PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS

• US 20130332368A1
• Filed: 06/08/2012
• Published: 12/12/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 06/08/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: eTask Technologies Ltd.
• Original Assignee: eTask Technologies Ltd.
• Inventors: MANRIQUE, JUAN M.
• Application Number:
  US13/492,266
• Publication Number:
  US 20130332368A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/301
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/103 Workflow collaboration or project management

Abstract

Project management systems and methods utilizing project components that are stored in a components library and which provide for the input of quality compliance parameters, the empirical analysis of real time project execution information, and the feedback of real-time project execution information to the components library.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

providing an executive management interface for creating a project blueprint based on components stored in a components library;

providing for the input of at least one quality compliance parameter for a project;

providing a project management interface for executing a project based at least in part on the project blueprint;

providing an empirical analysis module configured to collect real time project execution information;

comparing the real time project execution information to historical information stored in the components library or project blueprint;

providing for feedback of real-time project execution information to the components library.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the components include historical execution information and wherein the at least one quality compliance parameter includes an allowed deviation from historical execution information.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the components include historical execution information expressed as an average, mean or standard deviation and the at least one quality compliance parameter includes an allowed deviation from historical execution information expressed in terms of a multiple of the standard deviation or a percent deviation from the average or mean.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one quality compliance parameter includes an allowed ad hoc task density.

5. The method of claim 4 where the allowed ad hoc task density is determined from a process maturity metric.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising providing a notification to the executive management interface based on the comparison of the real-time project execution information with the historical information stored in the components library or project blueprint.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein an ad hoc task density is determined during project execution and a notification to the executive management interface is provided based on the determination of the ad hoc task density.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising calculation of stability metrics based on the real time project execution information.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising calculation of asset utilization metrics based on the real time project execution information.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the providing for feedback of real time project execution information to the components library includes an incorporation of real time project execution information into component historical execution information.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the real time project execution information includes cost or effort information.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein the real time project execution information includes textual information relating to best practices for implementing the component.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein the real time project execution information is first sent to an executive management interface for approval prior to its incorporation into the component historical execution information.

14. The method of claim 1 further comprising sharing components in a collaborative library.

29. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one component in the project blueprint includes a personnel requirement and the personnel requirement is compared to the real time project execution information including information about personnel actually assigned to a task.

15. A system comprising:

a components library;

an executive management interface configured to allow creation of a project blueprint based on components stored in the components library and configured to allow the input of at least one quality compliance parameter for a project;

a project management interface configured to allow execution of a project based at least in part on the project blueprint; and

,

an empirical analysis module configured to collect real time project execution information;

wherein the real time project execution information is compared to historical information stored in the components library or the project blueprint and feedback of the real time project execution information is provided to the components library.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the components include historical execution information and wherein the at least one quality compliance parameter includes an allowed deviation from historical execution information.

17. The system of claim 15 wherein the components include historical execution information expressed as an average, mean or standard deviation and the at least one quality compliance parameter includes an allowed deviation from historical execution information expressed in terms of a multiple of the standard deviation or a percent deviation from the average or mean.

18. The system of claim 15 wherein the at least one quality compliance parameter includes an allowed ad hoc task density.

19. The system of claim 18 where the allowed ad hoc task density is determined from a process maturity metric.

20. The system of claim 15 wherein a notification is provided to the executive management interface based on the comparison of the real time project execution information with the historical information stored in the components library or project blueprint.

21. The system of claim 15 wherein ad hoc task density is determined during project execution and a notification to the executive management interface is provided based on the determination of the ad hoc task density.

22. The system of claim 15 further comprising calculation of stability metrics based on the real time project execution information.

23. The system of claim 15 further comprising calculation of asset utilization metrics based on the real time project execution information.

24. The system of claim 15 wherein the feedback of real time project execution information to the components library includes an incorporation of real time project execution information into component historical execution information.

25. The system of claim 24 wherein the real time project execution information includes cost or effort information.

26. The system of claim 24 wherein the real time project execution information includes textual information relating to best practices for implementing the component.

27. The system of claim 24 wherein the real time project execution information is first sent to the executive management interface for approval prior to its incorporation into the component historical execution information.

28. The system of claim 15 further comprising a collaborative library configured to share components.

30. The system of claim 15 wherein at least one component in the project blueprint includes a personnel requirement and the personnel requirement is compared to the real time project execution information including information about personnel actually assigned to a task.