METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PURCHASE PLANNING

• US 20130246237A1
• Filed: 02/12/2013
• Published: 09/19/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 03/15/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Aptitude LLC
• Original Assignee: Aptitude LLC
• Inventors: Dyess, Diane Agerton, Denton, Joel Walter, Fleming, Shawn Michael, Hibbs, Justin Jerry, Kirchenbauer, Troy Wayne, Lewis, Russell Francis, Mallinckrodt, John Walter II, Willey, Scott Michael, Musial, Krzysztof
• Application Number:
  US13/765,507
• Publication Number:
  US 20130246237A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/35
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/048 Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06315 Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/08 Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0206 Price or cost determination based on market factors
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0605 Supply or demand aggregation
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0609 Buyer or seller confidence or verification
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0611 Request for offers or quotes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0613 Third-party assisted
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0623 Item investigation
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0631 Item recommendations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0633 Lists, e.g. purchase orders, compilation or processing
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/28 Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading, distribution or shipping

Abstract

Some examples provide systems, methods, apparatus, and computer program products for providing a market platform. The market platform may operate to inform buyers and suppliers, to allow buyers and suppliers to select products and contracting parameters to meet their needs, to allow buyers and suppliers to commit to supply agreements, and to enforce those supply agreements. These examples may provide such an integrated system by receiving buyer spend data, receiving contract offers from one or more suppliers based on the spend data, allowing the buyer to select one or more of the contract offers, and monitoring spend data to ensure compliance with the selected contract offer. The system may include dynamic pricing models, altering the price of the purchased products based on compliance with the selected contract offer. The system may also allow for various contracting models for managing the pricing of products based on the contractual terms agreed to by the buyer and supplier.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving one or more pricing proposals for at least one proposed product;

generating a spending plan based on the one or more pricing proposals, the spending plan comprising a set of product selections and a product spending allocation for each of the product selections, wherein the set of product selections comprises a list of products available for purchase according to at least one of the one or more pricing proposals;

presenting the spending plan via an interface;

receiving, via the interface, an alteration to at least one of one of the product selections or one of the product spending allocations;

determining, using a processor, the financial impact of the alteration on the spending plan; and

updating the spending plan to reflect the financial impact.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the spending plan is based on a buyer spend history.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of product selections comprises at least one cross-reference for a product previously purchased by a first buyer.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the product cross-reference is at least one of a cross-reference proposed by a product supplier or a cross-reference derived from a selection of a second buyer during generation of another spending plan.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the alteration is associated with a particular pricing proposal, and wherein the method further comprises:

updating at least one allocation for at least one of the remaining pricing proposals in response to the alteration to the particular pricing proposal.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the spending plan is generated based on at least one optimization criterion, and wherein the optimization criterion is at least one of a minimum cost across all suppliers, a maximum discount for a particular supplier, a minimum conversion from a current set of suppliers, maintenance of a relationship with at least one current supplier, or a maximum spending coverage among a fewest number of suppliers.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more pricing proposals are received in response to a request for pricing, wherein the request for pricing comprises at least one currently purchased product, and wherein the set of product selections is derived from the at least one currently purchased product.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

monitoring buyer spending data; and

tracking the buyer spending data against the spending plan.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating one or more committed pricing agreements with at least one supplier of the set of product selections.

17. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to generate one or more committed pricing agreements with at least one supplier of the set of product selections.

10. The method of claim 10, wherein the one or more committed pricing agreements comprise terms generated using the set of product selections, the product spending 1, allocations, and one or more discount values specified in one of the one or more pricing proposals corresponding to the set of product selections.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the terms comprise a market share commitment derived from the set of product selections and the product spending allocations.

12. An apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one computer readable medium, the computer readable medium comprising instructions, that when executed by the processor, configure the processor to:

receive one or more pricing proposals for at least one proposed product;

generate a spending plan based on the one or more pricing proposals, the spending plan comprising a set of product selections and a product spending allocation for each of the product selections, wherein the set of product selections comprises a list of products available for purchase according to at least one of the one or more pricing proposals;

present the spending plan via an interface;

receive, via the interface, an alteration to at least one of one of the product selections or one of the product spending allocations;

determine, the financial impact of the alteration on the spending plan; and

update the spending plan to reflect the financial impact.

13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the spending plan is based on a buyer spend history.

14. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the set of product selections comprises at least one cross-reference for a product previously purchased by a first buyer.

15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the product cross-reference is at least one of a cross-reference proposed by a product supplier or a cross-reference derived from a selection of a second buyer during generation of another spending plan.

16. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the alteration is associated with a particular pricing proposal, and wherein the processor is further configured to:

update at least one allocation for at least one of the remaining pricing proposals to reflect the alteration to the particular pricing proposal.

18. A computer readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, configure the processor to:

receive one or more pricing proposals for at least one proposed product;

generate a spending plan based on the one or more pricing proposals, the spending plan comprising a set of product selections and a product spending allocation for each of the product selections wherein the set of product selections comprises a list of products available for purchase according to at least one of the one or more pricing proposals;

present the spending plan via an interface;

receive, via the interface, an alteration to at least one of one of the product selections or one of the product spending allocations;

determine the financial impact of the alteration on the spending plan; and

update the spending plan to reflect the financial impact.

19. The computer readable storage medium of claim 18, wherein the spending plan is based on a buyer spend history.

20. The computer readable storage medium of claim 18, wherein the set of product selections comprises at least one cross-reference for a product previously purchased by a first buyer.