Skill Screening

• US 20130260357A1
• Filed: 03/27/2012
• Published: 10/03/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 03/27/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Tecmonic, LLC
• Original Assignee: Tecmonic, LLC
• Inventors: Reinerman-Jones, Lauren
• Application Number:
  US13/431,500
• Publication Number:
  US 20130260357A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/362
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/1053 Employment or hiring
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

A testing method enables the selection, prediction, and validation of any skill using physiological assessments, performance, and subjective responses, using a model. Determining aptitude for a task includes identifying core components of a skill related to the task, testing a first group of individuals known to possess expert skills for the task, including testing physiological response, task performance, and subjective values. Next, using statistical analyses, one or more skill indices are calculated using Bayesian classifiers, support vector machine logic, neural network logic, or regression, to produce skill indices. Next, a second group of individuals not known to possess expert skills are given the same testing, and the statistical model is used in a comparison of the second group with the first group, to predict aptitude for the task.

Claims

1. A method for establishing a battery for evaluation of at least one skill of one or more individuals or group of individuals, the method comprising:

using at least one computer to execute software stored on non-transitory media, the software configured for

a) receiving data pertaining to at least one skill to be evaluated;

b) receiving data pertaining to identification of at least three components of the at least one skill selected in step (a);

c) receiving data pertaining to the selection of at least three tasks, each task corresponding to at least one of the three components identified in step (b);

d) receiving data pertaining to the administration of the tasks selected in step (c) to one or more individuals or group of individuals;

e) receiving data pertaining to responses to the tasks administered in step (d);

f) inputting all responses recorded in step (e) into a mathematical model; and

g) evaluating the model, whereby a battery is established by a skill index output, the battery useful for evaluating skills of other individuals.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one skill selected in step (a) is decision-making.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein one of the at least three tasks is a task for physiological assessment, one is a task for performance assessment, and one is a task for subjective assessment.

4. The method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the model may be re-used with a different set of one or more individuals or group of individuals or with a different skill.

5. A method for evaluation of at least one skill of one or more individuals or group of individuals to be tested, the method comprising:

using at least one computer to execute software stored on non-transitory media, the software configured for

a) receiving data pertaining to the selection of a first set of at least one task configured to test at least one selected skill to be evaluated;

b) receiving data pertaining to the selection of a second set of at least one task configured to test at least one selected skill to be evaluated;

c) receiving data pertaining to the selection of one or more individuals or group of individuals identified as experts identified as experts at the at least one skill selected in steps (a) and (b);

d) receiving data pertaining to the administration of the first and second sets of tasks to the one or more individuals or group of individuals identified as experts;

e) receiving data pertaining to responses to the task administered in step (d);

f) inputting all responses recorded in step (e) into a model; and

g) calculating, using the received data and a mathematical model, a set of skill indices;

h) using the calculated skill indices to evaluate one or more individuals or group of individuals of unknown skill, to select an individual having high aptitude for the skill.

6. The method in accordance with claim 5, wherein the model may be re-used with any group or skill.

7. The method in accordance with claim 5, wherein the first and second sets of at least one task are administered over different periods of time.

8. The method in accordance with claim 5, wherein the second set of at least one task is administered in two sessions.

9. A method of determining aptitude for a task, comprising:

using at least one computer to execute software stored on non-transitory media, the software configured for

receiving data pertaining to a plurality of core components of a skill related to the task;

receiving data pertaining to testing of individuals known to possess expert skills for the task, for the plurality of core components, the testing including at least one of physiological response, task performance, and a subjective assessment;

calculating one or more skill indices using the received data pertaining to testing, and a statistical model including at least one of Bayesian classifiers, support vector machine logic, neural network logic, or regression;

receiving data pertaining to testing of individuals not known to possess expert skills for the task, for the plurality of core components, the testing including at least one of physiological response, task performance, and a subjective assessment;

comparing the received data pertaining to testing of individuals not known to possess expert skills and the calculated skill indices of the tested individuals known to possess expert skills, to improve a prediction of aptitude for the skill of individuals not known to possess expert skills.

10. The method according to claim 9, wherein at least one of the core components is decision making.

11. The method according to claim 9, wherein the received data pertaining to testing of individuals known to possess expert skills pertains to testing of one or more of the plurality of core components being tested more than once.

12. The method according to claim 9, wherein the received data pertaining to testing of individuals known to possess expert skills pertains to first and second tests administered at separate times, the first test being a short test, and the second test being a longer, more comprehensive test than the first test.

13. The method according to claim 12, wherein first and second test are given to individuals not known to possess expert skills, and the software further

calculates a first statistical evaluation of the results of the first and second tests of the individuals known to possess expert skills, and

calculates a second statistical evaluation of the results of the first and second tests of the individuals not known to possess expert skills, and compares the first and second statistical analysis to determine aptitude of the individuals not known to possess expert skills, for the task.

14. The method according to claim 9, wherein the software is further configured to calculate, using at least one of beta weights, variance accounted for, and minimizing covariance, an improvement to a value of the statistical model to predict aptitude of the individuals not known to be experts.

15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the software iteratively calculates after each test, to improve the statistical model.

16. The method according to claim 9, wherein a job held by the individuals known to be experts is different than a job for which the individuals not known to be experts are being evaluated.

17. The method according to claim 9, wherein the task is cognitive or physical.

18. The method according to claim 9, wherein the data received pertaining to testing is gathered at least one of before, during, and after the task is performed.

19. The method according to claim 9, wherein data received pertaining to testing pertains to the individuals detecting the presence or absence of a stimulus.

20. The method according to claim 10, wherein the plurality of core components include components of differing skill levels.