PROACTIVE EVIDENCE DISSEMINATION

• US 20130254133A1
• Filed: 03/21/2013
• Published: 09/26/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 03/21/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Riskjockey Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Riskjockey Incorporated
• Inventors: Connell, Michael A., Bone, Andrew J.
• Application Number:
  US13/848,584
• Publication Number:
  US 20130254133A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/342
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/18 Legal services

Abstract

A secure evidence sharing engine may facilitate and/or aid in the sharing of evidence documentation between providers and recipients of such information. In some examples, the engine may receive, from a client device, some identification information associated with a user. Additionally, the user, requesting or purchasing evidence can identify further parties to notify. At a later date, evidentiary documentation may be received regarding an item associated with the user. The secure evidence sharing engine may notify the user and identified parties that the evidentiary documentation is available for access. The interested parties may then access the evidentiary documentation after agreeing to terms and conditions and possibly paying a fee. Upon receipt of new evidence after an initial notification, the user and identified parties may receive notification of the new evidence and may choose to access the new evidence in a similar manner.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for secure evidence sharing, comprising:

receiving identification information associated with a party;

receiving evidentiary documentation associated with an incident involving law enforcement and the party;

identifying, with a party identification component of a computer system, at least one interested party to notify based at least in part on the received identification information or information associated with the received evidentiary documentation; and

notifying the identified interested party with respect to the received evidentiary documentation.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

subsequent to notifying the identified interested party with respect to the received evidentiary documentation, receiving further evidentiary documentation associated with the incident; and

notifying the at least one interested party with respect to the further evidentiary documentation.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the identification information associated with the party includes at least one of:

an insurance policy number, a vehicle identification number, a name, an email address, and a real property address.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the party associated with the identification information has declared a legal interest in the object or outcome of the incident involving law enforcement.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the received identification information is associated with involved in the incident, or a separate party the interested party has identified.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising;

receiving from a user a request to access the evidentiary documentation;

in response to receiving the request, determining that the user has a legal right to view the evidentiary documentation; and

based on the determination, enabling the user to access the received electronic evidentiary documentation.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the electronic evidentiary documentation includes an electronic copy of at least one police report, in-car video, officer worn video, eyewitness account, or any document created with the expectation that the document may be used as evidence at trial, or a combination thereof.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving user identification information from a user;

receiving interested party identification information from a provider of interested party identification information;

comparing received user identification information to the received interested party identification information and the received evidentiary documentation; and

determining that the user has a legal right to access the evidentiary documentation when the user identification information matches the received interested party identification information or when the user identification information matches identification information described in the received evidentiary documentation; and

enabling the user to access the evidentiary documentation.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein matching involves receiving data objects from multiple data sources, and determining an appropriate identification tuple for a destination data source that draws attributes from a plurality of the data sources.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein identification information associated with objects or persons is entered by law enforcement officers at the scene of the incident through the use of an electronic device capable of sending and receiving messages over a public network.

11. A system for secure evidence sharing, comprising:

a user interface component configured to, at least;

receive identification information associated with a party;

receive a request for evidentiary documentation from the party; and

receive one or more instances of electronic evidentiary documentation associated with an incident involving law enforcement and the party;

a party identification component configured at least to identify at least one interested party to notify based at least in part on the received identification information or information associated with the received evidentiary documentation; and

a client notification component configured at least to notify the identified interested party with respect to the evidentiary documentation.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein a new component or one of the already mentioned components further configured converts received electronic evidentiary documentation of a first format into electronic evidentiary documentation of a second format.

13. The system of claim 11, wherein receipt of the request for evidentiary documentation causes the party identification component to identify one or more providers of the requested evidentiary document and the client notification component to send one or more notifications to the one or more providers of the requested evidentiary documentation.

14. The system of claim 11, wherein receipt of each of the one or more instances of evidentiary documentation causes one or more components to identify interested parties and notify the identified parties with respect to the evidentiary documentation.

15. The system of claim 11, wherein the received electronic evidentiary documentation is received from a component in or incorporated by an evidence collector located remotely with respect to the system.

16. The system of claim 11, wherein a new component or one of the already mentioned components further configured at least determines a fee to charge the user for access to the electronic evidentiary documentation.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the fee determination is based at least in part on the selection by the user of at least one of:

a flat fee, a bulk ordering discounted fee plan, or a fee sharing agreement.

18. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for secure evidence sharing including instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause at least one computer to, at least:

receive identification information associated with a party;

receive electronic evidentiary documentation associated with an incident involving law enforcement and the party;

identify at least one interested party to notify based at least in part on the received identification information or information associated with the received evidentiary documentation; and

notify the identified interested party with respect to the evidentiary documentation.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 18, wherein the instructions further cause the computer at least to determine a length of storage time based at least in part on a defined statutory time period and a length of storage time purchased by the user.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 18, wherein the instructions further cause the computer to, at least:

receive indication from the interested party regarding instances in which the interested party agrees to be charged for access to the evidentiary documentation without requiring further approval; and

in response to receiving the evidentiary documentation, determine based at least in part on the received interested party indication when to collect a fee and provide access of evidentiary documentation to an interested party.