ESTIMATING AND OPTIMIZING COST SAVINGS FOR LARGE SCALE DEPLOYMENTS USING LOAD PROFILE OPTIMIZATION

• US 20130060720A1
• Filed: 05/07/2012
• Published: 03/07/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 09/02/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hunt Energy IQ LP
• Original Assignee: Hunt Energy IQ LP
• Inventors: Burke, Robert
• Application Number:
  US13/465,326
• Publication Number:
  US 20130060720A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/412
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management

Abstract

A system, computer-implemented method, and a computer program product are provided for estimating and optimizing cost savings for large scale deployments using load profile optimization. Selections are received, via a user interface, of a primary load profile and multiple secondary load profiles. The primary load profile is input from a first external source and the multiple secondary load profiles are input from a second external source. The primary load profile is compared with the multiple secondary load profiles. The comparisons of the primary load profile and the multiple secondary load profiles are output via the user interface.

Claims

1. A system for estimating and optimizing cost savings for large scale deployments using load profile optimization, the system including:

a computer;

a memory;

a user interface; and

a computer program stored in the memory and executable by the computer to;

receive, via the user interface, selections of a primary load profile and multiple secondary load profiles;

input the primary load profile from a first external source and the multiple secondary load profiles from a second external source;

compare the primary load profile with the multiple secondary load profiles; and

output the comparisons of the primary load profile and the multiple secondary load profiles via the user interface.

2. A system as in claim 1, wherein the primary load profile is a static load profile and wherein each of the multiple secondary load profiles is a currently metered load profile.

3. A system as in claim 1, wherein the primary load profile is a currently metered primary load profile and wherein each of the multiple secondary load profiles is a currently metered load profile.

4. A system as in claim 1, wherein the first external source is the same as the second external source.

5. A system as in claim 1, wherein the comparison includes a cost differential based on the comparison of the primary load profile with at least one of the multiple secondary load profiles.

6. A system as in claim 1, wherein outputting the comparison includes graphically depicting comparison components that comprise the comparison during a time period.

7. A computer-implemented method for estimating and optimizing cost savings for large scale deployments using load profile optimization, the method including the steps of:

receiving, via a user interface by a computer program stored in a memory and executed by a computer, selections of a primary load profile and a secondary load profile;

inputting, by the computer program, the primary load profile from a first external source and the secondary load profile from a second external source;

comparing, by the computer program, the primary load profile with the secondary load profile;

calculating, by the computer program, a cost differential based on the comparison of the primary load profile with the secondary load profile and

outputting, by the computer program, the cost differential via the user interface.

8. A computer-implemented method as in claim 7, wherein each of the primary load profile and the secondary load profile is a currently metered load profile.

9. A computer-implemented method as in claim 7, wherein the first external source is the same as the second external source.

10. A computer-implemented method as in claim 7, wherein calculating the cost differential includes using utility provider information and tariff information associated with the secondary load profile.

11. A computer-implemented method as in claim 7, wherein calculating the cost differential includes enabling a user to select utility provider information and tariff information to be applied to the secondary load profile.

12. A computer-implemented method as in claim 7, wherein calculating the cost differential is based on a complex time-of-use tariff.

13. A computer-implemented method as in claim 7, wherein calculating the cost differential includes decomposing the cost differential into multiple cost drivers.

14. A computer-implemented method as in claim 7, wherein outputting the cost differential includes graphically depicting cost differential components that comprise the cost differential during a time period.

15. A computer-implemented method as in claim 7, wherein outputting the cost differential includes saving the comparison in a library for use as a cost differential.

16. A computer program product for estimating and optimizing cost savings for large scale deployments using load profile optimization, the computer program product including:

a computer readable storage medium storing computer executable program code that, when executed by a processor, causes the computer executable program code to perform a method including the steps of;

receiving, via a user interface, selections of a primary load profile and a secondary load profile, wherein the secondary load profile is a combination of currently metered constituent load profiles;

inputting the primary load profile from a first external source and the secondary load profile from a second external source;

comparing the primary load profile with the secondary load profile, wherein the secondary load profile is synchronized with the combination of currently metered constituent load profiles; and

outputting the comparison of the primary load profile and the secondary load profile via the user interface.

17. A computer program product as in claim 16, wherein the primary load profile is a currently metered load profile.

18. A computer program product as in claim 16, wherein the secondary load profile is based on one of text entered by a system user and calculations based on measurements of the metered constituent load profiles made by the computer executable program code.

19. A computer program product as in claim 16, wherein the first external source is the same as the second external source.

20. A computer program product as in claim 16, wherein the comparison includes a cost differential based on the comparison of the primary load profile with the secondary load profile.