DETERMINING SLUG CATCHER SIZE USING SIMPLIFIED MULTIPHASE FLOW MODELS

• US 20120185220A1
• Filed: 01/19/2011
• Published: 07/19/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 01/19/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation (SLB)
• Original Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation (SLB)
• Inventors: Shippen, Mack Edward
• Application Number:
  US13/009,153
• Publication Number:
  US 20120185220A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 703/2
• CPC Class Codes: F17D 1/088 for solids or suspensions of solids in liquids, e.g. slurries F17D1/086 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: F17D 3/08 the different products being separated by "go-devils", e.g. spheres cleaning devices moved along inside a pipe-lines by fluid pressure B08B9/04; pigs or moles per se, their launching and detection F16L55/26
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/20 Design optimisation, verification or simulation optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30

Abstract

An integrated workflow to determine slug catcher size in a pipeline network of an oilfield using successive steady-state and/or simplified transient simulation such that a comprehensive analysis is automatically performed in a short amount of time. In particular, the workflow simultaneously considers several scenarios such that the most limiting case can be used to determine the slug catcher size. Further, the limiting operational parameters that impose the most limiting case may be constrained by the user to mitigate the worst case slug catcher size requirement. Based on the short computation time required, the workflow may be executed iteratively to adjust the constraint while a final slug catcher size is selected by the user. The final slug catcher size is then implemented in the production system with the final constraint included in the operational plan of the production system.

Claims

1. A method for selecting a size of a slug catcher in a pipeline network configured for extracting and transporting multiphase fluid from a reservoir in a subterranean formation, comprising:

obtaining a network model of the pipeline network, wherein the network model comprises a geometry of the pipeline network and characteristics of an equipment associated with the pipeline network;

obtaining operational parameters of the pipeline network, wherein the operational parameters relate to extraction and transportation activities of the multiphase fluid;

determining, by a processor of a computer system, a plurality of slug catcher sizes of the slug catcher, comprising;

determining a first slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a hydrodynamic slugging scenario of the network model using a first subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the first slug catcher size is a first function of travel distance of the multiphase fluid and is determined based on a probabilistic model of the extraction and transportation activities, and

determining a second slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a pigging scenario of the network model using a second subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the second slug catcher size is determined based on liquid holdup of the multiphase fluid caused by performing a pigging operation in the pipeline network,

wherein the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size are determined by performing a successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using a first mass conservation equation, an energy conservation equation, and a momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on a steady-state,

generating, by the processor, a hydrodynamic slugging plot and a pigging analysis plot based on the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size, respectively;

generating, by the processor and using selected values of the operational parameters from a user, a combined scenario plot based on the hydrodynamic slugging plot and the pigging analysis plot; and

displaying the combined scenario plot for the user, wherein the size of the slug catcher is selected from the plurality of slug catcher sizes by the user based on an evaluation of the combined scenario plot.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying a limiting parameter from the first subset and the second subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the limiting parameter imposes a worst case slug catcher size requirement for the plurality of slug catcher sizes;

receiving, from the user, a constraint of the limiting parameter to mitigate the worst case slug catcher size requirement, wherein the constraint is identified based on at least the evaluation of the combined scenario plot by the user;

adjusting, prior to the user selecting the size of the slug catcher, the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size by further performing the successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid based on the constraint; and

including the constraint in a field operation plan corresponding to the size of the slug catcher selected by the user.

3. The method of claim 1,

wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes further comprises:

determining a third slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on an instantaneous ramp-up scenario of the network model using a third subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the third slug catcher size is determined based on sensitivity of liquid holdup with respect to overall flow rate induced by increases of input flow rate of the pipeline network, and

wherein determining the third slug catcher size comprises performing the successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using the first mass conservation equation, the energy conservation equation, and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state, and

wherein the method further comprises;

generating an instantaneous ramp-up analysis plot based on the third slug catcher size,

wherein the combined scenario plot is further generated based on the instantaneous ramp-up analysis plot.

4. The method of claim 3,

wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes further comprises:

determining a fourth slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a gradual ramp-up scenario of the network model using a fourth subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the fourth slug catcher size is determined based on sensitivity of liquid holdup with respect to overall flow rate induced by increases of input flow rate of the pipeline network, and

wherein determining the fourth slug catcher size comprises performing a simplified transient analysis of the multiphase fluid using a second mass conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that is time dependent and using the energy conservation equation and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state, and

wherein the method further comprises;

generating a gradual ramp-up analysis plot based on the fourth slug catcher size,

wherein the combined scenario plot is further generated based on the gradual ramp-up analysis plot.

