EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS

• US 20130311651A1
• Filed: 07/24/2013
• Published: 11/21/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 01/31/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Kyndryl Incorporated (Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Vijayan, Geetha, Olsson, Stig A., Smetanka, Terrence D.
• Granted Patent: US 9,253,057 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/0706 the processing taking place on a specific hardware platform or in a specific software environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/0751 Error or fault detection not based on redundancy power supply failures G06F1/30; network fault management H04L41/06
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/079 Root cause analysis, i.e. error or fault diagnosis in a hardware test environment G06F11/22; in a software test environment G06F11/36
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/302 where the computing system component is a software system
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3409 for performance assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/06 Generation of reports
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/535 Tracking the activity of the user network monitoring arrangements H04L43/00; recording of computer activity G06F11/34

Abstract

A method and system for evaluating performance of software applications of different web sites. Steps in a first software application of a first web site are mapped to respective similar-function steps in a second software application of a second web site. The mapping for each step in the first software application includes associating both each step in the first software application and the respective similar-function step in the second software with a respective task. Measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application and measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps and of other steps in the second software application are determined and included in a report. A measure of performance of the first software application and a measure of performance of the second software application are included in the report.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating performance of software applications of different web sites, the method comprising:

mapping, by one or more processors, a plurality of steps in a first software application of a first web site to a respective plurality of similar-function steps in a second software application of a second web site, wherein the mapping for each of the plurality of steps in the first software application includes associating both each step in the first software application and the respective similar-function step in the second software application with a respective first task of a plurality of first tasks; and

determining, by the one or more processors, and including in a report as a comparison, measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application and measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps and of other steps in the second software application;

determining, by the one or more processors, and including in the report, a measure of performance of the first software application based on the measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application; and

determining, by the one or more processors, and including in the report, a measure of performance of the second software application based on the measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps in the second software application and of the other steps in the second software application.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining, by the one or more processors, the measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application and the measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps and of the other steps in the second software application, including collecting and statistically analyzing data that measures performance of each mapped step in the first software application, the respective similar-function steps in the second software application, and the other steps in the second software application.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining, by one or more processors, the other steps in the second software application as being steps in the second software application that are associated with a plurality of second tasks such that each second task is not comprised by the plurality of first tasks, wherein the other steps in the second software application do not correspond to any of the mapped steps in the first software application.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

including in the report, by the one or more processors, the measure of performance of the first software application, the measure of performance of the second software application, the plurality of first tasks, the plurality of second tasks, the plurality of steps in the first software application, the plurality of respective similar-function steps in the second software application, and the other steps in the second software application.

5. The method of claim 4, the method comprising:

generating, the one or more processors, the report that includes a table,

wherein the table includes a row for each first task and for each second task, a first column comprising the mapped steps in the first software application, a second column comprising both the respective similar-function steps and the other steps in the second software application, a third column comprising the measure of performance of the first software application and the measure of performance of the mapped steps in the first software application, a fourth column comprising the measure of performance of the second software application and the measure of performance of both the respective similar-function steps and the other steps in the second software application, and a fifth column of other software applications supporting the mapped steps in the first software application,

wherein each mapped step in the first software application and the respective similar-function step in the second software application associated with a respective first task of the plurality of first tasks appears in the row pertaining to the respective first task, and

wherein each other step in the second software application associated with a respective second task of the plurality of second tasks appears in the row pertaining to the respective second task.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

posting the report to a web site and/or sending the report by email to an email recipient.

7. A computer program product for evaluating performance of software applications of different web sites, the computer program product comprising one or more computer-readable storage devices and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more storage devices, the program instructions comprising:

program instructions to map a plurality of steps in a first software application of a first web site to a respective plurality of similar-function steps in a second software application of a second web site, including for each of the plurality of steps in the first software application program instructions to associate both each step in the first software application and the respective similar-function step in the second software application with a respective first task of a plurality of first tasks; and

program instructions to determine, and to include in a report as a comparison, measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application and measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps and of other steps in the second software application;

program instructions to determine, and to include in the report, a measure of performance of the first software application based on the measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application; and

program instructions to determine, and to include in the report, a measure of performance of the second software application based on the measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps in the second software application and of the other steps in the second software application.

