INTEGRATING COLLABORATIVELY PROPOSED CHANGES AND PUBLISHING

• US 20130326330A1
• Filed: 06/01/2012
• Published: 12/05/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 06/01/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)
• Inventors: Johnston, Scott M., Gunn, Ian, Harris, Jeff
• Application Number:
  US13/486,561
• Publication Number:
  US 20130326330A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/234
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/166 Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/197 Version control for software G06F8/71

Abstract

Systems and methods are disclosed herein for integrating collaboratively proposed changes and publishing an electronic document among multiple users, each user having a different level of access and rights to the document. A first suggested edit to the electronic document is received from a reviewer, and a markup version of the electronic document is updated to reflect the first suggested edit. An acceptance or a rejection of the first suggested edit is received from an editor. In response to receiving an acceptance of the first suggested edit, the first suggested edit is converted to an accepted edit, yielding a second updated markup version. The clean version of the electronic document is updated with the accepted edit, and the updated clean version is published.

Claims

1. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing computer executable instructions, which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to carry out a method for integrating collaboratively proposed changes from a plurality of users and publishing an electronic document, comprising:

receiving a first suggested edit to the electronic document from a reviewer;

updating a markup version of the electronic document to reflect the first suggested edit;

receiving an acceptance or a rejection of the first suggested edit from an editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the first suggested edit from the editor,

converting the first suggested edit in the updated markup version to an accepted edit, yielding a second updated markup version;

updating a clean version of the electronic document with the accepted edit; and

publishing the updated clean version.

2. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the reviewer and the editor simultaneously access the electronic document.

3. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the reviewer is a user with a first authorization level and the editor is a user with a second authorization level greater than the first authorization level.

4. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

receiving a comment on the electronic document from the reviewer;

updating the markup version to reflect the comment.

5. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

receiving an edit from the editor;

updating the markup version with the edit; and

updating the clean version with the edit.

6. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

receiving a request from the reviewer and/or the editor to view the clean version of the electronic document; and

publishing the clean version.

7. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein a viewer is a user authorized to view the clean version and unauthorized to view the markup version.

8. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7, wherein the method further comprises:

receiving a request from the viewer to become a reviewer for the electronic document;

transmitting the request to the editor;

receiving an acceptance or a rejection of the request from the editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the request,

converting the viewer to a second reviewer;

granting access to the markup version of the electronic document to the second reviewer;

receiving a second suggested edit from the second reviewer;

in response to receiving a rejection of the request,

notifying the viewer of the rejection of the request.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

receiving a request from the reviewer to become an editor for the electronic document;

transmitting the request to the editor;

receiving an acceptance or a rejection of the request from the editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the request,

converting the reviewer to a second editor;

in response to receiving a rejection of the request,

notifying the reviewer of the rejection of the request.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises monitoring data corresponding to interactions with the electronic document by a user.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises storing and displaying metadata corresponding to a revision history of the electronic document to the editor.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises providing an updated version of the electronic document to a user when prompted by the user.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises notifying a user that the markup and/or clean versions of the electronic document have been updated.

14. A method for integrating collaboratively proposed changes from a plurality of users and publishing an electronic document, comprising:

receiving a first suggested edit to the electronic document from a reviewer;

updating a markup version of the electronic document to reflect the first suggested edit;

receiving an acceptance or a rejection of the first suggested edit from an editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the first suggested edit from the editor,

converting the first suggested edit in the updated markup version to an accepted edit, yielding a second updated markup version;

updating a clean version of the electronic document with the accepted edit; and

publishing the updated clean version.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the reviewer and the editor simultaneously access the electronic document.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the reviewer is a user with a first authorization level and the editor is a user with a second authorization level greater than the first authorization level.

17. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

receiving a comment on the electronic document from the reviewer;

updating the markup version to reflect the comment.

18. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

receiving an edit from the editor;

updating the markup version with the edit; and

updating the clean version with the edit.

19. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

receiving a request from the reviewer and/or the editor to view the clean version of the electronic document; and

publishing the clean version.

20. The method of claim 14, wherein a viewer is a user authorized to view the clean version and unauthorized to view the markup version.

21. The method of claim 20, further comprising:

receiving a request from the viewer to become a reviewer for the electronic document;

transmitting the request to the editor;

receiving an acceptance or a rejection of the request from the editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the request,

converting the viewer to a second reviewer;

granting access to the markup version of the electronic document to the second reviewer;

receiving a second suggested edit from the second reviewer;

in response to receiving a rejection of the request,

notifying the viewer of the rejection of the request.

22. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

receiving a request from the reviewer to become an editor for the electronic document;

transmitting the request to the editor;

receiving an acceptance or a rejection of the request from the editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the request,

converting the reviewer to a second editor;

in response to receiving a rejection of the request,

notifying the reviewer of the rejection of the request.

23. The method of claim 14, further comprising monitoring data corresponding to interactions with the electronic document by a user.

24. The method of claim 14, further comprising storing and displaying metadata corresponding to a revision history of the electronic document to the editor.

25. The method of claim 14, further comprising providing an updated version of the electronic document to a user when prompted by the user.

26. The method of claim 14, further comprising notifying a user that the markup and/or clean versions of the electronic document have been updated.

27. A system for integrating collaboratively proposed changes from a plurality of users and publishing an electronic document, comprising a processor configured to:

receive a first suggested edit to the electronic document from a reviewer;

update a markup version of the electronic document to reflect the first suggested edit;

receive an acceptance or a rejection of the first suggested edit from an editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the first suggested edit from the editor,

convert the first suggested edit in the updated markup version to an accepted edit, yielding a second updated markup version;

update a clean version of the electronic document with the accepted edit; and

publish the updated clean version.

28. The system of claim 27, wherein the reviewer and the editor simultaneously access the electronic document.

29. The system of claim 27, wherein the reviewer is a user with a first authorization level and the editor is a user with a second authorization level greater than the first authorization level.

30. The system of claim 27, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive a comment on the electronic document from the reviewer;

update the markup version to reflect the comment.

31. The system of claim 27, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive an edit from the editor;

update the markup version with the edit; and

update the clean version with the edit.

32. The system of claim 27, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive a request from the reviewer and/or the editor to view the clean version of the electronic document; and

publish the clean version.

33. The system of claim 27, wherein a viewer is a user authorized to view the clean version and unauthorized to view the markup version.

34. The system of claim 33, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive a request from the viewer to become a reviewer for the electronic document;

transmit the request to the editor;

receive an acceptance or a rejection of the request from the editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the request,

convert the viewer to a second reviewer;

grant access to the markup version of the electronic document to the second reviewer;

receive a second suggested edit from the second reviewer;

in response to receiving a rejection of the request,

notify the viewer of the rejection of the request.

35. The system of claim 27, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive a request from the reviewer to become an editor for the electronic document;

transmit the request to the editor;

receive an acceptance or a rejection of the request from the editor;

in response to receiving an acceptance of the request,

convert the reviewer to a second editor;

in response to receiving a rejection of the request,

notify the reviewer of the rejection of the request.

36. The system of claim 27, wherein the processor is further configured to monitor data corresponding to interactions with the electronic document by a user.

37. The system of claim 27, wherein the processor is further configured to store and display metadata corresponding to a revision history of the electronic document to the editor.

38. The system of claim 27, wherein the processor is further configured to provide an updated version of the electronic document to a user when prompted by the user.

39. The system of claim 27, wherein the processor is further configured to notify a user that the markup and/or clean versions of the electronic document have been updated.