OPTIMIZATION OF YIELD FOR ADVERTISING INVENTORY

• US 20130006730A1
• Filed: 09/26/2011
• Published: 01/03/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 06/28/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Sintecmedia, Nyc, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Sintecmedia, Nyc, Inc.
• Inventors: Jaye, Daniel, Secretan, Jimmy
• Granted Patent: US 9,785,955 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/14.4
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

Methods and apparatus, including computer program products, for optimization of yield for advertising inventory. A method includes, in a network of interconnected computers, sending a request for a file from a browser residing on a user system to a publisher server, receiving the requested file from the publisher server, the requested file including instructions for the browser to request a site file from a rules server, receiving the site file in the browser, the site file including rules for deciding whether an advertising impression is desired, rules for valuing the advertising impression, and browser executable code that applies and evaluates the rules, executing the browser executable code to evaluate the rules from the site file which determine if one or more signals should be attached to an advertisement request, and selecting an advertisement from a network ad server based on a signal received with the advertisement request from the browser.

Claims

1. A method including:

in a network of interconnected computers, sending a request for a file from a browser residing on a user system to a publisher server;

receiving the requested file from the publisher server, the requested file including instructions for the browser to request a site file from a rules server;

receiving the site file in the browser, the site file including rules for deciding whether an advertising impression is desired, rules for valuing the advertising impression, and browser executable code that applies and evaluates the rules;

executing the browser executable code to evaluates the rules from the site file which determine if one or more signals should be attached to an advertisement request; and

selecting an advertisement from a network ad server based on a signal received with the advertisement request from the browser.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on data about the browser gathered over time and across multiple servers in the network.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on characteristics of the ad request.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on how many times each signal has previously been included in ad requests from the browser to the publisher ad server.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on how many times each signal has previously been included in ad requests from the browser to the publisher ad server.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on one or more characteristics of content within which the advertisement is displayed, including the Universal Resource Locator (URL) or other unique identifier of the content, codes that correlate to a subject, nature and format of the content, an identity and role of a business entity in an authorship, production, edition and distribution of the content.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on a location and placement of the advertisement within content.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on a geographic location of the browser.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on rules which cause the signals to be included on only a percentage of the ad requests when the signal would otherwise have been included.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules in the site file received in the browser depend on rules which cause the signals to be included on the ad requests when a combination of available data predict a likelihood of a specific goal above a threshold.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the available data is selected from the group consisting of data about the browser, ad request characteristics, content characteristics, characteristics of the actual advertising message, and a number of times the signal was previously included.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein the goal is a purchase transaction conducted using the browser.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein the goal is a purchase transaction linked to the available data but not conducted using the browser , including purchases made using other communications channels or in person.

14. The method of claim 10 wherein the threshold for including the signal based on a prediction also depends on a value assigned to the goal.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein files subsequently requested from the publisher server are retrieved from a locally cached copy of the site file if the subsequent requests happen within a prescribed period of time.

16. The method of claim 1 further including:

requesting additional files from the publisher server; and

receiving a locally cached copy of the site file if the subsequent requests happen within a prescribed period of time.

17. The method of claim 1 wherein the site file further comprises instructions that determine how often new data about the browser should be retrieved.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein the site file is a cached copy that loads new data without rules evaluation code.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein the site file further comprises instructions that determine how often new rules and data about the browser should be retrieved.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the site file is a cached copy that loads new rules and data without the rules evaluation code.

21. The method of claim 1 wherein the site file further comprises instructions that determine how often new data about the browser should be requested from one or more third party data sources.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein the rules indicate that new third party data are needed and data from the one or more third party sources is requested and the browser records in local temporary storage an attribute that indicates that new data about the browser is available and a new copy of the site file must be retrieved from the rules server.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein the browser retrieves the new third party data by requesting a rules file with the new data without the rules evaluation code from the rules server.

24. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules server is deployed in one or more locations selected to reduce latency of responding to requests from the browser.

25. The method of claim 1 wherein the rules server inserts data into the site file to which the rules server has access but which code in the site file executing on the browser as part of content requested from the publisher server does not have access.

26. The method of claim 1 wherein the browser executes code in the site file to determine signals for all possible ad types it may encounter and sends those signals to the publisher ad server.

27. The method of claim 1 wherein the requested file is downloaded from a publisher ad server and the executable code in the site file instructs the browser to retrieve an advertisement from a network ad server.

28. The method of claim 27 further including retrieving a different advertisement from the publisher ad server if no signal is selected based on the rules.

29. The method of claim 27 further including retrieving a different advertisement from the publisher ad server if the highest value associated with each signal selected based on the rules is below a threshold established by a publisher.

30. The method of claim 1 wherein code executing in content markup language files retrieved from the rules server and the publisher server have access to different sets of locally stored data, a first request for the file executes code with access to locally stored data available to the publisher server and a second request for the file executes code with access to locally stored data available to the rules server.

31. A method including:

in a network of interconnected computers, requesting a file from a publisher server;

receiving the requested file in a browser, the requested file including instructions for the browser to request a tag file of executable code from a rules server; and

receiving the tag file including one section containing executable code and a second section containing content markup language with embedded executable code, the tag file containing instructions for the browser to ignore the section of the tag file containing the content markup language with embedded executable code when the browser is processing the file as the executable code, the section with the executable code surrounded by characters indicating that the browser should ignore that section when the browser is processing the tag file as a content markup language file.

32. The method of claim 31 wherein a second request for the tag file as a document markup language file retrieves a locally stored copy of the tag file.