METHOD OF PROSECUTING ACQUISITION OF RESPONSES TO A PROPOSITION, AND SYSTEM FOR DOING THE SAME

• US 20130085793A1
• Filed: 10/04/2011
• Published: 04/04/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 10/04/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Affirmify LLC
• Original Assignee: Affirmify LLC
• Inventors: Cooper, Marshall, Cooper, Wayne Evan
• Application Number:
  US13/253,055
• Publication Number:
  US 20130085793A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.15
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/101 Collaborative creation, e.g. joint development of products or services

Abstract

A method, of prosecuting acquisition of formal responses to a formal proposition put forth by a requestor, includes: electronically sending the proposition to a group of recipients; automatically tracking responses to the proposition; automatically determining statistics indicative of the tracked responses including a completion ratio; and electronically presenting to the requestor at least some of the statistics including the completion ratio.

Claims

1. A method of prosecuting acquisition of formal responses to a formal proposition put forth by a requestor, the method comprising:

electronically sending the proposition to a group of recipients;

automatically tracking responses to the proposition;

automatically determining statistics indicative of the tracked responses including a completion ratio; and

electronically presenting to the requestor at least some of the statistics including the completion ratio.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the statistics include a count of responses received; and

the completion ratio is based upon the count and a total number of sent requests.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the ratio is presented as a percentage.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of electronically presenting includes:

displaying a chart representing the ratio.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the chart is a bar graph.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

configuring an electronic representation of the proposition to include,

a written definition of a subject of the proposition, and

a written definition of an affirmation being sought as a desired response to the proposition.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein a configuration of the electronic representation of the proposition further includes:

a solicitation that a response be made in a form of an electronic communication of the affirmation to the requestor.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

automatically sending, to those amongst the recipients for which a response has not been received, respectively, electronic prompts notifying that a response is awaited.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

establishing a schedule for prosecuting the acquisition including, setting one or more reminder dates

wherein the electronic prompts are sent on the one or more reminder dates.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein:

there are at least first and second reminder dates and at least first and second corresponding prompts, respectively; and

the step of establishing the schedule further includes,

drafting different messages to be communicated by the at least first and second prompts, respectively.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein:

the second prompt is drafted so as to communicate an escalating sense of urgency relative to the first prompt.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein:

the prompts includes at least one of a qualitative and a quantitative indication of an interval elapsed since the proposition was sent.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein:

at least first and second propositions are sent electronically to at least first and second groups of recipients, respectively,

at least first and second sets of responses to the at least first and second propositions are automatically tracked, respectively;

at least first and second sets of statistics are automatically determined for the at least first and second sets of responses, respectively; and

the method further comprises,

displaying a synopsis of progress-statuses regarding at least first and second acquisitions of responses to at least the least first and second propositions, respectively.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein:

there is a recipient who is common to the first and second groups; and

the method further comprises,

displaying a summary regarding progress-statuses for the common recipient including indications of whether the common recipient has responded to the first and second propositions, respectively.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the summary includes at least one of:

dates, if available, on which the responses were received, respectively;

qualitative indications of intervals elapsed since the propositions were sent, respectively;

quantitative indications of intervals elapsed since the propositions were sent, respectively.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein the statistics includes

a summary of overdue responses;

a summary of recipients for which there is a problem with delivery of the propositions, respectively;

a summary of a subset of higher-priority propositions; and

a summary of a subset of most delinquent recipients.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the statistics includes

a summary of overdue responses;

a summary of recipients for which there is a problem with delivery of the propositions, respectively; and

a summary of a subset of most delinquent recipients.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the method is implemented as software as a service (Saas).

19. A method of prosecuting generation of formal responses by a recipient to propositions put forth by one or more requestors, the method comprising:

electronically sending at least first and second propositions to at least first and second groups of recipients;

automatically tracking at least first and second sets of responses to the at least first and second propositions; and

automatically determining at least first and second statistics indicative of the at least first and second sets of tracked responses;

wherein there is a recipient who is common to the first and second groups; and

wherein the method further comprises,

electronically presenting to the common recipient a summary regarding progress-statuses including indications of whether the common recipient has responded to the first and second propositions, respectively.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the summary includes at least one of:

dates, if available, on which the responses were sent, respectively;

qualitative indications of intervals elapsed since the propositions were received, respectively;

quantitative indications of intervals elapsed since the propositions were received, respectively.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein:

the method is implemented as software as a service (SaaS).

