DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR POPPET VALVES AND MEASURING DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT SAID METHOD

• US 20130228005A1
• Filed: 09/06/2011
• Published: 09/05/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 09/09/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Gea Tuchenhagen Gmbh (GEA Group AG)
• Original Assignee: Gea Tuchenhagen Gmbh (GEA Group AG)
• Inventors: Suedel, Matthias, Porath, Bernd, Fahrenbach, Peter
• Granted Patent: US 9,488,626 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 73/37
• CPC Class Codes: F16K 1/446 with additional cleaning or venting means between the two seats
• CPC Class Codes: F16K 37/0083 by measuring valve parameters
• CPC Class Codes: G01B 5/30 for measuring the deformation in a solid, e.g. mechanical strain gauge
• CPC Class Codes: G01B 7/18 using change in resistance
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 33/00 Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00

Abstract

The invention relates to diagnostic methods according to the preamble of the equivalent claims 1 and 2, with which the state of a poppet valve in the course of the switching cycles and/or events thereof, such as the occurrence of pressure shocks or surges during continuous operation is/are monitored continuously, the measured signals are stored and the stored measured signals are interpreted in a targeted manner and early indication of cases of damage is carried out. According to a preferred variant of the diagnostic method, said aim is achieved in that at the same time as the force-time curve of the actuating force or the reaction force (F1(t); F2(t)), a displacement-time curve (h(t)) of the displacement (h) of the at least one closing element (8*) is measured, in that the force-time curve of the actuating force or of the reaction force (F1(t); F2(t)) and the displacement-time curve (h(t)) are combined with each other and used to determine a force-displacement curve of the actuating force or the reaction force (F1(h); F2(h)), in that the current force-displacement curve of the actuating force (F1(h)) or the reaction force (F2(h)) of a switching cycle, in each case determined over the operating period or lifetime of the poppet valve (100), is compared with an earlier, stored curve, in that deviations are determined from the comparison, in that, within a predefined tolerance range for said deviations, the latter are accepted, and in that, when said deviations exceed the predefined tolerance range, a message and/or a control signal is/are generated.

Claims

1. A diagnostic method for poppet valves with which an actuating force (F1) representing an action force that is generated by a drive (2) of the poppet valve (100) is determined for at least one closing element (8*) of the poppet valve (100) in the form of a force-time curve, the actuating force (F1) is either determined directly or from a reaction force (F2) resulting from the actuating force (F1) in the poppet valve (100), wherein the actuating force (F1) or the reaction force (F2) is determined by measuring the expanding deformations caused therefrom, and the measured, current force-time curve of the actuating force (F1(t)) or of the reaction force (F2(t)) is saved and subjected to an evaluation,

characterized in that

the current force-time curve measured during the operation or life of the poppet valve (100) of the actuating force or of the reaction force (F1(t);

F2(t)) of a switching cycle is compared with a saved, earlier one,

deviations are determined from the comparison,

deviations within a predetermined tolerance range for these deviations are accepted,

and that when these deviations exceed the predetermined tolerance range, a message and/or control signal is/are generated.

6. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of the prior claims,

characterized in that

a switching cycle in a sequence over time consists of at least one closed position (SS), an opening movement, an open (OS) or partially open position, and/or at least one open (OS) or partially open position, a closing movement and a closed position (SS).

7. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of the prior claims,

characterized in that

an acceptable switching cycle measured at the start of the operation or life of the poppet valve (100) is always used for the comparison.

8. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one claims 1 to 6,

characterized in that

the measured current switching cycle is compared with the last measured and accepted one.

9. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one claims 1 to 6,

characterized in that

the measured current switching cycle is compared with the average of a predetermined number of last measured and accepted switching cycles.

10. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of the prior claims with the exception of claims 2 to 5,

characterized in that

the forces and associated times of the measured force-time curves for the actuating force or the reaction force (F1(t);

F2(t)) are standardized to ensure comparable switching cycles.

11. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of the prior claims,

characterized in that

at least one comparative criterion from those cited below is used for comparing the force-time curves of the actuating force or of the reaction force (F1(t);

F2(t)), or the force-displacement curves of the actuating force or of the reaction force (F1(h);

F2(h));

the slope

the curvature

the amount

at predetermined, discrete comparative locations,

the change in the amount

the surface integral

at predetermined discrete time or displacement intervals (Δ

t;

Δ

h).

12. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of the prior claims,

characterized in that

the force-time curve of the actuating force or reaction force (F1(t), F2(t)), and/or the force-displacement curve of the actuating force or of the reaction force (F1(h, F2(h)) at the beginning of the operation or life of the poppet valve (100;

110, 120, 130, 140) is used to identify the design of the poppet valve (100), and the poppet valve (100) typified in this manner is then subject to a preliminary adjustment with setting and/or monitoring data.

