RECONFIGURABLE INTERFACE-BASED ELECTRICAL ARCHITECTURE

• US 20120265359A1
• Filed: 04/13/2011
• Published: 10/18/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 04/13/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Inventors: DAS, Dipankar, AGRAWAL, Vinod Kumar, RAJAPPAN, Seetharaman
• Granted Patent: US 8,930,036 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 700/292
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/0297 Control Giving priority to different actuators or systems
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/042 using digital processors G05B19/05 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 13/00 Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units interface circuits for specific input/output devices G06F3/00 ; multiprogram control therefor G06F9/46; multiprocessor systems G06F15/16
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 13/42 Bus transfer protocol, e.g. handshake; Synchronisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 15/025 adapted to a specific application
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/40032 Details regarding a bus interface enhancer
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/40195 by using a plurality of nodes
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0668 by dynamic selection of recovery network elements, e.g. replacement by the most appropriate element after failure
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0695 the faulty arrangement being the maintenance, administration or management system

Abstract

An electrical network architecture including a reconfigurable interface layer, along with a corresponding reconfiguration methodology. The interface layer is comprised of reconfigurable interface devices which allow a plurality of sensors and actuators to communicate with a plurality of control units. Each sensor or actuator is connected to multiple interface devices, which in turn are connected to a bus. The control units are also connected to the bus. In the event of an interface device failure, other interface devices can be reconfigured to maintain communication between sensors, actuators and control units. In the event of a control unit failure, the interface devices can be reconfigured to route sensor and actuator message traffic to a different control unit which can handle the functions of the failed control unit. The overall number of control units can also be reduced, as each control unit has flexible access to many sensors and actuators.

Claims

1. An automatically reconfigurable electrical network for a system, said network comprising:

a plurality of sensors and actuators, where the sensors measure parameters of the system and the actuators perform an action in the system;

two or more electronic control units (ECUs) for processing data from the sensors and issuing commands to the actuators;

two or more interface devices for connecting the sensors and actuators to the ECUs, said interface devices being software-reconfigurable to modify connectivity; and

a communications bus for carrying messages between the interface devices and the ECUs.

2. The network of claim 1 wherein the ECUs monitor the network to detect an ECU failure or an interface device failure.

3. The network of claim 1 wherein each of the ECUs is configured to be capable of executing tasks which normally run on the other ECUs.

4. The network of claim 1 wherein each of the interface devices includes a communication controller, a reconfigurable channel use table, and a reconfigurable message table.

5. The network of claim 4 wherein the channel use table for each of the interface devices can be reconfigured by a command from one of the ECUs to modify input and output channel activity.

6. The network of claim 5 wherein the channel use table for one of the interface devices is reconfigured if one of the other interface devices fails.

7. The network of claim 4 wherein the message table for each of the interface devices can be reconfigured by a command from one of the ECUs to modify message source and destination device identifiers.

8. The network of claim 7 wherein the message table for one of the interface devices is reconfigured if one of the ECUs fails.

9. The network of claim 4 wherein the communication controller in each of the interface devices uses information in the channel use table and the message table to route messages from the sensors to the ECUs and from the ECUs to the actuators.

10. The network of claim 1 wherein the system is a vehicle.

11. A reconfigurable electrical network, said network comprising:

one or more microcontrollers for processing data from sensors and issuing commands to actuators; and

two or more interface devices for connecting the sensors and the actuators to the microcontrollers, said interface devices being software-reconfigurable to modify connectivity.

12. The network of claim 11 wherein each of the microcontrollers and each of the interface devices is equipped with a wireless transceiver such that each of the microcontrollers can wirelessly communicate with each of the interface devices.

13. The network of claim 11 wherein each of the interface devices is integrated with one of the microcontrollers in an electronic control unit (ECU).

14. The network of claim 11 further comprising a communications bus, said interface devices being connected to the communications bus.

15. A method for reconfiguring an electrical network, said network including first and second interface devices which handle communications between a sensor/actuator layer of the network and an electronic control unit (ECU) layer of the network, said method comprising:

monitoring operation of the network to detect an interface device failure or an ECU failure;

reconfiguring the first or second interface device to route sensor/actuator message traffic to a first ECU upon detection of a failure of a second ECU; and

reconfiguring the first interface device to handle message traffic previously handled by the second interface device upon detection of a failure of the second interface device.

16. The method of claim 15 further comprising activating a task on the first ECU upon detection of a failure of the second ECU, where the task was previously executed on the second ECU.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein reconfiguring the first or second interface device to route sensor/actuator message traffic to a first ECU upon detection of a failure of a second ECU includes sending a message from the first ECU to the first or second interface device instructing the first or second interface device how to reconfigure.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein reconfiguring the first or second interface device includes modifying a message table which contains a mapping of devices in the sensor/actuator layer with the first and second ECU.

19. The method of claim 15 wherein reconfiguring the first interface device to handle message traffic previously handled by the second interface device upon detection of a failure of the second interface device includes sending a message from the first or second ECU to the first interface device instructing the first interface device how to reconfigure.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein reconfiguring the first interface device includes modifying a channel use table which indicates which input and output channels should be used by the first interface device, and modifying a message table which contains a mapping of devices in the sensor/actuator layer with the first and second ECU.