EVALUATING TYPEABILITY OF DOMAIN NAMES

• US 20130166571A1
• Filed: 12/23/2011
• Published: 06/27/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 12/23/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: VeriSign, Inc.
• Original Assignee: VeriSign, Inc.
• Inventors: Ibrahimbegovic, Jasenko, Thomas, Matthew
• Granted Patent: US 9,195,316 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/748
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24578 using ranking
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0233 Character input methods
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations

Abstract

Methods and systems are disclosed for assessing an identifier. The method comprises receiving, via an interface, a string of characters making up the identifier and determining a keyboard type for a keyboard. The method further comprises calculating, by a calculator module, a typeability score for the identifier based on the string of characters and the keyboard type, wherein the typeability score signifies a difficulty of typing the identifier on the determined keyboard type. In certain embodiments, the method further comprises determining a finger positioning corresponding to a position of a typer'"'"'s fingers on the keyboard, and the typeability score is further based on the finger positioning. In some embodiments, the finger positioning is based on the typer'"'"'s typing habits.

Claims

1. A method for assessing an identifier, the method comprising:

receiving, via an interface, a string of characters making up the identifier;

determining a keyboard type for a keyboard; and

calculating, by a calculator module, a typeability score for the identifier based on the string of characters and the keyboard type, wherein the typeability score signifies a difficulty of typing the identifier on the determined keyboard type.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein calculating the typeability score for the identifier comprises:

calculating, by the calculator module, a plurality of metrics for typing the string of characters based on the keyboard type; and

calculating the typeabilty score as a weighted sum of the plurality of metrics.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining a finger positioning corresponding to a position of a typer'"'"'s fingers on the keyboard, wherein the typeability score is further based on the finger positioning.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein determining the finger positioning comprises receiving the finger positioning or setting the finger positioning to a default finger positioning that corresponds to the keyboard type.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

calculating typeability scores for a plurality of identifiers; and

sorting the plurality of identifiers based on the typeability scores and presenting the sorted plurality of identifiers to a user.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising assessing, based on the typeability score, whether the identifier is generated by an automated process, wherein the assessing comprises calculating a probability that the identifier is generated by an automated process and wherein the probability is non-decreasing function of the typeability score.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the keyboard type for the keyboard includes receiving the keyboard type or setting the keyboard type to a default keyboard type.

8. A system for assessing an identifier, the system comprising:

an interface for receiving a string of characters for the identifier; and

a calculator module for calculating a typeability score for the identifier based on the string of characters and a keyboard type for a keyboard, wherein the typeability score signifies a difficulty of typing the identifier on the type of keyboard.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the calculator module calculates the typeability score for the identifier by calculating a plurality of metrics for typing the string of characters based on the keyboard type and by further calculating the typeabilty score as a weighted sum of the plurality of metrics.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the calculator module is further for determining a finger positioning corresponding to a positioning of a typer'"'"'s fingers on the keyboard, and wherein the typeability score is further based on the finger positioning.

11. The system of claim 8, wherein the identifier is a domain name.

12. A non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by one or more computer processors, causes the one or more computer processors to execute a method for assessing an identifier, the method comprising:

receiving a string of characters making up the identifier;

determining a keyboard type for a keyboard; and

calculating a typeability score for the identifier based on the string of characters and the keyboard type, wherein the typeability score signifies a difficulty of typing the identifier on the determined keyboard type.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein calculating the typeability score for the identifier comprises:

calculating a plurality of metrics for typing the string of characters based on the keyboard type; and

calculating the typeabilty score as a weighted sum of the plurality of metrics,

wherein the weighted sum assigns a weight to each of the plurality of metrics based on an importance of the corresponding metrics to the ease or difficulty of typing the identifier.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein the method further comprises determining a finger positioning corresponding to a position of a typer'"'"'s fingers on the keyboard, and wherein the typeability score is further based on the finger positioning, wherein the finger positioning is based on the typer'"'"'s typing habits.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 wherein determining the finger positioning comprises receiving the finger positioning or setting the finger positioning to a default finger positioning that corresponds to the keyboard type.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein the identifier is a domain name.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein the method further comprises proposing the identifier to a user based on the calculated typeability score.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein the method further comprises assessing, based on the typeability score, whether the identifier is generated by an automated process.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein the calculated typeability score is a raw typeability score and wherein the method further comprises calculating a normalized typeability score via dividing the raw typeability score by a maximal typeability score or by a number of characters in the string of characters.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein determining the keyboard type for the keyboard includes receiving the keyboard type or setting the keyboard type to a default keyboard type.

21. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein the method further comprises calculating, for the identifier, a plurality of typeability scores corresponding to a plurality of keyboard types and calculating an average typeability score for the identifier by finding a simple average or a weighted average of the plurality of typeability scores.

22. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein each of the plurality of typeability scores corresponds to one keyboard type of the plurality of keyboard types and to one finger positioning of one or more finger positionings that correspond to the one keyboard type.