22. A system of prosecuting acquisition of formal responses to a formal proposition put forth by a requestor, the system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory operatively coupled to the processor;

wherein the processor is operable to do at least the following,

electronically send the proposition to a group of recipients,

automatically track responses to the proposition,

automatically determine statistics indicative of the tracked responses including a completion ratio, and

electronically present to the requestor at least some of the statistics including the completion ratio.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein:

the statistics include a count of responses received; and

the completion ratio is based upon the count and a total number of sent requests.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the ratio is presented as a percentage.

25. The system of claim 22, wherein electronically presenting by the processor includes:

displaying a chart representing the ratio.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein the chart is a bar graph.

27. The system of claim 22, wherein the processor is further operable to:

configure an electronic representation of the proposition to include,

a written definition of a subject of the proposition, and

a written definition of an affirmation being sought as a desired response to the proposition.

28. The system of claim 27, wherein a configuration of the electronic representation of the proposition further includes:

a solicitation that a response be made in a form of an electronic communication of the affirmation to the requestor.

29. The system of claim 22 wherein the processor is further operable to:

automatically send, to those amongst the recipients for which a response has not been received, respectively, electronic prompts notifying that a response is awaited.

30. The system of claim 29, wherein the processor is further operable to:

establish a schedule for prosecuting the acquisition including,

setting one or more reminder dates

wherein the electronic prompts are sent on the one or more reminder dates.

31. The system of claim 30, wherein:

there are at least first and second reminder dates and at least first and second corresponding prompts, respectively; and

the processor is further operable to,

draft different messages to be communicated by the at least first and second prompts, respectively.

32. The system of claim 31, wherein:

the second prompt is drafted so as to communicate an escalating sense of urgency relative to the first prompt.

33. The system of claim 29, wherein:

the prompts includes at least one of a qualitative and a quantitative indication of an interval elapsed since the proposition was sent.

34. The system of claim 22, wherein:

at least first and second propositions are sent electronically to at least first and second groups of recipients, respectively,

at least first and second sets of responses to the at least first and second propositions are automatically tracked, respectively;

at least first and second sets of statistics are automatically determined for the at least first and second sets of responses, respectively; and

the processor is further operable to,

display a synopsis of progress-statuses regarding at least first and second acquisitions of responses to at least the least first and second propositions, respectively.

35. The system of claim 34, wherein:

there is a recipient who is common to the first and second groups; and

the processor is further operable to,

display a summary regarding progress-statuses for the common recipient including indications of whether the common recipient has responded to the first and second propositions, respectively.

36. The system of claim 35, wherein the summary includes at least one of:

dates, if available, on which the responses were received, respectively;

qualitative indications of intervals elapsed since the propositions were sent, respectively;

quantitative indications of intervals elapsed since the propositions were sent, respectively.

37. The system of claim 34, wherein the statistics includes

a summary of overdue responses;

a summary of recipients for which there is a problem with delivery of the propositions, respectively;

a summary of a subset of higher-priority propositions; and

a summary of a subset of most delinquent recipients.

38. The system of claim 22, wherein the statistics includes

a summary of overdue responses;

a summary of recipients for which there is a problem with delivery of the propositions, respectively; and

a summary of a subset of most delinquent recipients.

39. The system of claim 22, wherein:

the processor is operable in a context of a software as a service (SaaS) architecture.

40. A system of prosecuting generation of formal responses by a recipient to propositions put forth by one or more requestors, the system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory operatively coupled to the processor;

wherein the processor is operable to do at least the following,

electronically send at least first and second propositions to at least first and second groups of recipients,

automatically track at least first and second sets of responses to the at least first and second propositions, and

automatically determine at least first and second statistics indicative of the at least first and second sets of tracked responses;

wherein there is a recipient who is common to the first and second groups; and

wherein the processor is further operable to do at least the following,

electronically present to the common recipient a summary regarding progress-statuses including indications of whether the common recipient has responded to the first and second propositions, respectively.

41. The system of claim 40, wherein the summary includes at least one of:

dates, if available, on which the responses were sent, respectively;

qualitative indications of intervals elapsed since the propositions were received, respectively;

quantitative indications of intervals elapsed since the propositions were received, respectively.

42. The system of claim 41, wherein:

the processor is operable in a context of a software as a service (SaaS) architecture.