8. The computer program product of claim 7, further comprising:

program instructions to determine the measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application and the measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps and of the other steps in the second software application, including program instructions to collect and statistically analyze data that measures performance of each mapped step in the first software application, the respective similar-function steps in the second software application, and the other steps in the second software application.

9. The computer program product of claim 7, further comprising:

program instructions to determine other steps in the second software application as being steps in the second software application that are associated with a plurality of second tasks such that each second task is not comprised by the plurality of first tasks, wherein the other steps in the second software application do not correspond to any of the mapped steps in the first software application.

10. The computer program product of claim 9, further comprising:

program instructions to include in the report the measure of performance of the first software application, the measure of performance of the second software application, the plurality of first tasks, the plurality of second tasks, the plurality of steps in the first software application, the plurality of respective similar-function steps in the second software application, and the other steps in the second software application.

11. The computer program product of claim 10, the method comprising:

program instructions to generate the report that includes a table,

wherein the table includes a row for each first task and for each second task, a first column comprising the mapped steps in the first software application, a second column comprising both the respective similar-function steps and the other steps in the second software application, a third column comprising the measure of performance of the first software application and the measure of performance of the mapped steps in the first software application, a fourth column comprising the measure of performance of the second software application and the measure of performance of both the respective similar-function steps and the other steps in the second software application, and a fifth column of other software applications supporting the mapped steps in the first software application,

wherein each mapped step in the first software application and the respective similar-function step in the second software application associated with a respective first task of the plurality of first tasks appears in the row pertaining to the respective first task, and

wherein each other step in the second software application associated with a respective second task of the plurality of second tasks appears in the row pertaining to the respective second task.

12. The computer program product of claim 7, further comprising:

program instructions to post the report to a web site and/or to send the report by email to an email recipient.

13. A computer system for evaluating performance of software applications of different web sites, the computer system comprising:

one or more processors, one or more computer-readable memories, one or more computer-readable storage devices, and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more storage devices for execution by at least one of the one or more processors via at least one of the one or more memories, the program instructions comprising;

program instructions to map a plurality of steps in a first software application of a first web site to a respective plurality of similar-function steps in a second software application of a second web site, including for each of the plurality of steps in the first software application program instructions to associate both each step in the first software application and the respective similar-function step in the second software application with a respective first task of a plurality of first tasks; and

program instructions to determine, and to include in a report as a comparison, measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application and measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps and of other steps in the second software application;

program instructions to determine, and to include in the report, a measure of performance of the first software application based on the measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application; and

program instructions to determine, and to include in the report, a measure of performance of the second software application based on the measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps in the second software application and of the other steps in the second software application.

14. The computer system of claim 13, further comprising:

program instructions to determine the measures of performance of each mapped step in the first software application and the measures of performance of the respective similar-function steps and of the other steps in the second software application, including program instructions to collect and statistically analyze data that measures performance of each mapped step in the first software application, the respective similar-function steps in the second software application, and the other steps in the second software application.

15. The computer system of claim 13, further comprising:

program instructions to determine other steps in the second software application as being steps in the second software application that are associated with a plurality of second tasks such that each second task is not comprised by the plurality of first tasks, wherein the other steps in the second software application do not correspond to any of the mapped steps in the first software application.

16. The computer system of claim 15, further comprising:

program instructions to include in the report the measure of performance of the first software application, the measure of performance of the second software application, the plurality of first tasks, the plurality of second tasks, the plurality of steps in the first software application, the plurality of respective similar-function steps in the second software application, and the other steps in the second software application.

17. The computer system of claim 16, the method comprising:

program instructions to generate the report that includes a table,

wherein the table includes a row for each first task and for each second task, a first column comprising the mapped steps in the first software application, a second column comprising both the respective similar-function steps and the other steps in the second software application, a third column comprising the measure of performance of the first software application and the measure of performance of the mapped steps in the first software application, a fourth column comprising the measure of performance of the second software application and the measure of performance of both the respective similar-function steps and the other steps in the second software application, and a fifth column of other software applications supporting the mapped steps in the first software application,

wherein each mapped step in the first software application and the respective similar-function step in the second software application associated with a respective first task of the plurality of first tasks appears in the row pertaining to the respective first task, and

wherein each other step in the second software application associated with a respective second task of the plurality of second tasks appears in the row pertaining to the respective second task.

18. The computer system of claim 13, further comprising:

program instructions to post the report to a web site and/or to send the report by email to an email recipient.