METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LIMITING UNWANTED ON-LINE COMMUNICATION

• US 20130290451A1
• Filed: 04/23/2013
• Published: 10/31/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 04/27/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: PageBites, Inc. (Singularity Im, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: PageBites, Inc. (Singularity Im, Inc.)
• Inventors: Harik, Georges, Harik, Ralph, Borisov, Nikola, Papoutsis, Georgios
• Application Number:
  US13/868,934
• Publication Number:
  US 20130290451A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking

Abstract

A method for controlling unwelcome communication among a network of users (a) maintains for each user an account to which communication units are credited by the network according to a schedule; and (b) for each user that initiates communication with a respondent user, the network (i) determines whether or not the account of the initiator user holds greater than a predetermined number of communication units; and (ii) when the account is determined to hold greater than the predetermined number of communicating units, deducts from the account of the initiator user the predetermined number of communication units, and allows the initiated communication to proceed.

Claims

1. A method for controlling unwelcome communication among a network of users, comprising:

maintaining for each user an account to which communication units are credited by the network according to a schedule; and

for each user that initiates communication with one or more respondent users in the network;

determining a number of communication units applicable to the communication to be initiated;

determining whether or not the account of the initiator user holds greater than the number of communication units determined; and

when the account is determined to hold greater than the number of communication units determined, deducting from the account of the initiator user the number of communication units determined, and allowing the initiated communication to proceed.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of communication units is determined based upon whether or not the initiated communication is a first contact within a preceding time period.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of communication units is determined based on whether or not each respondent user responded to the initiator in a previous communication.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising filtering of messages communicated in the network.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the number of communication units is determined based on a likelihood of response by each respondent user, the likelihood of response being determined based on analysis of the filtered messages.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the filtered messages are analyzed according to one or more of the following factors:

availability of each respondent user, average probability of responding by each respondent user, and a relationship between the initiator and each respondent user.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the relationship between the initiator and each respondent user is determined based on relative positions in a contact graph, geographical proximity, a degree of acceptance of the initiator by others, a frequency of unsuccessful contact with the respondent by the initiator, a frequency of blocking of the initiator by others, and time of day.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the initiated communication is an instant message.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the respondent users are members of a discussion group or a public chat forum, and wherein the initiated communication comprises sending a message to the discussion group or the public chat forum.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the number of communication units is determined based on one or more of:

a topic being discussed in the discussion group or public chat and whether or not the initiator has been adjudged off-topic.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising maintaining an approved contact list for each user and wherein the number of communication units is determined based on whether or not the initiator appears on the approved contact list of each respondent user.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of communication units is determined based on one or more of:

a measure of intrusiveness of the initiated communication, number of respondent users, and whether or not the initiated communication is public.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein each user account is increased by one or more of:

a daily allotment of communication units and a purchase of communication units.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the daily allotment of communication units is determined by one or more of:

a desirability of the user, the user'"'"'s connectedness to other users in the network, and personal information revealed by the user to the network.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the desirability of the user is determined according to one of:

number of users who view that user as being distinguished or trustworthy, number of users who are willing to accept or respond to communication initiated by that user, and how often the user'"'"'s broadcast messages are tagged.

16. The method of claim 13, further comprising changing the daily allotment of communication units based on a review on a user'"'"'s communication.

33. The method of claim 1, wherein communication comprise one or more of:

text-based communication, audio and video calls, video clips, photographs and audio messages.

17. A system for controlling unwelcome communication among a network of users, comprising:

a communication server element that intermediates communication among the users;

an analysis element that analyzes and filters communication intermediated by the communication server element among the users;

a policy element that maintains rules of communication applicable to the communication among the users that is intermediated by the communication server; and

an accounting system element that maintains for each user a user account of communication units, wherein, for each communication intermediated at the request of an initiator, the accounting system deducts a number of communication units from the initiator'"'"'s account.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the accounting system element credits communication units to each user account according to a schedule.

19. The system of claim 17, wherein the policy element determines the number of communication units to be deducted based upon whether or not the initiated communication is a first contact within a preceding time period.

20. The system of claim 17, wherein the policy element determines the number of communication units based on whether or not each respondent user responded to the initiator in a previous communication.

21. The system of claim 17, wherein the analysis element determines a likelihood of response by each respondent user, the likelihood of response being determined based on analysis of the filtered messages.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the filtered messages are analyzed according to one or more of the following factors:

availability of each respondent user, average probability of responding by each respondent user, and a relationship between the initiator and each respondent user.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein the relationship between the initiator and each respondent user is determined based on relative positions in a contact graph, geographical proximity, a degree of acceptance of the initiator by others, a frequency of unsuccessful contact with the respondent by the initiator, a frequency of blocking of the initiator by others, and time of day.

24. The system of claim 17, wherein the initiated communication is one of:

an instant message and a message sent to a discussion group or public chat forum.

25. The system of claim 24, wherein the policy element determines the number of communication units based on one or more of:

a topic being discussed in the discussion group or public chat, and whether or not the initiator has been adjudged off-topic.

26. The system of claim 17, wherein each user is associated with an approved contact list and wherein the policy element determines the number of communication units based on whether or not the initiator appears on the approved contact list of each respondent user.

27. The system of claim 17, wherein the policy element determines the number of communication units based on one or more of:

a measure of intrusiveness of the initiated communication, number of respondent users, and whether or not the initiated communication is public.

28. The system of claim 17, wherein the accounting system element increases each user account by one or more of:

a daily allotment of communication units and a purchase of communication units.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein the daily allotment of communication units is determined by one or more of:

a desirability of the user, the user'"'"'s connectedness to other users in the network, and personal information revealed by the user to the network.

30. The system of claim 29, wherein the desirability of the user is determined according to one of:

number of users who view that user as being distinguished or trustworthy, number of users who are willing to accept or respond to communication initiated by that user, and how often the user'"'"'s broadcast messages are tagged.

31. The system of claim 28, wherein the accounting system element changes the daily allotment of communication units based on a review on a user'"'"'s communication.

32. The system of claim 17, wherein communication comprise one or more of:

text-based communication, audio and video calls, video clips, photographs and audio messages.