Self-Testing Features of Sensing and Control Electronics for a Power Grid Protection System

• US 20130308229A1
• Filed: 05/21/2013
• Published: 11/21/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 05/21/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Techhold, LLC
• Original Assignee: Emprimus, LLC
• Inventors: FAXVOG, FREDERICK R., JENSEN, WALLACE, NOE, TERRANCE R., EID, CRAIG, JACKSON, DAVID BLAKE, FUCHS, GREG, NORDLING, GALE
• Granted Patent: US 9,077,172 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 361/35
• CPC Class Codes: H02H 3/331 responsive to earthing of the neutral conductor H02H3/338 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H02H 3/338 also responsive to wiring error, e.g. loss of neutral, break
• CPC Class Codes: H02H 7/04 for transformers

Abstract

Systems and method for detecting potentially harmful harmonic and direct current signals at a transformer are disclosed. One system includes a protection circuit electrically connected to a transformer neutral, the transformer electrically connected to a power grid, the protection circuit including a DC blocking component positioned between the transformer neutral and ground and one or more switches selectively actuated to form a path between the transformer neutral and ground in the event of unwanted DC current at the transformer neutral. The system also includes a control circuit electrically connected to the protection circuit and positioned to selectively actuate the switches based on observed conditions within the protection circuit. The system further includes a plurality of test connections disposed within the protection circuit and useable to test electrical properties of the protection circuit.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

a protection circuit electrically connected to a transformer neutral, the transformer electrically connected to a power grid, the protection circuit including a DC blocking component positioned between the transformer neutral and ground and one or more switches selectively actuated to form a path between the transformer neutral and ground in the event of unwanted DC current at the transformer neutral;

a control circuit electrically connected to the protection circuit and positioned to selectively actuate the switches based on observed conditions within the protection circuit;

a plurality of test connections disposed within the protection circuit and useable to test electrical properties of the protection circuit.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the protection circuit is electrically connected to a SCADA system remote from the protection circuit and control circuit, and wherein the SCADA system is electrically connected to the plurality of test connections for remote testing of electrical properties of the protection circuit.

3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of detection components electrically connected to one or more electrical signal lines leading from one or more connection points on a power grid.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the control circuit comprises a controller positioned within an interior volume of an electromagnetically shielded enclosure and receiving an output from each of the plurality of detection components, the controller including a plurality of test thresholds, and configured to drive at least one circuit component electrically connected to the transformer neutral in response to sensing a signal from one of the plurality of detection component of a detected harmonic or direct current signal above a respective one of the plurality of test thresholds.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the plurality of detection components are selected from a group of detectors consisting of:

a harmonic analyzer;

a shunt resistor electrically connected between the transformer neutral and a ground;

a Hall effect current sensor connected across a grounding line, the grounding line connected between the transformer neutral and a ground; and

an electromagnetic field detector.

6. The system of claim 5, further comprising:

a shielded enclosure having an interior volume, the shielded enclosure configured to shield the interior volume from electromagnetic interference;

a plurality of filters positioned along a periphery of the shielded enclosure and connected to the electrical signal lines, the electrical signal lines extending into the interior volume from external to the shielded enclosure, the filters configured to prevent high frequency, high power electromagnetic signals from entering the shielded enclosure.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the harmonic analyzer is positioned within the shielded enclosure.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein the shunt resistor is positioned external to the shielded enclosure.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the Hall Effect current sensor is positioned external to the shielded enclosure.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the electromagnetic field detector is positioned external to the shielded enclosure.

11. The system of claim 4, wherein the controller is configured to open a normally-closed switch connected between the transformer neutral and a ground connection.

12. The system of claim 4, wherein the controller is configured to open the normally-closed switch upon detection of a harmonic or direct current signal above a threshold on the transformer neutral.

13. The system of claim 4, wherein the indication received from at least one of the plurality of threshold detectors represents a detected harmonic, a direct current signal, or an electromagnetic pulse above a threshold associated with that threshold detector.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the controller is configured to, during normal operation of the system, communicate status information regarding signals received from each of the detection components to the remote system.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the system is located at a power substation, and wherein the remote system is located at a central control station and includes the SCADA system.

16. The system of claim 4, wherein the controller is configured to execute one or more self-test procedures, the self-test procedures configured to confirm that the system operates as expected in the event of damaging of degrading events.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the one or more self-test procedures are selected from a group of procedures consisting of:

applying an alternating current signal at the transformer, the alternating current signal having a frequency different from that of the power system frequency;

applying a harmonic signal at a harmonic analyzer, the harmonic signal having an amplitude above the preset threshold defined by a threshold detector associated with the harmonic analyzer, the threshold defining a range of amplitudes;

applying a direct current (DC) voltage signal at the transformer neutral to simulate direct current received at the transformer neutral and

applying an electromagnetic (EM) detector signal, the EM signal having an amplitude above the preset threshold defined by a threshold detector, the threshold defining a range of amplitudes.

18. A method comprising:

transmitting one or more electrical signals from a protection circuit to a remote system, the protection circuit electrically connected between a transformer neutral of a transformer in a power grid and ground, wherein the remote system periodically assesses operation of the protection circuit based on the one or more electrical signals; and

receiving at a control circuit electrically connected to the protection circuit one or more commands from the remote system to actuate one or more switches in the protection circuit, thereby testing an alternative configuration of the protection circuit.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

receiving a plurality of detector signals at a controller forming a portion of the control circuit, the controller housed within an electromagnetically-shielded enclosure, and the detector signals including a harmonic detector signal and a direct current detector signal;

sampling each of the plurality of detector signals to detect a peak value over a predetermined period;

comparing each of the peak values to a corresponding remotely-set test threshold associated with that signal type, and, based on that comparison, generating one or more alarms if the remotely-set test threshold is exceeded; and

communicating at least the one or more alarms to the remote system.

20. The method of claim 19, further comprising communicating each of the peak values to the remote system.

21. The method of claim 18, further comprising periodically performing one or more self-test procedures, the self-test procedures configured to confirm that the controller and electrical protection circuit operate as expected in the event of damaging of degrading events.