SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING SUITABILITY OF REAL ESTATE

• US 20120284202A1
• Filed: 05/06/2011
• Published: 11/08/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 05/06/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Find A Home Corporation
• Original Assignee: Find A Home Corporation
• Inventors: Dalby, Timothy James
• Application Number:
  US13/103,019
• Publication Number:
  US 20120284202A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/313
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/16 Real estate

Abstract

Systems and methods relating to the determination of notable locations around a specific address. The notable locations within a predetermined radius of the specific address are mapped and noted. Each notable location within that radius contributes (either increases or decreases) a score for a particular category. Each category relates to a particular concern that might relate to a specific demographic or segment of the population. The score for each category is then presented to a user. The user may also enter a ranking of the various categories and specific addresses whose scores are in line with the user'"'"'s ranking may also be presented to the user. The notable locations around a specific address may be found in a database supplied by the municipality or any other source or may be derived from a digital map of the area.

Claims

1. A method for determining a suitability of a real estate property for a specific user, the method comprising:

a) receiving an address for said real estate property;

b) determining which notable locations are within a predetermined radius of said address;

c) for each notable location within said radius, adding to a score to at least one of a plurality of predetermined categories; and

d) providing said score for each of the plurality of categories to said user.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said notable locations includes at least one of the following:

bus stations;

centers of worship;

religious centers;

bus stops;

train stations;

subway stations;

restaurants;

schools;

libraries;

community centers;

fitness centers;

universities;

colleges;

grocery stores;

shops;

shopping malls;

law enforcement facilities;

police stations;

highway access onramps;

highway access offramps;

hospitals;

clinics;

jails;

homeless shelters;

drug stores.

3. A method according to claim 1 wherein each type of notable location adds a different amount to said score.

4. A method according to claim 1 wherein said plurality of predetermined categories includes at least one of the following:

family friendliness;

public transport;

health care;

safety;

or

young adult amenities.

5. A method according to claim 1 wherein step b) comprises:

retrieving data for each notable location from a database;

for each notable location, executing the following steps;

determining a distance from said address to said notable location;

determining if said notable location is within said predetermined radius.

6. A method according to claim 1 wherein step b) comprises:

retrieving a map of an area including said address;

determining notable locations from said map;

for each notable location from said map, executing the following steps;

determining a distance from said address to said notable location;

determining if said notable location is within said predetermined radius.

7. A method according to claim 1 wherein said method includes the step of:

receiving a ranking input from said user, said ranking input being a ranking of said predetermined categories by said user.

8. A method according to claim 7 wherein said method is executed for a plurality of addresses, said plurality of addresses being in different areas of a municipality.

9. A method according to claim 8 wherein said plurality of addresses are ranked based on scores for each address for each of said categories such that said addresses are ranked in a ranking similar to said ranking input from said user.

10. A method according to claim 1 wherein said method is executed for a plurality of addresses, said plurality of addresses being in different areas of a municipality.

11. A method according to claim 10 wherein said plurality of addresses are ranked based on scores for each address for each of said categories.

12. A method for ranking real estate property based on a plurality of predetermined categories, the method comprising:

a) determining a location of said real estate property;

b) determining notable locations within a predetermined radius of said real estate property;

c) for each notable location within said predetermined radius of said real estate property, adding a value to at least one category aggregate score, each category aggregate score being related to a predetermined category;

wherein

each predetermined category relates to a type of service available to a user of said real estate property.

13. A method according to claim 12 wherein each category aggregate score is an indication of convenience for said user of said real property to access said type of service from said real estate property.

14. A method according to claim 12 wherein said location of said real estate is a center of a region of a municipality.

15. A method according to claim 12 wherein each predetermined category also relates to notable locations within said predetermined radius which affect safety considerations for said user of said real estate property.