METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USE OF AN APPLICATION WHEEL USER INTERFACE AND VERIFIED ASSESSMENTS IN HIRING DECISIONS

• US 20130317997A1
• Filed: 05/28/2013
• Published: 11/28/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 05/25/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: JPMS Incorporated
• Original Assignee: JPMS Incorporated
• Inventors: Sjoblom, Preston Leigh
• Application Number:
  US13/904,016
• Publication Number:
  US 20130317997A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/321
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/04817 using icons graphical or visual programming using iconic symbols G06F8/34
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0482 Interaction with lists of selectable items, e.g. menus
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/1053 Employment or hiring
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/01 Social networking

Abstract

A method and system are disclosed for using verified assessments of employee capabilities in hiring decisions, where the method and system are implemented via applications displayed as icons on a rotatable wheel structure. The verified assessments are of criteria applicable to a group of employees, where the criteria are weighted in accordance with attributes of the group and the hiring decisions depend upon the weighted criteria applied to the assessments of the employee and upon a rating of the group. An arc of the wheel structure is displayed, exposing a subset of applications, the wheel structure being rotatable to expose additional applications within the displayed arc.

Claims

1. A method for using verified assessments of employee capabilities in hiring decisions, comprising:

obtaining verified assessments of employee capabilities with respect to a plurality of performance criteria;

weighting the performance criteria in accordance with a job description group to which the employee belongs;

applying the weighted performance criteria to the verified assessments;

rating the group; and

making a hiring decision by combining the applied weighted performance criteria and the group rating.

2. A method as in claim 1, wherein the verified assessment is made by a prior employer by applying a numerical scale to criteria on an assessment matrix.

3. A method as in claim 2, wherein the verified assessment is completed in several parts over several weeks.

4. A method as in claim 3, wherein a reminder is sent to an evaluator who has not completed an assessment part as scheduled.

5. A method as in claim 1, wherein the performance criteria are adapted to the job description of a student and the hiring decision is acceptance at a higher level institution of learning.

6. A system for using verified assessments of employee capabilities in hiring decisions, comprising:

means for obtaining verified assessments of employee capabilities with respect to a plurality of performance criteria;

means for weighting the performance criteria in accordance with a job description group to which the employee belongs;

means for applying the weighted performance criteria to the verified assessments;

means for rating the group; and

means for making a hiring decision by combining the applied weighted performance criteria and the group rating.

7. A system as in claim 6, wherein the verified assessment is made by a prior employer by applying a numerical scale to criteria on an assessment matrix.

8. A system as in claim 7, wherein the verified assessment is completed in several parts over several weeks.

9. A system as in claim 8, wherein a reminder is sent to an evaluator who has not completed an assessment part as scheduled.

10. A system as in claim 6, wherein the performance criteria are adapted to the job description of a student and the hiring decision is acceptance at a higher level institution of learning.

11. A method for displaying computer applications to a user, comprising:

arranging the computer applications as icons along a perimeter of a wheel structure;

displaying an arc of the perimeter, thereby exposing a subset of the applications;

rotating the wheel structure, thereby exposing additional applications within the displayed arc; and

rearranging the icons so that those applications most often used are in the displayed arc.

12. A method as in claim 11, wherein there are first and second wheel structures and corresponding displayed arcs.

13. A method as is claim 12, wherein the first and second wheel structures are toggled in the same display, replacing each other by pressing a button.

14. A method as in claim 11, wherein the wheel structure reduces to an icon when a selected application requires room on the display.

15. A method as claim 12, wherein the first and second wheel structures are in the same display, the first wheel structure being dominant and the second wheel structure being displayed within the arc of the first wheel structure.

16. A system for displaying computer applications to a user, comprising:

means for arranging the computer applications as icons along a perimeter of a wheel structure;

means for displaying an arc of the perimeter, thereby exposing a subset of the applications;

means for rotating the wheel structure, thereby exposing additional applications within the displayed arc; and

rearranging the icons so that those applications most often used are in the displayed arc.

17. A system as in claim 16, wherein there are first and second wheel structures and corresponding displayed arcs.

18. A system as is claim 17, wherein the first and second wheel structures are toggled in the same display, replacing each other by pressing a button.

19. A system as in claim 16, wherein the wheel structure reduces to an icon when a selected application requires room on the display.

20. A system as claim 17, wherein the first and second wheel structures are in the same display, the first wheel structure being dominant and the second wheel structure being displayed within the arc of the first wheel structure.