Container Selection in a Materials Handling Facility

• US 20130218799A1
• Filed: 02/16/2012
• Published: 08/22/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 02/16/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)
• Inventors: Lehmann, Sebastian, Doshi, Hardik B., Sundaresan, Subramanian
• Application Number:
  US13/398,602
• Publication Number:
  US 20130218799A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/337
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/08 Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/083 Shipping

Abstract

Described herein are systems and techniques for recommending custom containers in a materials handling facility dependent on physical characteristics of an item or group of items to be shipped and/or dependent upon estimated shipping costs. For example, the systems described herein may determine dimensions for forming a custom container within the materials handling facility that is capable of containing an item or group of items for shipment. The total cost to ship the item or group of items in the custom container or a standard container can also be determined and the container with the lowest total cost may be recommended for use in packaging the item or group of items for shipment.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of selecting a container for shipping an item, comprising:

under control of one or more computing systems configured with executable instructions,

identifying a materials handling facility with inventory that includes the item;

identifying a standard container available at the materials handling facility for shipping the item, the standard container identified at least in part based upon physical characteristics associated with the item;

determining custom container dimension values for forming at the materials handling facility a custom container for shipping the item, the custom container dimension values dependent at least in part upon the physical characteristics associated with the item;

determining a standard container total fulfillment cost for shipping the item using the identified standard container;

determining a custom container total fulfillment cost for shipping the item using a container having the custom container dimension values;

if the standard container total fulfillment cost is more than the custom container total fulfillment cost;

forming a custom container having a size large enough to contain the item;

selecting the formed custom container for shipping the item; and

if the standard container total fulfillment cost is less than or equal to the custom container total fulfillment cost, selecting the standard container for shipping the item.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the custom container total fulfillment cost includes a load balancing factor to balance load between:

at least one custom container packing station, each of the at least one custom container packing stations having one or more custom container forming devices; and

at least one standard container packing station.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein an amount of the load balancing factor is variable.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the custom container total fulfillment cost includes an estimated transportation cost for transporting the item using a container having the custom container dimension values.

5. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions for enabling selection of a container for shipping an item package, the instructions when executed by a processor causing the processor to:

obtain an estimated standard container total fulfillment cost to ship the item package in a standard container;

obtain an estimated custom container total fulfillment cost to ship the item package in a custom container;

select the custom container for shipping the item package if the estimated custom container total fulfillment cost is less than the estimated standard container total fulfillment cost; and

select the standard container for shipping the item package if the estimated standard container total fulfillment cost is less than the estimated custom container total fulfillment cost.

6. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 5, the instructions when executed by a processor further causing the processor to:

identify a materials handling facility capable of shipping the item package;

wherein the estimated standard container total fulfillment cost is based at least in part upon an estimated transportation cost to transport the item package from the identified materials handling facility in the standard container; and

wherein estimated custom container total fulfillment cost is based at least in part upon an estimated transportation cost to transport the item package from the identified materials handling facility in the custom container.

7. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 5, wherein the estimated custom container total fulfillment cost is based at least in part upon a load balancing factor for balancing load across a plurality of packing stations.

8. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the load balancing factor varies based at least in part upon a number of item packages recommended for packaging in a custom container.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the load balancing factor varies based at least in part upon a historical load.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the load balancing factor varies based at least in part upon an anticipated load.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 5, wherein the item package includes a plurality of items.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 5, wherein the estimated custom container total fulfillment cost is based at least in part upon a volume of the custom container.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 12, wherein the volume of the custom container is determined based at least in part on physical characteristics associated with the item package.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 12, wherein the volume of the custom container is determined based at least in part on physical characteristics associated with one or more items included in the item package.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 12, wherein the volume of the custom container is determined based at least in part on physical characteristics associated with the item package and a non-item content.

16. A computing system, comprising:

one or more processors; and

a memory coupled to the one or more processors and storing program instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to;

receive a request to ship a first item and a second item;

determine at least a first item package and a second item package, each of the first item package and the second item package containing a different combination of the first item and the second item;

identify a first materials handling facility and a second materials handling facility, each of the first materials handling facility and the second materials handling facility capable of shipping at least one of the first item package and the second item package;

for each of the first item package and the second item package,

obtain a container recommendation set for shipping the item package;

if the item package can be shipped from the first materials handling facility,

obtain a standard container transportation cost to ship the item package from the first materials handling facility in a standard container;

obtain a custom container transportation cost to ship the item package from the first materials handling facility in a custom container;

if the item package can be shipped from the second materials handling facility,

obtain an estimated standard container transportation cost to ship the item package from the second materials handling facility;

obtain an estimated custom container transportation cost to ship the item package from the second materials handling facility; and

determine an estimated lowest total fulfillment cost combination to ship the first item and the second item based at least in part on the obtained estimated standard container transportation costs and obtained estimated custom container transportation costs.

17. The computing system of claim 16, wherein the estimated lowest total fulfillment cost combination includes selecting a custom container formed in the first materials handling facility based at least in part on recommend custom container dimension values for use in forming a custom container to ship the first item package from the first materials handling facility.

18. The computing system of claim 17, wherein the first item package includes the first item.

19. The computing system of claim 17, wherein the first item package includes the first item and the second item.

20. The computing system of claim 17, wherein the estimated lowest total fulfillment cost combination includes selecting a standard container to ship the second item package from a second materials handling facility.

21. The computing system of claim 16, wherein the estimated lowest total fulfillment cost combination is further based at least in part upon a load balancing factor added to each of the estimated custom container transportation costs.

22. The computing system of claim 21, wherein the load balancing factor varies over time based at least in part on a current load of at least one of the first materials handling facility and the second materials handling facility.

23. The computing system of claim 16, wherein the estimated lowest total fulfillment cost combination is further based upon:

standard container additional costs added to each obtained estimated standard container transportation cost; and

custom container additional costs added to each obtained estimated custom container transportation cost.

24. The computing system of claim 23, wherein the standard container additional costs include one or more of:

a cost of corrugate, a labor cost, an overhead cost, a materials handling cost, and an agent cost.

25. The computing system of claim 23, wherein the custom container additional costs include one or more of:

a cost of corrugate, a labor cost, an overhead cost, a handling cost, an agent cost, and a custom container forming device use cost.

26. The computing system of claim 16, wherein the container recommendation set includes:

a recommendation for a standard container for shipping the item package;

recommended custom container dimension values for use in forming a custom container for use in shipping the item package.