PRESCRIPTION DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM

• US 20130262145A1
• Filed: 08/30/2011
• Published: 10/03/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 08/30/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: University College Cork- National University of Ireland
• Original Assignee: University College Cork- National University of Ireland
• Inventors: Brown, Ken, Byrne, Stephen, O'Mahony, Denis, Sreenan, Cormac, Ryan, Cristin, Murphy, Sean Og
• Application Number:
  US13/819,424
• Publication Number:
  US 20130262145A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/3
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 10/60 for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/10 relating to drugs or medications, e.g. for ensuring correct administration to patients
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems

Abstract

This invention relates to a prescription decision support system of the type comprising a set of variables and domains, a first constraint base comprising a plurality of logical statements, an Assess algorithm module and a Consistent algorithm module. The logical statements of the first constraint base specify the combination of disease states and treatments that are present that should not occur in a prescription. The prescription decision support system further comprises a second constraint base comprising a plurality of logical statements, the logical statements specifying the combination of disease states and treatments, which treatments should be present in the prescription. By providing such a system, it is possible for the prescription decision to reason about complex relationships including the presence or absence of treatments, or dosages, or the presence or absence of disease states. Furthermore, the system is responsive to the specific nature of the patient'"'"'s case history.

Claims

1. A prescription decision support system comprising:

a set of variables and domains, where the variables represent treatments or disease states and dosages, severity and durations;

a first constraint base comprising a plurality of logical statements, where each statement is a logical combination of restrictions on values assigned to a subset of the variables from the set of variables and domains, and which specifies a combination of the presence or absence of a patient disease state and a treatment including at least one treatment that is present which should not occur in a prescription;

an Assess algorithm module comprising an algorithm which takes as input a subset of variables from the set of variables and domains with assigned values representing a patient case history and prescription, and which outputs an assessment of the prescription, highlighting any element of the input which violates a constraint in the first constraint base;

a Consistent algorithm module comprising an algorithm which takes as input a logical statement and an assignment of values to the variables in that statement and which determines whether or not the statement and assignment are consistent.

2. A prescription decision support system as claimed in claim 1 comprising:

a second constraint base comprising a plurality of logical statements, where each statement is a logical combination of restrictions on values assigned to a subset of variables from the set of variables and domains, and which specifies a combination of the presence or absence of patient disease states and treatments including at least one treatment that is absent, which absence should not occur in a prescription; and

in which the Assess algorithm module recommends a new treatment implied by a constraint in the second constraint base that is violated by the input, and indicates whether the new treatment violates a constraint in the first constraint base.

3. A prescription decision support system as claimed in claim 1 in which the variables are presented in a hierarchical coding scheme for diseases.

4. A prescription decision support system as claimed in claim 1 in which the variables are presented in a hierarchical coding scheme for treatments.

5. A prescription decision support system as claimed in claim 3 in which there is provided an Explode algorithm module operable to expand out the disease or treatment in the hierarchical coding scheme with all possible representations of the disease or treatment and create an updated patient case history and prescription accordingly.

6. A prescription decision support system as claimed in claim 5 in which the Assess algorithm module contains the Explode algorithm module functionality.

7. A prescription decision support system as claimed in claim 3 in which the Consistent algorithm module has means to reason about the hierarchical coding scheme.

8. A prescription decision support system as claimed in claim 1 in which the variables are associated with elements of existing coding schemes for treatments and diseases and the Assess algorithm module outputs the assessment of the prescription by referencing the existing coding schemes.

9. A computer implemented method of providing prescription decision support, the method comprising the steps of:

receiving a patient case history and prescription with information regarding a patient'"'"'s disease state and a treatment;

assigning values to a plurality of variables taken from a set of variables and domains corresponding to variables in the patient case history and prescription;

accessing a first constraint base, the constraint base comprising a plurality of logical statements, where each statement is a logical combination of restrictions on values assigned to a subset of the variables from the set of variables and domains, and which specifies a combination of the presence or absence of a patient disease state and a treatment including at least one treatment that is present which should not occur in a prescription and retrieving a logical statement from the first constraint base relevant to one or more of the variables present in the patient case history and prescription;

passing the logical statement and an assignment of the variables in that statement to a Consistent algorithm module and determining whether or not the logical statement and assignment are consistent; and

outputting an assessment of the prescription, highlighting any element of the prescription which violates a constraint in the first constraint base.

10. A computer implemented method of providing prescription decision support as claimed in claim 9 comprising the additional steps of:

accessing a second constraint base, the second constraint base comprising a plurality of logical statements, where each statement is a logical combination of restrictions on values assigned to a subset of variables from the set of variables and domains, and which specifies a combination of the presence or absence of patient disease states and treatments including at least one treatment that is absent, which absence should not occur in a prescription and retrieving a logical statement from the second constraint base relevant to one or more of the variables present in the patient case history and prescription; and

outputting a recommendation of a new treatment implied by a constraint in the second constraint base that is violated by the input

11. A computer implemented method of providing prescription decision support as claimed in claim 10 comprising the additional steps of:

checking whether the recommended new treatment violates a constraint in the first constraint base; and

indicating to a user if the recommended new treatment violates a constraint in the first constraint base.

12. A computer implemented method of providing prescription decision support as claimed in claim 9 in which the variables are presented in a hierarchical coding scheme for diseases.

13. A computer implemented method of providing prescription decision support as claimed in claim 9 in which the variables are presented in a hierarchical coding scheme for treatments.

14. A computer implemented method of providing prescription decision support as claimed in claim 12 in which the method comprises the additional steps of:

expanding out the disease or treatment in the hierarchical coding scheme with all possible representations of the disease or treatment; and

creating an updated patient case history and prescription accordingly.

15. A computer implemented method of providing prescription decision support as claimed in claim 9 in which the constraint logical statements are represented as consisting of all possible variables and constraints on combinations of those variables.

16. A computer program product having program instructions stored thereon which when implemented on a computer perform the method of claim 9.