METHOD AND SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENTLY PROCESSING LARGE VOLUMES OF COMPLEX SMALL VALUE FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS

• US 20120239558A1
• Filed: 03/16/2012
• Published: 09/20/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 03/16/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Gridx, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Gridx, Inc.
• Inventors: Zhang, Jian
• Application Number:
  US13/422,943
• Publication Number:
  US 20120239558A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/39
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes

Abstract

The present invention provides a means for a system to model the financial terms of a contract. The system receives a contract and the details of a transaction governed by the contract as inputs and outputs a processed transaction. The system models the financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more parameters. Each of the parameters are further reduced to one or more rules, where each rule represents the terms of the contract as a set of conditions and associated actions. The actions are performed by the system when a corresponding condition is satisfied. The system determines the values of the various parameters by analyzing the outcome of the condition-action sets in relation to the given input transaction.

Claims

1. A method for determining a payment under a contract, the method comprising:

modeling, by a financial computing system, financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more first parameters, each of the one or more first parameters being a function of one or more second parameters, each of the one or more first or second parameters associated with one or more rules, wherein each rule represents terms of the contract as a set of a plurality of conditions and associated plurality of actions, each of the plurality of actions being performed when a corresponding plurality of conditions is satisfied;

forwarding, by the financial computing system, one or more rules to a contract rule-engine;

for each of the first or second parameters, interpreting, by the contract rule-engine, a relationship between the one or more rules associated with the given parameter;

receiving, by the financial computing system, details of a financial transaction governed by the contract;

identifying, by the financial computing system, one or more transaction conditions from the received details;

determining, by the financial computing system, a state value of the one or more transaction conditions based on the details of the financial transaction;

traversing, by the financial computing system, the interpreted relationship of each parameter based on the computed state value of the one or more transaction conditions to determine a transaction value for each of the plurality of parameters; and

determining, by the financial computing system, the payment under the financial terms of the contract as a function of the determined transaction values of the one or more first or second parameters.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein traversing the interpreted relationship of each of the plurality of parameters includes:

providing, by the financial computing system, the computed state value of each of the one or more transaction conditions to the rule-interpretation engine;

applying, by the contract rule-engine, the computed state value of each of the one or more transaction conditions to the rules associated with each of the parameters; and

determining, by the contract rule-engine, the transaction value for each of the parameters based on the outcome of each of the plurality of actions being performed when the plurality of conditions associated with each of the plurality of actions are evaluated based on the computed state value.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the financial terms of a contract are determined by decomposing a contract into a plurality of contract templates, each contract template representing a predetermined plurality of financial terms.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the contract is associated with a sale or purchase of electric power, further wherein the contract for sale or purchase of power includes one or more first or second parameters, the one or more first or second parameters including:

a committed rate;

or

a committed load base rate.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the contract is associated with a music license, further wherein the contract for music license includes one or more first or second parameters, the one or more first or second parameters including:

an effective royalty rate;

an effective unit;

an escalation rate;

a basic US rate;

a channel reduction rate;

or

a territory reduction rate.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the contract rule-engine includes one or more of:

a decision table;

or

a rule engine.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the rule engine is third-party software.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said modeling financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more first or second parameters further includes:

incorporating changes to financial terms of the contract by adding to or removing from the one or more rules.

9. A method for determining a payment under a contract, the method comprising:

modeling, by a financial computing system, financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more parameters, each of the one or more parameters represented as a separate decision tree;

representing, by a financial computing system, each decision tree associated with the contract in a format suitable for computer implemented traversal;

receiving, by a financial computing system, details of a financial transaction governed by the contract;

traversing, by a financial computing system, each decision tree associated with each of the one or more parameters based on the received details of the financial transaction to determine a value for each of the one or more parameters; and

determining, by the financial computing system, the payment according to financial terms specified in the contract, the payment calculated as a function of the determined transaction values of the one or more parameters.

