SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ACTIVE MITIGATION OF SUDDEN ACCELERATIVE FORCES IN VEHICLES

• US 20120239247A1
• Filed: 08/17/2011
• Published: 09/20/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 03/16/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: General Dynamics Land Systems Incorporated (General Dynamics Corporation)
• Original Assignee: General Dynamics Land Systems Incorporated (General Dynamics Corporation)
• Inventors: Eridon, James Michael
• Application Number:
  US13/211,991
• Publication Number:
  US 20120239247A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/36
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/01 Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents electrical circuits for transmission of signals between steering wheel and the vehicle itself B60R16/027; for electrically actuating belt retractor locking means B60R22/343

Abstract

An active blast mitigation system includes one or more sensors configured to produce a set of acceleration signals indicative of a dynamic response of the vehicle. A control system communicatively coupled to the plurality of sensors is configured to determine the dynamic response of the vehicle based on the set of acceleration signals and determine whether mitigation is required based on the dynamic response of the vehicle. If it is determined that mitigation is required, the control system produces one or more countermeasure signals selected to at least partially counteract the dynamic response. Countermeasure assemblies communicatively coupled to the control system are configured to activate in response to the one or more countermeasure signals.

Claims

1. A method of mitigating sudden accelerative forces experienced by a vehicle, comprising:

determining a dynamic response of the vehicle resulting from the sudden accelerative forces;

determining whether mitigation is required based on the dynamic response of the vehicle; and

if it is determined that mitigation is required, activating one or more countermeasures to generate mitigating forces on the vehicle such that the sudden accelerative forces are at least partially counteracted.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the dynamic response comprises receiving a set of signals from one or more acceleration sensors mechanically coupled to the vehicle.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more acceleration sensors include a first acceleration sensor proximate a first end of the vehicle, and a second acceleration sensor proximate a second end of the vehicle.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether mitigation is required comprises determining whether the dynamic response of the vehicle has an amplitude that is greater than a predetermined threshold.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether mitigation is required comprises determining whether the dynamic response of the vehicle is likely to cause damage to an occupant within the vehicle.

6. The method of claim 1, further including determining the dynamic response, determining whether mitigation is required, and activating the one or more countermeasures is performed in accordance with commands received from a human interface.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the dynamic response of the vehicle is characterized by a rotation and a translation of the vehicle, and wherein activating the one or more countermeasures includes activating one or more countermeasures coupled to a topside of the vehicle such that the mitigating forces at least partially counteract the rotation and the translation of the vehicle.

8. An active blast mitigation system for a vehicle, comprising:

one or more sensors configured to produce a set of acceleration signals indicative of a dynamic response of the vehicle;

a control system communicatively coupled to the plurality of sensors, the control system configured to determine the dynamic response of the vehicle based on the set of acceleration signals, determine whether mitigation is required based on the dynamic response of the vehicle, and, if it is determined that mitigation is required, produce one or more countermeasure signals, the countermeasure signals selected to at least partially counteract the dynamic response; and

a plurality of countermeasure assemblies communicatively coupled to the control system, the plurality of countermeasure assemblies configured to activate in response to the one or more countermeasure signals.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the one or more sensors include a first acceleration sensor proximate a first end of the vehicle, and a second acceleration sensor proximate a second end of the vehicle.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the control system is configured to determine whether mitigation is required by determining whether an amplitude of the dynamic response is above a predetermined threshold.

11. The system of claim 8, further including a human interface communicatively coupled to the control system, wherein the control system is configured to determine the dynamic response, determine whether mitigation is required, and produce the countermeasure signals in accordance with commands received from the human interface.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the human interface further includes status indicators indicating which of the countermeasure assemblies and sensors are functional, and whether the active blast mitigation system is armed.

13. The system of claim 8, wherein the vehicle includes a hull, and wherein the plurality of countermeasure assemblies include at least one topside countermeasure assembly coupled to the top of the hull.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the at least one topside countermeasure includes:

an armor layer coupled to an external surface of the hull; and

an energetic material layer coupled to the armor layer.

15. The system of claim 14, further including a tamping layer coupled to the energetic material layer.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the armor layer comprises a ceramic, the tamping layer comprises steel, and the thickness of the tamping layer is selected to provide a predetermined mitigating force when activated.

18. The control system of claim 16, wherein the processor is configured to determine whether mitigation is required by determining whether an amplitude of the dynamic response is above a predetermined threshold.

19. The control system of claim 16, wherein the processor is communicatively coupled to a human interface, and wherein the processor is configured to determine the dynamic response, determine whether mitigation is required, and produce the countermeasure signals in accordance with commands received from the human interface.

20. The control system of claim 16, wherein the control system is further configured to:

determine the dynamic response, determine whether mitigation is required, and produce the countermeasure signals in accordance with commands received from a human interface;

receive status information from the one or more countermeasure assemblies and the one or more sensors; and

transmit the status information to the human interface.

17. An active mine blast mitigation control system, comprising:

an input interface configured to be coupled to one or more acceleration sensors and to receive a set of acceleration signals indicative of a dynamic response of a vehicle;

an output interface configured to be coupled to one or more countermeasure assemblies and to transmit one or more countermeasure signals thereto;

a processor communicatively coupled to the input interface and the output interface, the processor configured to determine the dynamic response of the vehicle based on the set of acceleration signals, determine whether mitigation is required based on the dynamic response of the vehicle, and, if it is determined that mitigation is required, produce the one or more countermeasure signals.