ENGINE NOISE MONITORING AS ENGINE HEALTH MANAGEMENT TOOL

• US 20120323531A1
• Filed: 06/14/2011
• Published: 12/20/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 06/14/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (Raytheon Technologies Corporation d/b/a RTX)
• Original Assignee: Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (Raytheon Technologies Corporation d/b/a RTX)
• Inventors: Pascu, Victor, Francisco, Jay M.
• Granted Patent: US 8,843,348 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/184
• CPC Class Codes: F01D 17/02 Arrangement of sensing elements
• CPC Class Codes: F05D 2260/80 Diagnostics
• CPC Class Codes: F05D 2270/707 fuzzy logic
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 13/028 Acoustic or vibration analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 15/00 Testing of engines

Abstract

A system and method are provided for determining the health of an engine. The method includes a plurality of standard noise spectra collected from engines with known defects. A noise spectrum of the engine being monitored is sensed and compared to the plurality of standard noise spectra from the engines with known defects. From the comparison, a type and a degree of defect is identified based upon the comparison.

Claims

1. A method for determining the health of an engine comprising:

sensing a noise spectrum of the engine;

comparing the noise spectrum of the engine to a plurality of standard noise spectra from engines with known defects stored in a database; and

identifying a type and a degree of defect based upon the comparison.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

generating a match alert along with applicable recommended action if one or more defects are identified by a computer system based on a pattern match between the noise spectrum of the engine and one or more of the plurality of standard noise spectra.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the computer system generated applicable recommended action is derived from component reliability information, known failure modes, and maintenance recommendations from a maintenance manual of the engine.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the computer system generated applicable recommended action is based upon a cost/benefit analysis that takes into account a business model of the user.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the engine and the engines with known defects are identical models and the noise spectrum of the engine and the plurality of standard noise spectra from the engines with known defects are collected at a same or substantially similar operating condition.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

comparing the noise spectrum of the engine to a standard noise spectrum from a reference engine known to be operating without defects stored in the database to identify that defects are present.

7. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

generating a notification that one or more defects are likely present if the noise spectrum of the engine and the standard noise spectrum from the reference engine known to be operating without defects are determined not to be an acceptable match based on a pattern recognition by a computer system.

8. A method for determining the health of an engine comprising:

sensing a noise spectrum of the engine;

comparing the noise spectrum of the engine to both a standard noise spectra of a reference engine known to be operating without defects and a plurality of standard noise spectra from engines with known defects; and

identifying an existence, a type, and a degree of defect based upon the comparison.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

generating a match alert along with applicable recommended action if one or more defects are identified by a computer system based on a pattern match between the noise spectrum of the engine and one or more of the plurality of standard noise spectra.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the computer system generated applicable recommended action is derived from component reliability information, known failure modes, and maintenance recommendations from a maintenance manual of the engine.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the computer system generated recommended action is based upon a cost/benefit analysis that takes into account a business model of the user.

12. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

generating a notification that one or more defects are likely present if the noise spectrum of the engine and the standard noise spectrum from the reference engine known to be operating without defects are determined not to be an acceptable match based on a pattern recognition by a computer system.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein the engine and the engines with known defects are identical model engines and the noise spectrum of the engine and the plurality of standard noise spectra from the engines with known defects are collected at a same or substantially similar operating condition.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein the engine and the reference engine known to be operating without defects are identical model engines and the noise spectrum of the engine and the standard noise spectra of the reference engine known to be operating without defects are collected at a same or substantially similar operating condition.

15. A system for monitoring the health of an engine comprising:

an acoustic sensor configured to acquire a noise spectrum of the engine; and

a computer system including a database having a plurality of stored standard noise spectra from engines with known defects, the computer system configured to receive the acquired noise spectrum of the engine from the acoustic sensor and compare the noise spectrum of the engine to the plurality of standard noise spectra from engines with known defects so as to identify a type and a degree of defect based upon the comparison, the computer system generating a match alert along with an applicable recommended action on a display if one or more defects are indentified.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the acoustic sensor communicates with an aircraft condition monitoring system which indentifies the condition of the engine E and identifies when data collection from acoustic sensor and a plurality of other sensors should occur based upon desired engine operating conditions, aircraft condition monitoring system includes a data acquisition system which is dedicated to the acquisition and real time collection of aircraft data including data from acoustic sensor and the plurality of other sensors.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein the database stores a standard noise spectrum from a reference engine known to be operating without defects and the computer system compares the noise spectrum of the engine to the standard noise spectrum from the reference engine known to be operating without defects to ascertain whether any defects are present.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the computer system generates a notification that one or more defects are likely present on the display if the noise spectrum of the engine and the standard noise spectrum from the reference engine known to be operating without defects are determined not to be an acceptable match based on a pattern recognition.

19. The system of claim 15, wherein the computer system generated applicable recommended action is derived from component reliability information, known failure modes, and maintenance recommendations from a maintenance manual of the engine.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the computer system generated applicable recommended action is based upon a cost/benefit analysis that takes into account a business model of the user.