10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the modeling includes:

determining if contractual terms are for usages, rates, or modification factors;

identifying contractual conditions;

constructing decision tree branches based on identified contractual conditions;

constructing leaf nodes; and

filling in usages, rates or modification factors.

11. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein said modeling financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more first or second parameters further includes:

providing a graphical user interface to enable a user to map information from the contract into a template; and

automatically generating the decision tree representation via the mapped information that is used to model the financial terms of a contact.

12. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the financial computing system uses Hadoop software for implementing a distributed file system.

13. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the financial computing system uses a Map Reduce computing model for processing the financial transaction.

14. A method for modeling terms of a contract, the method comprising:

modeling, by a financial computing system, financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more first parameters, each of the one or more first parameters being a function of one or more second parameters, each of the one or more first or second parameters associated with one or more rules, wherein each rule represents terms of the contract as a set of a plurality of conditions and associated plurality of actions, each of the plurality of actions being performed when a corresponding plurality of conditions is satisfied.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the financial terms of a contract are determined by decomposing a contract into a plurality of contract templates, each contract template representing a predetermined plurality of financial terms.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein said modeling financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more first or second parameters further includes:

incorporating changes to financial terms of the contract by adding to or removing from the one or more rules.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein for each of the first or second parameters, a contract rule-engine interprets the relationship between the one or more rules associated with the given parameter.

18. The method of claim 14, wherein the contract rule-engine includes one or more of;

a decision table;

or

a rule engine.

19. The method of claim 14, wherein the contract is associated with a sale or purchase of electric power, further wherein the contract for sale or purchase of power includes one or more first or second parameters, the one or more first or second parameters including:

a committed rate;

or

a committed load base rate.

20. The method of claim 14, wherein the contract is associated with a music license, further wherein the contract for music license includes one or more first or second parameters, the one or more first or second parameters including:

an effective royalty rate;

an effective unit;

an escalation rate;

a basic US rate;

a channel reduction rate;

or

a territory reduction rate.

21. A financial computing system for determining a payment under a contra the system comprising;

a financial processing module for modeling financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more first parameters, each of the one or more first parameters being a function of one or more second parameters, each of the one or more first or second parameters associated with one or more rules, wherein each rule represents terms of the contract as a set of a plurality of conditions and associated plurality of actions, each of the plurality of actions being performed when a corresponding plurality of conditions is satisfied;

the financial processing module for forwarding one or more rules to a contract rule-engine;

for each of the first or second parameters, a contract rule-engine module for interpreting a relationship between the one or more rules associated with the given parameter;

the financial processing module for receiving details of a financial transaction governed by the contract;

the financial processing module for identifying one or more transaction conditions from the received details;

the financial processing module for determining a state value of the one or more transaction conditions based on the details of the financial transaction;

the financial processing module for traversing the interpreted relationship of each parameter based on the computed state value of the one or more transaction conditions to determine a transaction value for each of the plurality of parameters; and

the financial processing module for determining the payment under the financial terms of the contract as a function of the determined transaction values of the one or more first or second parameters.

22. The financial processing system as recited in claim 21, wherein the financial processing module for traversing the interpreted relationship of each of the plurality of parameters further comprises:

providing the computed state value of each of the one or more transaction conditions to the rule-interpretation engine;

applying the computed state value of each of the one or more transaction conditions to the rules associated with each of the parameters; and

determining the transaction value for each of the parameters based on the outcome of each of the plurality of actions being performed when the plurality of conditions associated with each of the plurality of actions are evaluated based on the computed state value.

23. The financial processing system as recited in claim 21, wherein the financial terms of a contract are determined by the financial processing module by decomposing a contract into a plurality of contract templates, each contract template representing a predetermined plurality of financial terms.

24. The financial processing system as recited in claim 21, wherein the contract modeled by the financial processing module is associated with a sale or purchase of electric power, further wherein the contract for sale or purchase of power includes one or more first or second parameters, the one or more first or second parameters including:

a committed rate;

or

a committed load base rate.