5. The method of claim 4,

wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes further comprises:

determining a fifth slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a severe slugging scenario of the network model using a fifth subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the fifth slug catcher size is determined based on a volume of a riser in the pipeline network; and

wherein determining the fifth slug catcher size comprises performing the successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using the first mass conservation equation, the energy conservation equation, and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state, and

wherein the method further comprises;

generating a severe slugging analysis plot based on the fifth slug catcher size,

wherein the combined scenario plot is further generated based on the severe slugging analysis plot.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

iteratively identifying a limiting parameter from the first subset, the second subset, the third subset, the fourth subset, and the fifth subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the limiting parameter imposes a worst case slug catcher size requirement for the plurality of slug catcher sizes;

iteratively receiving a constraint of the iteratively identified limiting parameter from the user, wherein the iteratively received constraint is identified by the user based on an iterative evaluation of the combined scenario plot;

adjusting, prior to the user selecting the size of the slug catcher, the first slug catcher size, the second slug catcher size, the third slug catcher size, the fourth slug catcher size, and the fifth slug catcher size by iteratively performing the successive steady-state analysis and the simplified transient analysis of the multiphase fluid based on the iteratively received constraint; and

including a version of the iteratively received constraint in a field operation plan corresponding to the size of the slug catcher selected by the user.

7. The method of claim 5,

wherein each of the hydrodynamic slugging plot, the pigging analysis plot, the instantaneous ramp-up analysis plot, the gradual ramp-up analysis plot, and the severe slugging analysis plot comprises a trend plot and a system plot,

wherein the trend plot comprises calculated output liquid rate as a second function of time and calculated slug catcher inventory as a third function of time,

wherein the second function and the third function are parameterized functions with respect to a turn down ratio, and

wherein the system plot comprises a calculated slug catcher size as a fourth function of the turn down ratio.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes is based on modeling the multiphase fluid using at least one selected from a group consisting of a black-oil model and a compositional equation of state.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the operational parameters of the pipeline network comprise at least one selected from a group consisting of boundary conditions of pressures, rates, and phase ratios;

injection rates and pressures;

start and end flow rates for ramp-up operation;

duration of a ramp-up operation;

pig leakage efficiency;

pigging frequency;

a steady-state separator liquid volume ratio;

a separator volume;

a separator liquid volume ratio at a diversion point of the slug catcher;

a separator drainage rate;

a slug catcher drainage rate; and

a slug catcher size safety factor.

10. A system for selecting a size of a slug catcher in a pipeline network configured for extracting and transporting multiphase fluid from a reservoir in a subterranean formation, comprising:

a repository configured to store a network model comprising a geometry of the pipeline network and characteristics of equipment associated with the pipeline network, wherein the pipeline network is associated with operational parameters relating to extraction and transportation activities of the multiphase fluid;

a processor and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to;

determine a plurality of slug catcher sizes of the slug catcher, comprising;

determining a first slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a hydrodynamic slugging scenario of the network model using a first subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the first slug catcher size is a first function of travel distance of the multiphase fluid and is determined based on a probabilistic model of the extraction and transportation activities, and

determining a second slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a ramp-up scenario of the network model using a second subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the second slug catcher size is determined based on sensitivity of liquid holdup with respect to overall flow rate induced by increases of input flow rate of the pipeline network,

wherein the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size are determined by performing (i) a successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using a first mass conservation equation, an energy conservation equation, and a momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on a steady-state and (ii) a simplified transient analysis of the multiphase fluid using a second mass conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that is time dependent and using the energy conservation equation and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state,

generate a hydrodynamic slugging plot and a ramp-up analysis plot based on the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size, respectively;

generate, using selected values of the operational parameters from a user, a combined scenario plot based on the hydrodynamic slugging plot and the ramp-up analysis plot; and

a display device configured to display the combined scenario plot for the user, wherein the size of the slug catcher is selected from the plurality of slug catcher sizes by the user based on an evaluation of the combined scenario plot.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

identify a limiting parameter from the first subset and the second subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the limiting parameter imposes a worst case slug catcher size requirement for the plurality of slug catcher sizes;

receive, from the user, a constraint of the limiting parameter to mitigate the worst case slug catcher size requirement, wherein the constraint is identified based on at least the evaluation of the combined scenario plot by the user; and

adjust, prior to the user selecting the size of the slug catcher, the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size by further performing the successive steady-state analysis and the simplified transient analysis of the multiphase fluid based on the constraint.

12. The system of claim 10,

wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes further comprises:

determining a third slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a pigging scenario of the network model using a third subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the third slug catcher size is determined based on liquid holdup of the multiphase fluid caused by performing a pigging operation in the pipeline network,

wherein determining the third slug catcher size comprises performing the successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using the first mass conservation equation, the energy conservation equation, and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state, and

wherein the instructions further cause the processor to;

generate a pigging analysis plot based on the third slug catcher size,

wherein the combined scenario plot is further generated based on the pigging analysis plot.

