SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISPATCHING VIDEO RECORDING

• US 20130235209A1
• Filed: 06/29/2012
• Published: 09/12/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 03/09/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Industrial Technology Research Institute
• Original Assignee: Industrial Technology Research Institute
• Inventors: Lee, Ho-Hsin, Chen, Jian-Ren, Cheng, Chieh-Chen, Hsieh, Yueh-Hsun
• Application Number:
  US13/537,056
• Publication Number:
  US 20130235209A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 348/159
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/2187 Live feed
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/23103 using load balancing strategies, e.g. by placing or distributing content on different disks, different memories or different servers storage management G06F3/0604; allocation of resources considering the load in multiprogramming arrangements G06F9/505; techniques for rebalancing the load in a distributed system G06F9/5083; access to distributed or replicated servers, e.g. load balancing, in data networks H04L67/1001
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/24 Monitoring of processes or resources, e.g. monitoring of server load, available bandwidth, upstream requests monitoring of server performance or load G06F11/34; arrangements for observation, testing or troubleshooting for broadcast or for distribution combined with broadcast H04H20/12
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/4425 Monitoring of client processing errors or hardware failure
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 5/765 Interface circuits between an apparatus for recording and another apparatus
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 5/781 on disks or drums
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 9/8211 the additional signal being a sound signal H04N9/835 takes precedence

Abstract

A system and a method for dispatching of video recording are provided. In the method, one or more video recording servers having an available CPU utilization larger than an average CPU loading per task is found from one or more video recording servers having a task capability greater than zero. One of the found one or more video recording servers is selected to execute a video recording task whose execution status is indicated as unexecuted in a video recording task status table.

Claims

1. A method of dispatching video recording, comprising:

determining one or more video recording servers with an available CPU utilization larger than an average CPU loading from one or more video recording servers having a task capability greater than zero; and

selecting one of the determined one or more video recording servers to execute a video recording task with an execution status labelled as an unexecuted status in a video recording task status table.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

periodically re-obtaining another video recording task with the execution status labelled as the unexecuted status from the video recording task status table and assigning the another video recording task to a selected video recording server.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a video recording service request;

adding at least one video recording task corresponding to the video recording service request to the video recording task status table; and

labeling the execution status of the at least one video recording task to be the unexecuted status.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a status message periodically reported from each of the one or more video recording servers;

determining whether the one or more video recording servers are normally operated according to the corresponding status message; and

when the one or more video recording servers are determined to be not normally operated, changing the execution status of the video recording task executed by the one or more video recording servers to the unexecuted status.

5. The method of claim 4, when the one or more video recording servers are determined to be not normally operated, further comprising:

changing the task capability of the one or more video recording servers to zero.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

driving the selected video recording server to connect to at least one camera corresponding to the video recording task so that the selected video recording server receives and records at least one image captured by the at least one camera.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

the video recording server determining whether a connection between the video recording server and at least one camera is abnormal; and

if the connection is determined to be abnormal, the one or more video recording servers reporting an abnormal connection message to a dispatching server and repeatedly executing an connection action until the connection is successfully established or until the dispatching server stops the video recording task.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

obtaining a modulation required video recording server with the available CPU utilization larger than a task modulation threshold value;

finding one or more video recording servers with the available CPU utilization larger than the average CPU loading among other video recording servers;

finding a replacement video recording server with a total CPU utilization larger than the modulation required video recording server from therein the found one or more video recording servers; and

transferring the video recording task to the replacement video recording server.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining whether an idle time of each of the one or more video recording servers is larger than an idle time threshold value; and

when the idle time is larger than the idle time threshold value, forcing the one or more video recording servers to enter an suspension status.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

if there is no video recording server with the task capability greater than zero, awaking a suspended video recording server; and

assigning the video recording task to the awoke suspended video recording server.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the task capability is the product of the available CPU utilization, a network capability, a hardware acceleration capability and a cost consideration of each of the one or more video recording servers.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the task capability is obtained by subtracting a product of an average recording frame per second of the video recording server handling a single video recording task and a current task count handled by the video recording server from a total video recording frame per second which can be video recorded by the video recording server.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the task capability of the one or more video recording servers is marked in a video recording server status table.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the available CPU utilization is obtained by deducting a product of the average CPU loading for handling a single video recording task and a current task count handled by the video recording server from a total CPU utilization of a processor of the video recording servers.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein a video recording server with a maximum total CPU utilization is selected from the one or more video recording servers to execute the video recording task.

