METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRECLUDING OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ACCIDENTAL TOUCH INPUTS

• US 20130050133A1
• Filed: 08/30/2011
• Published: 02/28/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 08/30/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Nokia Corporation
• Original Assignee: Nokia Corporation
• Inventors: Brakensiek, Jrg, Bose, Raja
• Application Number:
  US13/221,344
• Publication Number:
  US 20130050133A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 345/174
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2203/04106 Multi-sensing digitiser, i.e. digitiser using at least two different sensing technologies simultaneously or alternatively, e.g. for detecting pen and finger, for saving power or for improving position detection
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0416 Control or interface arrangements specially adapted for digitisers

Abstract

An apparatus, method, and computer program product are described that provide for a determination of the validity of an input based, at least in part, on a force indication relating to the input received and a proximity indication. An operation associated with the input may be precluded (e.g., the input may be disregarded) based, at least in part, on a determination that the input is invalid. When the input is determined to be valid, on the other hand, the associated operation may be executed. As a result, the execution of operations that are unintended (such as operations that are associated with accidental contact with the touch screen display) may be minimized, and the user'"'"'s experience with the device can be enhanced.

Claims

1. An apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to at least:

receive an input via a touch screen display;

receive a force indication relating to the input received;

receive a proximity indication in response to receiving the input;

determine a validity of the input based, at least in part, on the proximity indication and the force indication; and

provide for preclusion of an operation associated with the input based, at least in part, on a determination that the input is invalid.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory and computer program code are configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to determine the validity of the input based, at least in part, on a comparison of the force indication with a threshold force value.

3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the threshold force value is based, at least in part, on the proximity indication.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory and computer program code are configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to determine the validity of the input based, at least in part, on a comparison of the proximity indication with a threshold proximity value.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory and computer program code are configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to provide for execution of the operation associated with the input based, at least in part, on a determination that the input is valid.

6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the operation is associated with a force input, and wherein the memory and computer program code are further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to provide for the execution of the operation based, at least in part, on the force indication.

7. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the memory and computer program code are further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to receive a position indication relating to the input received and to provide for execution of the operation associated with the input based, at least in part, on the position indication.

8. A method comprising:

receiving an input via a touch screen display of an apparatus;

receiving a force indication relating to the input received;

receiving a proximity indication in response to receiving the input;

determining a validity of the input based, at least in part, on the proximity indication and the force indication; and

providing for preclusion of an operation associated with the input based, at least in part, on a determination that the input is invalid.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein determining the validity of the input comprises comparing the force indication with a threshold force value.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the threshold force value is based, at least in part, on the proximity indication.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein determining the validity of the input comprises comparing the proximity indication with a threshold proximity value.

12. The method of claim 8 further comprising providing for execution of the operation associated with the input based, at least in part, on a determination that the input is valid.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the operation is associated with a force input, and wherein providing for the execution of the operation comprises providing for the execution of the operation based, at least in part, on the force indication.

14. The method of claim 12 further comprising receiving a position indication relating to the input received and providing for execution of the operation associated with the input based, at least in part, on the position indication.

15. A computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code portions stored therein, the computer-executable program code portions comprising program code instructions for:

receiving an input via a touch screen display of an apparatus;

receiving a force indication relating to the input received;

receiving a proximity indication in response to receiving the input;

determining a validity of the input based, at least in part, on the proximity indication and the force indication; and

providing for preclusion of an operation associated with the input based, at least in part, on a determination that the input is invalid.

16. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein determining the validity of the input comprises comparing the force indication with a threshold force value.

17. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein the threshold force value is based, at least in part, on the proximity indication.

18. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein determining the validity of the input comprises comparing the proximity indication with a threshold proximity value.

19. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein providing for execution of an operation associated with the input is based, at least in part, on a determination that the input is valid.

20. The computer program product of claim 19, wherein the operation is associated with a force input, and wherein providing for the execution of the operation comprises providing for the execution of the operation based, at least in part, on the force indication.

21. The computer program product of claim 19 further comprising program code instructions for receiving a position indication relating to the input received and providing for execution of the operation associated with the input based, at least in part, on the position indication.