REMOTE COMPARISON OF A MAINTENANCE CONFIGURATION WITH AN ALLOWABLE CONFIGURATION

• US 20130054633A1
• Filed: 08/23/2011
• Published: 02/28/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 08/23/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: SAP SE
• Original Assignee: Christian Baust
• Inventors: BAUST, CHRISTIAN
• Application Number:
  US13/215,372
• Publication Number:
  US 20130054633A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/769
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Abstract

Various embodiments of systems and methods for remote comparison of a maintenance configuration with an allowable configuration are described herein. According to the technique, an operator of an asset sends an as-maintained configuration of the asset to a third party. The third party receives or has in store the as-allowed configuration of the same asset. The third party performs a configuration check of the as-maintained with the as-allowed configuration and provides results.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method for remotely comparing a first configuration to a second configuration of a composite object, the object maintained by an operator, the method comprising:

receiving an operator identification from the operator of the composite object at a remote server;

receiving data representing the first configuration from the operator of the composite object at the remote server;

comparing the first configuration with the second configuration of the composite object within the remote server;

determining a deviation between the first configuration and the second configuration of the composite object; and

presenting result data to the operator, the result data comprising the determined deviation.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first configuration is a maintenance configuration and the second configuration is an allowable configuration.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the data representing the first configuration is received at the remote server from a server of the operator.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing the first configuration with the second configuration further comprises:

extracting the second configuration from a repository, the second configuration indexed by the operator identification; and

comparing elements of the first configuration to corresponding elements of the second configuration.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the repository is contained in a database within the remote server.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the deviation between the first configuration and the second configuration of the composite object further comprises determining inconsistencies between elements of the first configuration and corresponding elements of the second configuration.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting the result data to the operator, further comprises sending a report to the operator, the report comprising the determined deviation between the first configuration and the second configuration of the composite object.

8. A computer system for remotely comparing a maintenance configuration to an allowable configuration of a composite object including at least one processor for executing program code and memory, the system comprising:

a remote server;

a receiving module within the remote server to receive an operator identification and data representing the maintenance configuration from an operator of the composite object;

a processing module within the remote server to compare the maintenance configuration with the allowable configuration and to determine a deviation between the maintenance configuration and the allowable configuration of the composite object; and

a reporting module to present result data to the operator, the result data comprising the determined deviation.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the processing module is further operable to extract the allowable configuration from a repository, the allowable configuration indexed by the operator identification.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein repository is contained in a database within the remote server.

11. The system of claim 8, wherein the processing module is further operable to compare elements of the maintenance configuration to corresponding elements of the allowable configuration.

12. The system of claim 8, wherein the processing module is further operable to determine inconsistencies between elements of the maintenance configuration and corresponding elements of the allowable configuration.

13. The system of claim 8, wherein the reporting module provides the result data to the operator in a report.

14. An article of manufacture including a non-transitory computer readable storage medium to tangibly store instructions, which when executed by a computer, cause the computer to:

receive an operator identification from an operator of a composite object at a remote server;

receive data representing a first configuration from the operator of the composite object at the remote server;

compare the first configuration with a second configuration of the composite object within the remote server;

determine a deviation between the first configuration and the second configuration of the composite object; and

present result data to the operator, the result data comprising the determined deviation.

15. The article of manufacture of claim 14, wherein the first configuration is a maintenance configuration and the second configuration is an allowable configuration.

16. The article of manufacture of claim 14, wherein the instructions to receive the data representing the first configuration from the operator of the composite object further comprise instructions, which when executed by a computer, cause the computer to receive the data representing the first configuration at the remote server from a server of the operator.

17. The article of manufacture of claim 14, wherein the instructions to compare the first configuration with the second configuration further comprise instructions, which when executed by a computer, cause the computer to:

extract the second configuration from a repository, the second configuration indexed by the operator identification; and

compare elements of the first configuration to corresponding elements of the second configuration.

18. The article of manufacture of claim 17, wherein the repository is contained in a database within the remote server.

19. The article of manufacture of claim 14, wherein the instructions to determine a deviation between the first configuration and the second configuration further comprise instructions, which when executed by a computer, cause the computer to determine inconsistencies between elements of the first configuration and corresponding elements of the second configuration.

20. The article of manufacture of claim 14, wherein the instructions to present the result data to the operator further comprise instructions, which when executed by a computer, cause the computer to send a report to the operator, the report comprising the determined deviation between the first configuration and the second configuration of the composite object.