BRAND ANALYSIS

• US 20130085803A1
• Filed: 10/03/2011
• Published: 04/04/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 10/03/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: ADTRAK360
• Original Assignee: ADTRAK360
• Inventors: Mauro, Joseph L., Wahl, Zachary H., Tomko, John
• Application Number:
  US13/252,002
• Publication Number:
  US 20130085803A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.29
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 7/02 Comparing digital values G06F7/06, G06F7/22, G06F7/38 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0201 Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data

Abstract

A system provides an analysis of a the strength or weakness of a brand as reflected in both on-line and off-line media. The system automatically retrieves data relating to a particular brand from a plurality of different media channels which may reflect inputs received from the various media channels, perhaps in response to advertisement campaigns. The system generates a score for each media channel which reflects a comparison of the inputs that were received for the brand relative to other similarly situated entities. An aggregate score is generated from the scores that have been generated for the various media channels. Scores and analysis reflecting a relative strength and weakness for a brand are presented.

Claims

1. A method, implemented by a computing system, for analyzing brand awareness, comprising:

receiving a first data set relating to a brand, the first data set associated with a first communication medium;

receiving a second data set relating to the brand, the second data set associated with a second communication medium;

deriving using the first data set a first score relating to the brand and associated with the first communication medium;

deriving using the second data set a second score relating to the brand and associated with the second communication medium; and

deriving an aggregate score relating to the brand using the first score and the second score.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising requesting data relating to the brand from first communication medium and the second communication medium.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving a first data set relating to a brand, the first data set associated with a first communication medium comprises receiving a data set associated with one the following:

a web site;

a social application;

telephone conversations;

email;

broadcast media;

mobile applications; and

landing pages.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving a second data set relating to a brand, the first data set associated with a first communication medium comprises receiving a data set associated with one the following:

a web site;

a social application;

telephone conversations;

email;

broadcast media;

mobile applications; and

landing pages.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising analyzing the first score relative to scores for at least a second brand associated with the first communication medium.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein analyzing the first score relative to scores for at least a second brand associated with the first communication medium comprises comparing the first score to one or more of the following:

scores for similarly sized businesses;

scores for businesses in the same industry;

scores for businesses in a particular geographic area;

scores for a particular industry.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising analyzing the second score relative to scores for at least a second brand associated with the first communication medium.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein analyzing the second score relative to scores for at least a second brand associated with the first communication medium comprises comparing the first score to one or more of the following:

scores for similarly sized businesses;

scores for businesses in the same industry;

scores for businesses in a particular geographic area; and

scores for a particular industry.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising comparing data items in the first data set relating to the brand with data items corresponding to one or more of the following:

competitors;

similarly sized businesses;

a particular industry; and

historical data.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein comparing data items in the first data set relating to the brand comprises comparing data items relating to one or more of the following:

unique visitors;

average page views;

new visitors;

average time on web site;

conversion rates;

click through rates;

impression share;

referrals;

social strength;

social sentiment;

social passion;

social reach;

unique authors;

percentage engaged calls;

percentage unanswered calls after hours;

open rates;

click through;

number of subscribers;

percentage shared;

open rates;

number of subscribers;

response rate;

site visits directed from traditional media.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising comparing data items in the second data set relating to the brand with data items corresponding to one or more of the following:

competitors;

similarly sized businesses;

a particular industry; and

historical data.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein comparing data items in the second data set relating to the brand comprises comparing data items relating to one or more of the following:

unique visitors;

average page views;

new visitors;

average time on web site;

conversion rates;

click through rates;

impression share;

referrals;

social strength;

social sentiment;

social passion;

social reach;

unique authors;

percentage engaged calls;

percentage unanswered calls after hours;

open rates;

click through;

number of subscribers;

percentage shared;

open rates;

number of subscribers;

response rate;

site visits directed from traditional media.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising repeatedly receiving data associated with the first communication medium and presenting updates regarding events associated with the first communication medium.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting updates regarding events associated with the first communication medium comprises presenting updates regarding user inputs received at the first communication medium.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising comparing the first score relative to benchmarks and communicating a notification depending upon the comparison.

16. A computing system adapted for performing brand analysis, comprising:

a computing processor;

computing memory communicatively coupled with the computing processor, the computing memory comprising instructions that when executed by the computing system cause the computing system to perform operations comprising;

receiving data relating to a brand from a plurality of media sources, the plurality of media sources corresponding to both on-line media and off-line media;

analyzing the received data to derive for each of the plurality of media sources a score relating to the brand;

generating an aggregate score for the brand using the derived score for each of the plurality of media sources.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein receiving data relating to a brand from a plurality of media sources comprises receiving data relating to advertisements that have run in both traditional media and on-line media.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein analyzing the received data to derive for each of the plurality of media sources a score relating to the brand comprises processing data received from each of the media sources to be compatible with other received data.

19. The system of claim 16, wherein analyzing the received data to derive for each of the plurality of media sources a score relating to the brand comprises comparing data received for each of the media sources to data for similar brands.