13. The system of claim 12,

wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes further comprises:

determining a fourth slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a severe slugging scenario of the network model using a fourth subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the fourth slug catcher size is determined based on a volume of a riser in the pipeline network,

wherein determining the fourth slug catcher size comprises performing the successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using the first mass conservation equation, the energy conservation equation, and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state, and

wherein the instructions further cause the processor to;

generate a severe slugging analysis plot based on the fourth slug catcher size,

wherein the combined scenario plot is further generated based on the severe slugging analysis plot.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

iteratively identify a limiting parameter from the first subset, the second subset, the third subset, the fourth subset, and the fifth subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the limiting parameter imposes a worst case slug catcher size requirement for the plurality of slug catcher sizes;

iteratively receive, from the user, a constraint of the iteratively identified limiting parameter, wherein the iteratively received constraint is identified by the user based on an iterative evaluation of the combined scenario plot;

adjust, prior to the user selecting the size of the slug catcher, the first slug catcher size, the second slug catcher size, the third slug catcher size, and the fourth slug catcher size by iteratively performing the successive steady-state analysis and the simplified transient analysis of the multiphase fluid based on the iteratively received constraint; and

include a version of the iteratively received constraint in a field operation plan corresponding to the size of the slug catcher selected by the user.

15. The system of claim 13,

wherein each of the hydrodynamic slugging plot, the pigging analysis plot, the instantaneous ramp-up analysis plot, the gradual ramp-up analysis plot, and the severe slugging analysis plot comprises a trend plot and a system plot,

wherein the trend plot comprises calculated output liquid rate as a second function of time and calculated slug catcher inventory as a third function of time,

wherein the second function and the third function are parameterized functions with respect to a turn down ratio, and

wherein the system plot comprises a calculated slug catcher size as a fourth function of the turn down ratio.

16. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions for determining a size of a slug catcher in a pipeline network configured for extracting and transporting multiphase fluid from a reservoir in a subterranean formation, the instructions when executed causing a processor to:

obtain a network model of the pipeline network, wherein the network model comprises a geometry of the pipeline network and characteristics of an equipment associated with the pipeline network;

obtain operational parameters of the pipeline network, wherein the operational parameters relate to extraction and transportation activities of the multiphase fluid;

determine a plurality of slug catcher sizes of the slug catcher, comprising;

determining a first slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a hydrodynamic slugging scenario of the network model using a first subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the first slug catcher size is a first function of travel distance of the multiphase fluid and is determined based on a probabilistic model of the extraction and transportation activities, and

determining a second slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a pigging scenario of the network model using a second subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the second slug catcher size is determined based on liquid holdup of the multiphase fluid caused by performing a pigging operation in the pipeline network,

wherein the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size are determined by performing a successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using a first mass conservation equation, an energy conservation equation, and a momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on a steady-state,

generate a hydrodynamic slugging plot and a pigging analysis plot based on the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size, respectively;

generate, using selected values of the operational parameters from a user, a combined scenario plot based on the hydrodynamic slugging plot and the pigging analysis plot; and

display the combined scenario plot for the user, wherein the size of the slug catcher is selected from the plurality of slug catcher sizes by the user based on an evaluation of the combined scenario plot.

17. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 16, the instructions when executed further cause a processor to:

identify a limiting parameter from the first subset and the second subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the limiting parameter imposes a worst case slug catcher size requirement for the plurality of slug catcher sizes;

receive, from the user, a constraint of the limiting parameter to mitigate the worst case slug catcher size requirement, wherein the constraint is identified based on at least the evaluation of the combined scenario plot by the user;

adjust, prior to the user selecting the size of the slug catcher, the first slug catcher size and the second slug catcher size by further performing the successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid based on the constraint; and

include the constraint in a field operation plan corresponding to the size of the slug catcher selected by the user.

18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 16,

wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes further comprises:

determining a third slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on an instantaneous ramp-up scenario of the network model using a third subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the third slug catcher size is determined based on sensitivity of liquid holdup with respect to overall flow rate induced by increases of input flow rate of the pipeline network, and

wherein determining the third slug catcher size comprises performing the successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using the first mass conservation equation, the energy conservation equation, and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state, and

wherein the method further comprises;

generating an instantaneous ramp-up analysis plot based on the third slug catcher size,

wherein the combined scenario plot is further generated based on the instantaneous ramp-up analysis plot.

19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 18,

wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes further comprises:

determining a fourth slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a gradual ramp-up scenario of the network model using a fourth subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the fourth slug catcher size is determined based on sensitivity of liquid holdup with respect to overall flow rate induced by increases of input flow rate of the pipeline network, and

wherein determining the fourth slug catcher size comprises performing a simplified transient analysis of the multiphase fluid using a second mass conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that is time dependent and using the energy conservation equation and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state, and

wherein the method further comprises;

generating a gradual ramp-up analysis plot based on the fourth slug catcher size,

wherein the combined scenario plot is further generated based on the gradual ramp-up analysis plot.

20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 19,

wherein determining the plurality of slug catcher sizes further comprises:

determining a fifth slug catcher size of the plurality of slug catcher sizes based on a severe slugging scenario of the network model using a fifth subset of values of the operational parameters, wherein the fifth slug catcher size is determined based on a volume of a riser in the pipeline network; and

wherein determining the fifth slug catcher size comprises performing the successive steady-state analysis of the multiphase fluid using the first mass conservation equation, the energy conservation equation, and the momentum conservation equation of the multiphase fluid that are based on the steady-state, and

wherein the method further comprises;

generating a severe slugging analysis plot based on the fifth slug catcher size,

wherein the combined scenario plot is further generated based on the severe slugging analysis plot.