METHODS AND NETWORK NODES FOR ALLOCATING CONTROL CHANNEL ELEMENTS FOR PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL

• US 20120230211A1
• Filed: 03/08/2011
• Published: 09/13/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 03/08/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
• Original Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
• Inventors: Sandberg, David, Östergaard, Jessica
• Application Number:
  US13/042,969
• Publication Number:
  US 20120230211A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 370/252
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 27/2601 Multicarrier modulation systems
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 5/0053 Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 5/0064 Rate requirement of the data, e.g. scalable bandwidth, data priority

Abstract

Methods and nodes of a telecommunications system are disclosed. How many Control Channel Elements of a Frequency Division Multiplexing radio interface are used to transmit a Physical Downlink Control Channel message from a node of the telecommunications system to a User Equipment unit are controlled based on whether the node received from the User Equipment unit a response to a prior Physical Downlink Control Channel message transmitted to the User Equipment unit.

Claims

1. A method of operating a node of a telecommunications system, the method comprising:

controlling how many Control Channel Elements, CCEs, of a frequency or time division multiplexing radio interface are used to transmit a Physical Downlink Control Channel, PDCCH, message to a User Equipment unit, UE, based on a rate of expected responses that the node does not receive from the UE for previously transmitted PDCCH messages to the UE.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein controlling how many CCEs are used to transmit the PDCCH message to the UE further comprises:

comparing the rate of expected responses that the node does not receive to a threshold value to determine when to increase the number of CCEs that are used to communicate the PDCCH message; and

controlling the threshold value of the comparison based on uplink channel quality from the UE to the node so that as uplink channel quality decreases a higher rate of expected responses that the node does not receive is needed to trigger an increase in the number of CCEs.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein controlling how many CCEs are used to transmit the PDCCH message to the UE comprises:

communicating a PDCCH message containing a DownLink, DL, assignment to the UE;

responding to corresponding receipt of a ACKnowledgement, ACK, or Negative-ACKnowledgement, NACK, from the UE by decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE; and

responding to absence of corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE by increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

receiving a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE; and

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE,

wherein responding to corresponding receipt of an ACK or NACK from the UE by decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE comprises;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false ACK or false NACK was received by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR, and

wherein responding to absence of corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE by increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE comprises;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an ACK or NACK from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein controlling how many CCEs are used to transmit the PDCCH message to the UE comprises:

communicating a PDCCH message containing an UpLink, UL, grant to the UE;

responding to corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE; and

responding to absence of corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

receiving a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE; and

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE,

wherein responding to corresponding receipt of the UL transmission from the UE by decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE comprises;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was not successfully decoded and a false UL transmission was detected by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR, and

wherein responding to absence of corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE comprises;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an UL transmission from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein controlling how many CCEs are used to transmit the PDCCH message to the UE comprises:

receiving a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE;

communicating within a same subframe, a DownLink, DL, assignment and an UpLink, UL, grant through PDCCH messages to the UE;

responding to corresponding receipt of an ACKnowledgement, ACK, or Negative-ACKnowledgement, NACK, from the UE and receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by further carrying out;

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false ACK or false NACK was received by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value, and responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false UL transmission was detected by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein controlling how many CCEs are used to transmit the PDCCH message to the UE comprises:

receiving a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE;

communicating within a same subframe, a DownLink, DL, assignment and an UpLink, UL, grant through PDCCH messages to the UE;

responding to corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE and to absence of corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE by further carrying out;

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an ACK or NACK from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value, and responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false UL transmission was detected by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

controlling how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein controlling how many CCEs are used to transmit the PDCCH message to the UE comprises:

receiving a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE;

communicating within a same subframe, a DownLink, DL, assignment and an UpLink, UL, grant through PDCCH messages to the UE;

responding to corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE and to absence of corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by further carrying out;

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false ACK or false NACK was received by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value, and responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an UL transmission from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

controlling how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein controlling how many CCEs are used to transmit the PDCCH message to the UE comprises:

receiving a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE;

communicating within a same subframe, a DownLink, DL, assignment and an UpLink, UL, grant through PDCCH messages to the UE;

responding to absence of corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE and to absence of corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by further carrying out;

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an ACK or NACK from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value, and responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an UL transmission from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

11. A node of a telecommunications system, the node comprising:

a transceiver configured to communicate over a frequency or time division multiplexing radio interface with a User Equipment unit, UE; and

a Physical Downlink Control Channel, PDCCH, processor configured to control how many Control Channel Elements, CCEs, of the radio interface are used to transmit a PDCCH message to the UE based on a rate of expected responses that the node does not receive from the UE for previously transmitted PDCCH messages to the UE.