25. The financial processing system as recited in claim 21, wherein the contract modeled by the financial processing module is associated with a music license, further wherein the contract for music license includes one or more first or second parameters, the one or more first or second parameters including:

an effective royalty rate;

an effective unit;

an escalation rate;

a basic US rate;

a channel reduction rate;

or

a territory reduction rate.

26. The financial processing system as recited in claim 21, wherein the contract rule-engine module includes one or more of:

a decision table;

or

a rule engine.

27. The financial processing system as recited in claim 26, wherein the rule engine included in the contract rule-engine module is third-party software.

28. The financial processing system as recited in claim 21, wherein said modeling financial terms of the contract by the financial processing module as a function of one or more first or second parameters further includes:

incorporating changes to financial terms of the contract by adding to or removing from the one or more rules.

29. A financial computing system for determining a payment under a contract, the system comprising:

a financial computing module for modeling financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more parameters, each of the one or more parameters represented as a separate decision tree;

the financial computing module for representing each decision tree associated with the contract in a format suitable for computer implemented traversal;

the financial computing module for receiving details of a financial transaction governed by the contract;

the financial computing module for traversing each decision tree associated with each of the one or more parameters based on the received details of the financial transaction to determine a value for each of the one or more parameters; and

the financial computing module for determining the payment according to financial terms specified in the contract, the payment calculated as a function of the determined transaction values of the one or more parameters.

30. The financial processing system as recited in claim 29, wherein the modeling includes:

determining if contractual terms are for usages, rates, or modification factors;

identifying contractual conditions;

constructing decision tree branches based on identified contractual conditions;

constructing leaf nodes; and

filling in usages, rates or modification factors.

31. The financial processing system as recited in claim 29, wherein said modeling financial terms of the contract by the financial computing module as a function of one or more first or second parameters further includes:

providing a graphical user interface to enable a user to map information from the contract into a template; and

automatically generating the decision tree representation via the mapped information that is used to model the financial terms of a contact.

32. The financial processing system as recited in claim 29, wherein the financial computing module uses Hadoop software for implementing a distributed file system.

33. The financial processing system as recited in claim 29, wherein the financial computing module uses a Map Reduce computing model for processing the financial transaction.

34. A financial computing system for determining a payment under a contract, the system comprising:

a financial computing module for modeling financial terms of the contract as a function of one or more first parameters, each of the one or more first parameters being a function of one or more second parameters, each of the one or more first or second parameters associated with one or more rules, wherein each rule represents terms of the contract as a set of a plurality of conditions and associated plurality of actions, each of the plurality of actions being performed when a corresponding plurality of conditions is satisfied.

35. The financial processing system as recited in claim 34, wherein the financial terms of a contract are determined by the financial processing module by decomposing a contract into a plurality of contract templates, each contract template representing a predetermined plurality of financial terms.

36. The financial processing system as recited in claim 34, wherein said modeling financial terms of the contract by the financial processing module as a function of one or more first or second parameters further includes:

incorporating changes to financial terms of the contract by adding to or removing from the one or more rules.

37. The financial processing system as recited in claim 34, wherein for each of the first or second parameters, a contract rule-engine module interprets the relationship between the one or more rules associated with the given parameter.

38. The financial processing system as recited in claim 37, wherein the contract rule-engine module includes one or more of:

a decision table;

or

a rule engine.

39. The financial processing system as recited in claim 34, wherein the contract modeled by the financial processing module is associated with a sale or purchase of electric power, further wherein the contract for sale or purchase of power includes one or more first or second parameters, the one or more first or second parameters including:

a committed rate;

or

a committed load base rate.

40. The financial processing system as recited in claim 34, wherein the contract modeled by the financial processing module is associated with a music license, further wherein the contract for music license includes one or more first or second parameters, the one or more first or second parameters including:

an effective royalty rate;

an effective unit;

an escalation rate;

a basic US rate;

a channel reduction rate;

or

a territory reduction rate.