SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOAD BALANCING IN A COMMUNICATION NETWORK

• US 20130052989A1
• Filed: 08/24/2011
• Published: 02/28/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 08/24/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Radisys Corporation (Reliance Industries Limited)
• Original Assignee: Radisys Corporation (Reliance Industries Limited)
• Inventors: Mahalingam, Nagi Jayaraman
• Application Number:
  US13/216,774
• Publication Number:
  US 20130052989A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 455/411
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/06 Authentication
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 84/045 using private Base Stations, e.g. femto Base Stations, home Node B

Abstract

A system and method for achieving load balancing in a communication network. Each User Equipment (UE) configured to a Femto Access Point (FAP) is grouped under a particular access class based on the quality of service being subscribed to, by the UE. At the time of overloading, each access class is barred access for a particular percent of duty cycle. When an authorized UE requests connection to the FAP, the system checks for an overloading situation. If overloading is detected in the network, the system identifies the access class of that particular UE and checks if that particular access class is authorized to access the FAP at that particular instant of time. If the UE'"'"'s access class is authorized to access the FAP at that instant of time, the system allow UE to establish connection.

Claims

1. A method for a User Equipment (UE) to connect to a Femto Access Point (FAP) in a Femto network, said method comprising:

checking if said UE belongs to an authorized class by said FAP, on said FAP receiving a request for a connection from said UE and said FAP detecting an overload in said Femto network;

permitting said UE to connect to said FAP, if said UE belongs to said authorized class; and

denying connection to said UE by said FAP, is said UE does not belong to said authorized class.

2. The method, as claimed in claim 1, wherein said method further comprises assigning a class to said UE by said FAP, on said UE attempting to connect to said FAP for first time.

3. The method, as claimed in claim 2, wherein said method further comprises checking if said UE is authorized to connect to said FAP, before assigning said class to said UE.

4. The method, as claimed in claim 2, wherein said FAP assigns said class to said UE based on a plurality of factors comprising:

quality of service expected by said UE; and

type of traffic from said UE.

5. The method, as claimed in claim 1, wherein said FAP cycles through classes assigned to a plurality of UEs.

6. The method, as claimed in claim 5, wherein said FAP cycles through classes assigned to a plurality of UEs using at least one of:

a round robin method;

a fair queuing method;

proportionally fair scheduling; and

a maximum throughput algorithm.

7. The method, as claimed in claim 1, wherein said method further comprises:

starting a timer by said UE, on said UE being denied connection to said FAP; and

re-attempting to connect to said FAP by said UE, on expiry of said timer.

8. A Femto Access Point (FAP) in a Femto network, said FAP comprising at least one means adapted for:

checking if a UE belongs to an authorized class by said FAP, on said FAP receiving a request for a connection from said UE and said FAP detecting an overload in said Femto network;

permitting said UE to connect to said FAP, if said UE belongs to said authorized class; and

denying connection to said UE by said FAP, is said UE does not belong to said authorized class.

9. The FAP, as claimed in claim 8, wherein said FAP is configured for assigning a class to said UE by said FAP, on said UE attempting to connect to said FAP for first time.

10. The FAP, as claimed in claim 9, wherein said FAP is configured for checking if said UE is authorized to connect to said FAP, before assigning said class to said UE.

11. The FAP, as claimed in claim 9, wherein said FAP is configured to assign said class to said UE based on a plurality of factors comprising:

quality of service expected by said UE; and

type of traffic from said UE.

12. The FAP, as claimed in claim 8, wherein said FAP is configured to cycle through classes assigned to a plurality of UEs.

13. The FAP, as claimed in claim 12, wherein said FAP is configured to cycle through classes assigned to a plurality of UEs using at least one of:

a round robin method;

a fair queuing method;

proportionally fair scheduling; and

a maximum throughput algorithm.