

20. The method of claim 18 wherein the field stores an origin IP address.

21. The method of claim 18 wherein the field indicates information about a protocol connection state.

22. The method of claim 18 wherein the field indicates whether a packet is consistent with the state of a connection which it is part of.

23. The method of claim 18 wherein the field indicates an HTTP user-agent string and a number of different HTTP user-agent strings are deemed to be the same value.

24. The method of claim 20 wherein all IP addresses within a particular range are deemed to be the same value.

25. The method of claim 18 wherein each of the plurality of network packets contains a request to resolve a domain name, and wherein the field holds the domain name.

26. The method of claim 25 wherein a dumber of different domain names are deemed to be the same value.

27. The method of claim 18 wherein the field holds a time to live value.

28. The method of claim 18 wherein the packet field holds a message size.

29. The method of claim 18 wherein the field holds information from which the geographic origin of the packet can be determined, and the country or origin is deemed to be the value.

30. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

assigning each of a plurality of network packets that are part of the network traffic to one of a plurality of categories;

for one of the plurality of categories, determining the number of network packets assigned to the category that were received in the small time-window and the number of network packets assigned to the category that were received in the large time-window;

determining that packets assigned to the category are part of the network attack.

31. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

determining a set of suspect IP addresses by determining the source IP addresses of packets that occurred in the small time-window, but which did not occur in the large time-window.

32. The method of claim 31 further comprising:

blocking traffic from the set of suspect IP addresses.