13. A measuring device for performing the diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of the prior claims,

wherein the measuring device (3) is arranged on a poppet valve (100) having at least one closing element (8*) in a valve housing (1), wherein the valve housing (1) is securely connected to a drive (2) via a lantern housing (4), wherein the drive (2) is designed as a spring-piston drive supplied with pressurization medium, and wherein at least one adjusting rod (8a*) actuatable by the drive (2) is provided for least one closing element (8*),

characterized in that

the measuring device (3) consists of at least one first measuring device (3.1) formed by at least one expansion sensor (DS), is arranged on the lantern housing (4), and is connected to an evaluation unit (2b).

14. The measuring device according to claim 13,

characterized in that

the lantern housing (4) has a first lantern crossmember (4a) and a second lantern crossmember (4b) opposite it, that the first measuring device (3.1) is arranged on the first lantern crossmember (4a), and that a second measuring device (3.2) is provided that is formed by at least one additional expansion sensor (DS), is arranged on the second lantern crossmember (4b), and is connected to the evaluation unit (2b).

15. The measuring device according to claim 13 or 14,

characterized in that

a displacement measuring device (3.3) is arranged on or in a housing jacket (2.1) of the drive (2) and which is formed by at least one additional expansion sensor (DS) and is connected to the evaluation unit (2b), a drive expansion force (FA) exists in the housing jacket (2.1) that is generated as a reaction force from a pretension (FV) of a spring (2.5) that resets the drive piston (2.4) of the drive (2), and the displacement measuring device (3.3) is arranged on the housing jacket (2.1) and is designed to measure the drive expansion force (FA).

16. The measuring device according to one of the claims 13 to 15,

characterized in that

a first and second expansion sensor (DS1, DS2) are arranged in the first measuring device (3.1), a third and fourth expansion sensor (DS3, DS4) are arranged in the second measuring device (3.2), a fifth and sixth expansion sensor (DS5, DS6) are arranged in the displacement measuring device (3.3), and one expansion sensor of each pair of expansion sensors (DS1, DS2;

DS3, DS4;

DS5, DS6) is arranged in the direction of displacement, and the other is arranged in an orthogonal direction thereto.

17. The use of the diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of claims 1 to 12, and of the measuring device for performing the method according to one of claims 13 to 16 for a shutoff valve (110) with a single closing element (8*).

18. The use of the diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of claims 1 to 12 and of the measuring device for performing the method according to one of claims 13 to 16 for a double seat valve (120) having two closing elements (6, 8) that are independently actuatable by means of the drive (2) and that enclose a leakage cavity (7) between themselves which is connected via at least one connecting path to the surrounding area of the double seat valve (120).

19. The use of the diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of claims 1 to 12 and of the measuring device for performing the method according to one of claims 13 to 16 for a seat-cleaning double seat valve (130) having two closing elements (6, 8) that are independently actuatable by means of the drive (2) and that enclose a leakage cavity (7) between themselves which is connected via at least one connecting path to the surrounding area of the double seat valve (120), wherein the closing elements (6, 8) each have partially open positions that can be controlled separate from each other.

20. The use of the diagnostic method for poppet valves according to one of claims 1 to 12 and of the measuring device for performing the method according to one of claims 13 to 16 for a double seat valve (140) having a single closing element (8*) with two seat seals (16.1*, 16.2*) at an axial distance from each other, that enclose a leakage cavity between themselves and in conjunction with assigned seat surfaces and the closing element (8*) that is connected via at least one connecting path to the surrounding area of the double seal valve (140).

2. A diagnostic method for poppet valves with which an actuating force (F1) representing an action force that is generated by a drive (2) of the poppet valve (100) is measured for at least one closing element (8*) of the poppet valve (100) in the form of a force-time curve, the actuating force (F1) is either measured directly or from the reaction force (F2) resulting from the actuating force (F1) in the poppet valve (100), wherein the actuating force (F1) or the reaction force (F2) is determined by measuring the expanding deformations caused therefrom, and the measured, current force-time curve of the actuating force (F1(t)) or of the reaction force (F2(t)) is saved and subjected to an evaluation,

characterized in that

a displacement-time curve (h(t)) of the displacement (h) of the at least one closing element (8*) is measured at the same time as the force-time curve of the actuating force or of the reaction force (F1(t);

F2(t)), and the force-time curve of the actuating force and reaction force (F1(t);

F2(t)) and the displacement-time curve (h(t)) are combined with each other, and a force-displacement curve of the actuating force or of the reaction force (F1(h);

F2(h)) is calculated therefrom,

the current force-time curve determined during the operation or life of the poppet valve (100) of the actuating force (F1(t)) or of the reaction force (F2(t)) of a switching cycle is compared with a saved, earlier one,

deviations are determined from the comparison,

deviations within a predetermined tolerance range for these deviations are accepted,

and that when these deviations exceed the predetermined tolerance range, a message and/or a control signal is/are generated.

3. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to claim 2,

characterized in that

the displacement (h) is determined by direct displacement measurement.

4. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to claim 2,

characterized in that

the displacement (h) is determined by an indirectly representative physical quantity within the poppet valve (100).

5. The diagnostic method for poppet valves according to claim 4,

characterized in that

an expansion caused by the generation of the displacement (h) in the drive (2) is used as a physical quantity.