System and Method of Managing Technician Review of Medical Test Data

• US 20130261403A1
• Filed: 03/29/2012
• Published: 10/03/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 03/29/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: General Electric Company
• Original Assignee: General Electric Company
• Inventors: Young, Brian J.
• Application Number:
  US13/433,915
• Publication Number:
  US 20130261403A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/300
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063112 Skill-based matching of a person or a group to a task
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/20 for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities, e.g. managing hospital staff or surgery rooms
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems

Abstract

A system and method of managing a technician review of medical test data collected from a patient includes receiving medical test data. At least one analysis algorithm is applied to the medical test data to produce a pre-evaluation summary. The medical test data is assigned to the technician based upon an application of a triage rule to the pre-evaluation summary and the assigned medical test data is presented in a queue of work for the technician.

Claims

1. A method of managing of a technician to review medical test data collected from a patient, the method comprising:

receiving medical test data;

applying at least one analysis algorithm to the medical test data to produce at least one pre-evaluation summary of the medical test data;

applying at least one triage rule to the at least one pre-evaluation summary of the medical test data;

assigning the medical test data to the technician based upon the application of the at least one triage rule to the at least one pre-evaluation summary;

presenting an indication of the medical test data in a queue of work for the technician on a graphical display.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein applying at least one analysis algorithm comprises:

applying at least one clinical importance algorithm to the medical test data;

identifying a physiological characteristic in the medical test data from the application of the at least one clinical importance algorithm to the medical test data;

applying at least one difficulty analysis algorithm to the medical test data; and

producing an evaluation of a signal quality of the medical test data from the application of the at least one difficulty analysis algorithm to the medical test data;

wherein the pre-evaluation summary comprises the physiological characteristic and the evaluation of the signal quality.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the technician is one of a plurality of technicians and further comprising:

determining an ability of each technician of the plurality of technicians; and

determining an availability of each technician at least one technician;

wherein the application of the at least one triage rule uses the determined ability and the determined availability to assign the medical test data to a technician of the plurality of technicians.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

reordering the queue of work for the technician with the assigned medical test data based upon the physiological characteristic and the evaluation of signal quality; and

presenting the pre-evaluation summary on the graphical display with the queue of work; and

receiving a selection from the technician of medical test data for manual review from the queue of work presented on the graphical display in the order presented in the queue.

5. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

weighting the identified physiological characteristic and evaluation of the signal quality of the pre-evaluation summary according to the at least one triage rule;

wherein the indication of the medical test data is located in the queue of work for the technician based upon the identified physiological characteristic and evaluation of the signal quality weighted according to the at least one triage rule.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein the at least one clinical importance algorithm, when applied to the medical test data, identifies clinical abnormalities present in the medical test data and the physiological characteristic is a list of the identified clinical abnormalities.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the list of the identified clinical abnormalities includes an indication of the prevalence of the clinical abnormalities in the medical test data.

8. The method of claim 2, wherein the difficulty analysis algorithm applies a plurality of waveform templates, and the evaluation of the signal quality is a count of the number of templates matched by at least a portion of the medical test data.

9. The method of claim 2, wherein the evaluation of the signal quality from the difficulty analysis algorithm is a signal to noise ratio for the medical test data.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the medical test data is Holter test data.

11. A method of managing the assignment of medical test data for manual review by a technician among a plurality of technicians, the method comprising:

receiving medical test data of a completed medical test comprising a continuous physiological data recording;

conducting a medical test data pre-evaluation comprising;

applying at least one clinical importance algorithm to the continuous physiological data recording test data to identify at least one clinical abnormality present in the continuous physiological data recording; and

applying at least one difficulty analysis algorithm to the continuous physiological data recording to estimate a signal quality of the continuous physiological data recording;

evaluating an urgency of the medical test data based upon the at least one identified clinical abnormality according to at least one triage rule;

evaluating a processing time of the medical test data based upon the estimated signal quality according to the at least one triage rule;

assigning the manual review of the medical test data to a technician of the plurality of technicians based upon the evaluated urgency and processing time of the continuous physiological data recording; and

updating a work queue presented on a graphical display of the technician to include an indication of the medical test data.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising:

evaluating a work queue of each technician of the plurality of technicians based upon indications of medical test data present in the work queue to determine a time availability of each technician of the plurality of technicians;

wherein the manual review of the medical test data is assigned to the technician of the plurality of technicians based upon the determined time availability of the technician.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein updating the work queue presented on the graphical display further comprises locating the indication of the medical test data within the work queue based upon the evaluated urgency and processing time of the medical test data.

15. The method of claim 11, wherein the identification of at least one clinical abnormality present in the continuous physiological data recording further comprises providing a count of each occurrence of the identified at least one clinical abnormality present in the continuous physiological data recording.

16. The method of claim 11, wherein the at least one difficulty analysis algorithm includes a plurality of signal templates and the estimation of the signal quality of the continuous physiological data recording comprises a count of the signal templates of the plurality matched by portions of the continuous physiological data recording.

13. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

evaluating each of the technicians of the plurality of technicians on the basis of a quality of manual review performed by each of the technicians;

wherein the manual review of the medical test data is assigned to the technician of the plurality of technicians further based upon the evaluated quality of each of the plurality of technicians.

17. A system for facilitating the review of medical test data by a technician, the system comprises:

a technician workstation comprising a graphical display, the graphical display operates to present a work queue to the technician, the work queue including indications of medical test data assigned to the technician for review;

a first computer readable medium that stores at least one clinical important algorithm that when applied to medical test data, identifies at least one clinical abnormality in the medical test data;

a second computer readable medium that stores at least one difficulty algorithm that when applied to medical test data, evaluates a signal quality of the medical test data;

a third computer readable medium that stores at least one triage rule; and

a medical test analysis computer that receives medical test data, creates a pre-evaluation of the medical test data by accessing and applying the at least one clinical importance algorithm and at least one difficulty algorithm to the medical test data, assigns the medical test data to the technician based upon the at least one triage rule, and provides indication of the medical test data to the technician workstation for presentation in the work queue.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the technician is one technician of a plurality of technicians, and the technician is selected based upon the application of the at least one triage rule to the medical test data by the medical test analysis computer.

19. The system of claim 18, further comprising a fourth computer readable medium that stores a queue status of each technician of the plurality of technicians and the technician of the plurality of technicians is selected by the medical test analysis computer based upon at least in part, the queue status of each technician and the at least one triage rule.

20. The system of claim 18, further comprising a fourth computer readable medium that stores a technician evaluation of each technician of the plurality of technicians and the technician of the plurality of technicians is selected by the medical test analysis computer based upon at least in part, the technician evaluation of each technician and the at least one triage rule.