Time Based System for Urgent Email Messages

• US 20130151628A1
• Filed: 12/07/2011
• Published: 06/13/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 12/07/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: DeCusatis, Casimer M., Krishnamurthy, Rajaram B., Neugebauer, Brian, Onghena, Michael, Rao, Anuradha, Catalano, Pasquale A.
• Application Number:
  US13/313,446
• Publication Number:
  US 20130151628A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/224 providing notification on incoming messages, e.g. pushed notifications of received messages

Abstract

An email client receives an urgent tagged email sent by said sender. An urgent timestamp is obtained based on a stored timestamp of a previous urgent tagged email by said sender. Based on the urgent timestamp, it is determined whether said urgent tagged email is allowed. The allowed determining comprises determining whether the urgent tagged email was received within a defined time interval and determining whether the previous timestamp is an allowed value. If the urgent tagged email is allowed, the urgent tagged email is displayed in the email client with an urgent response; a user evaluates whether the urgent tagged email was worth being tagged as urgent; if the urgent tagged email is not worth being tagged urgent, the stored timestamp is updated to the urgent tagged email date; and if the urgent tagged email is worth being tagged urgent, the stored timestamp is updated to the allowed value.

Claims

1. A method for receiving an urgent email message by a sender, the method comprising:

receiving, by an email client on a computer, an urgent tagged email sent by said sender;

obtaining an urgent timestamp based on a stored timestamp of a previous urgent tagged email by said sender;

based on said urgent timestamp, determining whether said urgent tagged email is allowed, said allowed determining comprising determining whether said urgent tagged email was received within a defined time interval and determining whether said previous timestamp is an allowed value; and

responsive to said urgent tagged email being allowed, performing a, b, c, and d;

a) displaying said urgent tagged email in said email client with an urgent response;

b) evaluating, by a user, whether said urgent tagged email was worth being tagged as urgent;

c) responsive to said evaluating that said urgent tagged email was not worth being tagged as urgent, updating said stored timestamp to a date of said urgent tagged email; and

d) responsive to said evaluating that said urgent tagged email was worth being tagged as urgent, updating said stored timestamp to said allowed value.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein obtaining an urgent timestamp further comprises determining whether said sender sent a previous extraordinary tagged email to said email client.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein responsive to said determination that said sender did not send a previous extraordinary tagged email, said obtained timestamp is defined to be said allowed value.

4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising responsive to said urgent tagged email being allowed and responsive to said evaluating that said urgent tagged email was not worth being tagged as urgent, notifying said sender that said user has evaluated said urgent tagged email as not worth being tagged as urgent.

5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising responsive to said urgent tagged email not being allowed, displaying said urgent tagged email as a regular untagged email in said email client.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein said urgent response comprises forced opening of said urgent tagged email by said email client, bypassing of spam filtering by said email client, disabling an ability to delete said urgent tagged email until said urgent tagged email is read, full screen takeover of said computer until content of said urgent tagged email is read by user, full screen takeover of the email client until content of the urgent tagged email is read by the user, or a combination thereof.

7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:

verifying said sender against a whitelist, said whitelist created by said user to designate one or more specific senders who are permitted to send urgent tagged emails to said email client;

wherein obtaining said urgent timestamp is performed in response to said verifying that said sender is in said whitelist;

responsive to said verifying that said sender is not in said whitelist, displaying said urgent tagged email as a regular untagged email in said email client; and

wherein said determining whether said urgent tagged email is allowed is based on said verifying that said sender is in said whitelist.

8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:

writing, by said sender on sender'"'"'s email client on sender'"'"'s computer, said urgent tagged email;

selecting, by said sender on sender'"'"'s email client, an urgent tag for said urgent tagged email; and

sending, by said sender, said urgent tagged email.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein said email client supports receiving signed messages

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein said predetermined time value is selected by the user.

13. The system according to claim 2, wherein responsive to said determination that said sender did not send a previous extraordinary tagged email, said obtained timestamp is defined to be said allowed value.

11. A system for receiving an urgent email message by a sender comprising:

a memory;

a processor in communications with said memory, said processor capable of performing a method comprising;

receiving, by an email client on said system, an urgent tagged email sent by said sender;

obtaining an urgent timestamp based on a stored timestamp of a previous urgent tagged email by said sender;

based on said urgent timestamp, determining whether said urgent tagged email is allowed, said allowed determining comprising determining whether said urgent tagged email was received within a defined time interval and determining whether said previous timestamp is an allowed value; and

responsive to said urgent tagged email being allowed, performing a, b, c, and d;

a) displaying said urgent tagged email in said email client with an urgent response;

b) evaluating, by a user, whether said urgent tagged email was worth being tagged as urgent;

c) responsive to said evaluating that said urgent tagged email was not worth being tagged as urgent, updating said stored timestamp to a date of said urgent tagged email; and

d) responsive to said evaluating that said urgent tagged email was worth being tagged as urgent, updating said stored timestamp to said allowed value.

12. The system according to claim 11, wherein obtaining an urgent timestamp further comprises determining whether said sender sent a previous extraordinary tagged email to said email client.

14. The system according to claim 11, further comprising responsive to said urgent tagged email being allowed and responsive to said evaluating that said urgent tagged email was not worth being tagged as urgent, notifying said sender that said user has evaluated said urgent tagged email as not worth being tagged as urgent.

15. The system according to claim 11, further comprising responsive to said urgent tagged email not being allowed, displaying said urgent tagged email as a regular untagged email in said email client.

16. The system according to claim 11, wherein said urgent response comprises forced opening of said urgent tagged email by said email client, bypassing of spam filtering by said email client, disabling an ability to delete said urgent tagged email until said urgent tagged email is read, full screen takeover of said computer until content of said urgent tagged email is read by user, full screen takeover of the email client until content of the urgent tagged email is read by the user, or a combination thereof.

17. The system according to claim 11, further comprising:

verifying said sender against a whitelist, said whitelist created by said user to designate one or more specific senders who are permitted to send urgent tagged emails to said email client;

wherein obtaining said urgent timestamp is performed in response to said verifying that said sender is in said whitelist;

responsive to said verifying that said sender is not in said whitelist, displaying said urgent tagged email as a regular untagged email in said email client; and

wherein said determining whether said urgent tagged email is allowed is based on said verifying that said sender is in said whitelist.

18. The system according to claim 11, further comprising:

writing, by said sender on sender'"'"'s email client on sender'"'"'s computer, said urgent tagged email;

selecting, by said sender on sender'"'"'s email client, an urgent tag for said urgent tagged email; and

sending, by said sender, said urgent tagged email.

19. The method according to claim 11, wherein said predetermined time value is selected by the user.

20. A computer program product for receiving an urgent email message by a sender, the computer program product comprising:

a storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method comprising;

receiving, by an email client on a computer, an urgent tagged email sent by said sender;

obtaining an urgent timestamp based on a stored timestamp of a previous urgent tagged email by said sender;

based on said urgent timestamp, determining whether said urgent tagged email is allowed, said allowed determining comprising determining whether said urgent tagged email was received within a defined time interval and determining whether said previous timestamp is an allowed value; and

responsive to said urgent tagged email being allowed, performing a, b, c, and d;

a) displaying said urgent tagged email in said email client with an urgent response;

b) evaluating, by a user, whether said urgent tagged email was worth being tagged as urgent;

c) responsive to said evaluating that said urgent tagged email was not worth being tagged as urgent, updating said stored timestamp to a date of said urgent tagged email; and

d) responsive to said evaluating that said urgent tagged email was worth being tagged as urgent, updating said stored timestamp to said allowed value.