VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM

• US 20120268603A1
• Filed: 04/20/2011
• Published: 10/25/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 04/20/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Peter Sarna II
• Original Assignee: Peter Sarna II
• Inventors: Sarna, Peter II
• Application Number:
  US13/090,958
• Publication Number:
  US 20120268603A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 348/152
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 7/181 for receiving images from a plurality of remote sources

Abstract

A system and method are disclosed. The system includes an user security portal operable to access live video feeds of areas of interest taken by a video camera. The user security portal includes an user interface operable to display an evaluation cycle. The evaluation cycle includes a security display window which displays the live video feeds of the monitored areas. In addition, the security display window includes evaluation parameters associated with the monitored areas and contingency action parameters which list action items to be taken in the event of a security breach of at least one evaluation parameters.

Claims

1. A system, comprising:

an user security portal operable to access at least one live video feed of at least one area taken by at least one video camera, wherein said user security portal includes;

an user interface operable to display at least one evaluation cycle, wherein said at least one evaluation cycle comprises at least one security display window, wherein each security display window displays at least one of said live video feeds, a plurality of evaluation parameters associated with said at least one area, and a plurality of contingency action parameters which lists action items to be taken in an event of a security breach of at least one of said plurality of evaluation parameters.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein security personnel responds to said security breach according to said plurality of contingency action parameters and judgment of said security personnel.

3. The system of claim 1 further comprising a first user selection prompt selectable to indicate that at least one of said plurality of evaluation parameters are violated and a second user selection prompt selectable to indicate that all of said plurality of evaluation parameters are in compliance, wherein said first user selection prompt and said second selection prompt are displayed within each security display window.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein said second user selection prompt further indicates that additional action needs to be taken although none of said plurality of evaluation parameters are violated based on said judgment of said security personnel.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein said security personnel may run the evaluation cycle by utilizing said user security portal.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein said security personnel runs said at least one evaluation cycle by activating a security surveillance session.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein said at least one video camera is a network video camera.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein said evaluation cycle displays at least one of said live video feeds for a minimum of five seconds.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein said security personnel are aided in determining whether said breach has occurred by evaluating said at least one area in view of said plurality of evaluation parameters.

10. A system, comprising:

an user security portal operable to access at least one live video feed of at least one area taken by at least one video camera, wherein said user security portal includes;

an user interface operable to display at least one evaluation cycle, wherein said at least one evaluation cycle comprises at least one security display window, wherein each security display window displays at least one of said live video feeds, a plurality of evaluation parameters associated with said at least one area, and a plurality of contingency action parameters which lists action items to be taken in an event of a security breach of at least one of said plurality of evaluation parameters, wherein security personnel utilizes judgment and at least one of said evaluation parameters to determine whether said security breach has occurred.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein said security personnel responds to said breach according to at least one of said plurality of contingency action parameters and judgment, knowledge, and discretion of said security personnel.

12. A system, comprising:

a system administrator workstation operable to allow an user to perform any of managing user profiles, managing at least one video camera feed, creating and managing at least one evaluation cycle by configuring at least one evaluation parameter, at least one video camera selection, and at least one notification information, wherein said at least one evaluation cycle includes;

at least one security display window, wherein each security display window displays at least one of said live video feed of said at least one area, said at least one evaluation parameter associated with said at least one area, and at least one contingency action parameter which lists action items to be taken in an event of a security breach of said at least one evaluation parameter, wherein security personnel responds to said security breach according to said at least one contingency action parameter and judgment of said security personnel.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein said security personnel utilizes any of judgment, knowledge, discretion, and at least one of said evaluation parameters to determine whether said breach has occurred.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein said at least one contingency action parameter is any of notifying security patrol;

describing persons, activity and direction of travel;

continuing to monitor and update responding security personnel; and

calling emergency help if necessary.

15. A method, comprising:

operating an user security portal operable to access at least one live video feed of at least one area taken by at least one video camera, wherein said user security portal includes;

operating an user interface to display at least one evaluation cycle, wherein said at least one evaluation cycle includes at least one security display window, wherein each security display window displays at least one of said live video feeds of said at least one area, a plurality of evaluation parameters associated with said at least one area, and a plurality of contingency action parameters which recommend action items to be taken in an event of a security breach of at least one of said plurality of evaluation parameters, wherein security personnel responds to said security breach according to said plurality of contingency action parameters and judgment of said security personnel.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein operating said user security portal includes requiring a user to log in.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein said user security portal has a plurality of permission levels.

18. A method, comprising:

performing an evaluation test during an evaluation cycle, wherein performing said evaluation test includes;

displaying a test video feed during said evaluation cycle, wherein security personnel are able to indicate whether said test video feed is in compliance with security protocol according to at least one evaluation parameter and judgment of said security personnel.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein an error message is issued in an event that said security personnel fails to correctly address said test video feed according to a default setting of said evaluation cycle.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein said test video feed is displayed before and after a live video feed.