SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES FOR AGREEMENT MANGEMENT

• US 20120303535A1
• Filed: 09/19/2011
• Published: 11/29/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 05/25/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Frederick E. Guest III
• Original Assignee: Frederick E. Guest III
• Inventors: Guest, Frederick E. III
• Application Number:
  US13/236,500
• Publication Number:
  US 20120303535A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/80
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/18 Legal services

Abstract

A process and system of managing agreements among users is provided. A proposed agreement is received from a first user. The proposal is relayed to a second user to view and to choose whether to accept the proposal. The agreement specifies that, at a particular time, if a particular condition is met, one user will owe the other a payment. At the specified time, a user is asked whether the condition has been met. If it has, one user will owe the other the payment.

Claims

1. A process for managing a contractual agreement using a computer with a processor, the process comprising:

receiving, with the processor, a submission of information about an agreement from one or more submitting users;

wherein the agreement specifies that, if a particular condition is true at a specified time, a payment will be made from one or more paying users;

storing, with the processor, information about the agreement on non-transient storage media of the computer system; and

receiving, at the specified time, with the processor, input from one or more selected users that indicates whether the particular condition is true.

2. The process of claim 1, wherein the process is implemented by at least one device communicating directly with another device through a peer-to-peer network.

3. The process of claim 1, wherein the agreement further specifies that, if the particular condition is not true, an alternate payment will be made from one or more alternate paying users.

4. The process of claim 1, wherein the accepting a submission of an agreement comprises:

receiving, with the processor, from the one or more submitting users, a proposal for the agreement; and

receiving, with the processor, from one or more accepting users, an acceptance of the proposal for the agreement.

5. The process of claim 1, wherein the stored information about the agreement is stored in encrypted form.

6. The process of claim 1, further comprising:

requesting, with the processor, if input from the one or more selected users indicates that the particular condition is true, that the one or more paying users make the payment; and

suggesting, with the processor, that the one or more paying users make the payment by purchasing one or more offers in lieu of the payment.

7. The process of claim 6, further comprising:

offering, with the processor, if the one or more paying users agrees to purchase the one or more offers, a gift card to at least one receiving user in lieu of at least part of a payment due to the at least one receiving user.

8. The process of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving, with the processor, at least one suggested arbiter from at least one suggesting user;

receiving, with the processor, input from the at least one arbiter regarding whether the particular condition is true; and

deciding, with the processor, whether the one or more paying users should make the payment, based at least partially on the input from the at least one arbiter.

9. The process of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving, with the processor, at least one suggested arbiter from at least one suggesting user;

requesting, with the processor, that the at least one suggesting users suggest one or more different arbiters, if no at least one suggested arbiters was suggested by more than one of the at least one suggesting users;

receiving, with the processor, at least one newly suggested arbiter from at least one suggesting user, if no at least one suggested arbiters was suggested by more than one of the at least one suggesting users;

selecting, with the processor, one arbiter from the at least one suggested arbiter or the at least one newly suggested arbiter;

receiving, with the processor, input from the one arbiter regarding whether the particular condition is true; and

deciding, with the processor, whether the one or more paying users should make the payment, based at least partially on the input from the one arbiter.

10. The process of claim 8, further comprising:

receiving, with the processor, at least one suggested arbiter and a rank for each of the at least one suggested arbiter from at least one suggesting user;

selecting, with the processor, one arbiter from the at least one suggested arbiters;

wherein the arbiter is selected based at least in part on ranking received from the one or more users;

receiving, with the processor, input from the one arbiter regarding whether the particular condition is true; and

deciding, with the processor, whether the one or more paying users should make the payment, based at least partially on the input from the one arbiter.

15. The process of claim 1, wherein the stored information about the agreement is stored in encrypted form.

11. A computer-implemented system for managing a contractual agreement, the system comprising:

a storage medium for storing information about an agreement; and

a processor configured to;

store, in the storage medium, a submission of information about the agreement from one or more submitting users;

wherein the agreement specifies that, if a particular condition is true at a specified time, a payment will be made from one or more paying users; and

store, in the storage medium, at the specified time, input from one or more selected users that indicates whether the particular condition is true occurred.

12. A system of claim 11, wherein the system is implemented by at least one device communicating directly with another device through a peer-to-peer network.

13. The system of claim 11, wherein the agreement further specifies that, if the particular condition is not true, a different payment will be made from one or more different paying users.

14. The system of claim 11, wherein the accepting a submission of an agreement includes that the processor is configured to:

store, in the storage medium, a proposal for the agreement from the one or more submitting users; and

store, in the storage medium, an acceptance of the proposal for the agreement from one or more accepting users.

16. The system of claim 11, the processor further configured to:

request, if input from the one or more selected users indicates that the particular condition is true, that the one or more paying users make the payment; and

suggest that the one or more paying users make the payment by purchasing an offer in lieu of the payment.

17. The system of claim 16, the processor further configured to:

offer, if the one or more paying users agrees to purchase the one or more offers, a gift card to at least one receiving user in lieu of at least part of a payment due to the at least one receiving user.

18. The system of claim 11, the processor further configured to:

accept at least one suggested arbiter from at least one suggesting user;

store, in the storage medium, input from the at least one arbiter regarding whether the particular condition is true; and

decide whether the one or more paying users should make the payment, based at least partially on the input from the at least one arbiter.

19. The system of claim 18, the processor further configured to:

accept at least one suggested arbiter from at least one suggesting user;

request that the at least one suggesting users suggest one or more different arbiters, if none of the at least one suggested arbiter was suggested by more than one of the at least one suggesting user;

accept at least one newly suggested arbiter from at least one suggesting user, if none of the at least one suggested arbiter was suggested by more than one of the at least one suggesting user;

select one arbiter from the at least one suggested arbiter or the at least one newly suggested arbiter;

store, in the storage medium, input from the one arbiter regarding whether the particular condition is true; and

decide whether the one or more paying users should make the payment, based at least partially on the input from the one arbiter.

20. The system of claim 18, the processor further configured to:

accept at least one suggested arbiter and a rank of each of the at least one suggested arbiter from at least one suggesting user;

select one arbiter from the suggested arbiters;

wherein the one arbiter is selected based at least in part on the ranking received from the at least one suggesting user;

store, in the storage medium, input from the one arbiter regarding whether the specified particular is true; and

decide whether the one or more paying users should make the payment, based at least partially on the input from the one arbiter.