16. The method of claim 8, wherein the total CPU utilization of the replacement video recording server is the maximum.

17. The method of claim 10, wherein a total CPU utilization of the awoke video recording server is the maximum.

18. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

changing the execution status of the video recording task in the video recording task status table to be a currently executed status.

19. A system for dispatching video recording, comprising:

a dispatching server, including;

a task dispatching module, determining one or more video recording servers with an available CPU utilization larger than an average CPU loading from therein one or more video recording servers having a task capability greater than zero, selecting one of the determined one or more video recording servers and assigning a video recording task to the selected video recording server with an execution status labelled as an unexecuted status in a video recording task status table.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the task dispatching module further periodically re-obtains another video recording task with the execution status labelled as the unexecuted status from the video recording task status table and assigns the another video recording task to a selected video recording server.

21. The system of claim 19, wherein the task dispatching module further receives a video recording service request, adds at least one video recording task corresponding to the video recording service request to the video recording task status table and labels the execution status of the at least one video recording task to be the unexecuted status.

22. The system of claim 19, wherein the dispatching server further comprises:

a status message module, receiving a status message periodically reported from each of the one or more video recording servers, determining whether the one or more video recording servers are normally operated according to the corresponding status message and changing the execution status of the video recording task executed by the one or more video recording servers to be the unexecuted status when the one or more video recording servers are determined to be not normally operated, so as to re-assign the video recording task to other video recording server by the task dispatching module.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein when the status message module determines one or more video recording servers are not normally operated, the status message module further changes the task capability of the one or more video recording servers to be zero in a video recording server status table.

24. The system of claim 22, wherein each of the one or more video recording servers comprises:

a video recording module; and

a task controller, starting the video recording module to be connected to at least one camera corresponding to the video recording task and receiving and recording at least one image captured by the at least one camera.

25. The system of claim 24, wherein the task controller further determines whether a connection to the at least one camera is abnormal, and reports an abnormal connection message to the status message module if the connection is determined to be abnormal, so as to start the video recording module to repeatedly executes an connection action until the connection is successfully established or until the dispatching server issues a stop command to stop the video recording task.

26. The system of claim 19, wherein the dispatching server further comprising:

a resource modulation module, determining whether the available CPU utilization of each of the one or more video recording servers is larger than a task modulation threshold value, and when the available CPU utilization of each of the one or more video recording servers is determined to be larger than the task modulation threshold value, then finding at least one video recording server with the available CPU utilization larger than the average CPU loading among other video recording servers of the one or more video recording servers, and finding a replacement video recording server with a total CPU utilization larger than the modulation required video recording server from therein the found at least one video recording server so as to transfer the video recording task to the replacement video recording server.

27. The system of claim 19, wherein the task dispatching module further determines whether an idle time of each of the one or more video recording servers is larger than an idle time threshold value and, when the idle time is larger than the idle time threshold value, forces the one or more video recording servers to enter a suspension status.

28. The system of claim 19, wherein the task dispatching module further awakes a suspended video recording server when there is no video recording server with the task capability greater than zero and assigns the video recording task to the awoke suspended video recording server.

29. The system of claim 19, wherein the task capability is the product of the available CPU utilization, a network capability, a hardware acceleration capability and a cost consideration of each of the video recording servers.

30. The system of claim 19, wherein the task capability is obtained by subtracting a product of an average recording frame per second of the video recording server handling a single video recording task and a current task count handled by the video recording server from a total video recording frame per second which can be video recorded by the video recording server.

31. The system of claim 19, wherein the available CPU utilization is obtained by deducting a product of the average CPU loading for handling a single video recording task and the current task count handled by the video recording server from a total CPU utilization of a processor of the video recording servers.

32. The system of claim 19, wherein the task dispatching module selects a video recording server with a maximum total CPU utilization from the one or more video recording servers to execute the video recording task.

33. The system of claim 26, wherein the total CPU utilization of the replacement video recording server is the maximum.

34. The system of claim 28, wherein the task dispatching module awakes a video recording server with the maximum total CPU utilization.

35. The system of claim 19, further comprising:

changing the execution status of the video recording task in the video recording task status table to be a currently executed status.

36. The system of claim 19, further comprising:

a storage unit, storing the video recording task status table and a video recording server status table for recording the task capability.