12. The node of claim 11, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to compare the rate of expected responses that the node does not receive to a threshold value to determine when to increase the number of CCEs that are used to communicate the PDCCH message, and to control the threshold value of the comparison based on uplink channel quality from the UE to the node so that as uplink channel quality decreases a higher rate of expected responses that the node does not receive is needed to trigger an increase in the number of CCEs.

13. The node of claim 11, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to:

transmit a PDCCH message containing a DownLink, DL, assignment via the transceiver to the UE;

respond to corresponding receipt of an ACKnowledgement, ACK, or Negative-ACKnowledgement, NACK, via the transceiver from the UE by decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE; and

respond to absence of corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE by increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE.

14. The node of claim 13, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to:

receive a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE via the transceiver; and

estimate a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE,

wherein, to respond to corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE by decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE, the PDCCH processor is further configured to;

determine an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false ACK or false NACK was received by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

decrease how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR, and

wherein, to respond to absence of corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE by increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE, the PDCCH processor is further configured to;

determine an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an ACK or NACK from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

increase how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

15. The node of claim 11, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to:

transmit a PDCCH message containing an UpLink, UL, grant via the transceiver to the UE;

respond to corresponding receipt of an UL transmission via the transceiver from the UE by decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE; and

respond to absence of corresponding receipt of an UL transmission by increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE.

16. The node of claim 15, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to:

receive a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE via the transceiver; and

estimate a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE,

wherein, to respond to corresponding receipt of the UL transmission from the UE by decreasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE, the PDCCH processor is further configured to;

determine an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was not successfully decoded and a false UL transmission was detected by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

decrease how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR, and

wherein, to respond to absence of corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE, the PDCCH processor is further configured to;

determine an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an UL transmission from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

increase how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

17. The node of claim 11, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to:

receive a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE;

transmit within a same subframe, a DownLink, DL, assignment and an UpLink, UL, grant through PDCCH messages via the transceiver to the UE;

respond to corresponding receipt of an ACKnowledgement, ACK, or Negative-ACKnowledgement, NACK, via the transceiver from the UE and to corresponding receipt of an UL transmission via the transceiver from the UE by further carrying out;

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false ACK or false NACK was received by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value, and responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false UL transmission was detected by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

decrease how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

18. The node of claim 11, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to:

receive a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE;

transmit within a same subframe, a DownLink, DL, assignment and an UpLink, UL, grant through PDCCH messages via the transceiver to the UE;

respond to corresponding receipt of an UL transmission via the transceiver from the UE and to absence of corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE by further carrying out;

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an ACK or NACK from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value, and responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false UL transmission was detected by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

controlling how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

19. The node of claim 11, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to:

receiving a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE;

communicate within a same subframe, a DownLink, DL, assignment and an UpLink, UL, grant through PDCCH messages via the transceiver to the UE;

respond to corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK via the transceiver from the UE and to absence of corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by further carrying out;

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE and a false ACK or false NACK was received by the node while subject to the estimated SINR value, and responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an UL transmission from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

controlling how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.

20. The node of claim 11, wherein the PDCCH processor is further configured to:

receive a Channel Status Report, CSR, from the UE;

communicate within a same subframe, a DownLink, DL, assignment and an UpLink, UL, grant through PDCCH messages via the transceiver to the UE;

respond to absence of corresponding receipt of the ACK or NACK from the UE and to absence of corresponding receipt of an UL transmission from the UE by further carrying out;

estimating a Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio, SINR, value for communications from the UE;

determining an adjustment value responsive to a probability that;

     1) the DL assignment was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the DL assignment was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an ACK or NACK from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value, and responsive to a probability that;

     1) the UL grant was not successfully decoded by the UE;

or

     2) the UL grant was successfully decoded by the UE and the node failed to detect an UL transmission from the UE while subject to the estimated SINR value; and

increasing how many CCEs are used to communicate a PDCCH message to the UE in response to the adjustment value and to the CSR.