SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING VIRTUAL ARBITRATION

• US 20130339256A1
• Filed: 11/16/2011
• Published: 12/19/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 11/16/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Shardul Suresh Shroff
• Original Assignee: Shardul Suresh Shroff
• Inventors: Shroff, Shardul Suresh
• Application Number:
  US13/988,011
• Publication Number:
  US 20130339256A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/309
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/105 Human resources
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/182 Alternative dispute resolution
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/188 Electronic negotiation
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 65/403 Arrangements for multi-party communication, e.g. for conferences data switching systems for conference H04L12/18; arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities H04M3/56; television conferencing systems H04N7/15

Abstract

A system for facilitating users to perform automated arbitration proceeding over a communication network via a virtual arbitration centre in a cloud computing environment is provided. The system comprises virtual arbitration modules in the virtual arbitration centre to provide cloud-based arbitration service over the communication network to users at remote locations. The system further comprises electronic devices to facilitate the users to access the cloud-based virtual arbitration service via a web-based user interface on the electronic devices. The virtual arbitration modules comprise a cloud-based repository configured to store predetermined rules and data related to arbitration. The virtual arbitration modules further comprise a case management module to facilitate secure cloud-based communication of the arbitration related data between the users and to facilitate the users to conduct an auto mated online arbitration proceeding by performing cloud computing on the arbitration related data and the predetermined rules employing cloud computing components.

Claims

1. A system for facilitating users to perform automated arbitration proceeding over a communication network via a virtual arbitration centre, the system comprising:

one or more virtual arbitration modules configured to provide users at remote locations access to the virtual arbitration centre via a web-based user interface on the users'"'"' electronic devices, wherein the one or more virtual arbitration modules comprises;

a cloud-based repository configured to store one or more predetermined rules and data related to arbitration; and

a case management module configured to facilitate secure communication of the arbitration related data between the users and further configured to facilitate the users to conduct an automated online arbitration proceeding using the data related to arbitration and the one or more predetermined rules.

2. A system for facilitating users to perform automated arbitration proceeding over a communication network via a virtual arbitration centre in a cloud computing environment, the system comprising:

one or more virtual arbitration modules in the virtual arbitration centre configured to provide cloud-based arbitration service over the communication network to users at remote locations;

one or more electronic devices configured to facilitate the users to access the cloud-based virtual arbitration service via a web-based user interface on the one or more electronic devices,

wherein the one or more virtual arbitration modules comprises;

a cloud-based repository configured to store one or more predetermined rules and data related to arbitration; and

a case management module configured to facilitate secure cloud-based communication of the arbitration related data between the users and further configured to facilitate the users to conduct an automated online arbitration proceeding by performing cloud computing on the arbitration related data and the one or more predetermined rules employing cloud computing components.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein the cloud computing components include at least two servers located in separate jurisdictions, each jurisdiction being neutral to all parties to arbitration.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein selection of servers located in neutral jurisdictions is based on the predetermined rules or are selected by parties to arbitration.

5. The system of claim 2, wherein the cloud computing components comprise of databases for arbitration data, the databases being located in separate jurisdictions, each jurisdiction being neutral to all parties to arbitration.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein selection of databases located in neutral jurisdictions is based on the predetermined rules or are selected by parties to arbitration.

7. The system of claim 2, wherein the case management module is configured to receive a request for conducting arbitration for a dispute case from a first party user and further configured to store data related to the dispute case in the cloud-based repository.

8. The system of claim 2, wherein the one or more virtual arbitration modules comprise a rule engine in communication with the case management module and configured to retrieve the one or more predetermined rules from the cloud-based repository for conducting the arbitration proceeding.

9. The system of claim 7, wherein the case management module is configured to automatically send notice of arbitration to a second party user using cloud-based communication.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the case management module is configured to:

automatically evaluate response to the notice of arbitration received from the second party user; and

automatically appoint a sole arbitrator or an arbitral tribunal based on the one or more predetermined rules retrieved from the cloud-based repository.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the case management module in communication with the rule engine is configured to automatically send arbitration hearing request to the first party user, the second party user and the appointed sole arbitrator user or arbitral tribunal users based on the one or more predetermined rules retrieved from the cloud-based repository.

12. The system of claim 2, wherein the one or more virtual arbitration modules comprises a payment module in communication with the case management module and configured to facilitate cloud-based payment transaction between the users and the virtual arbitration centre.

13. The system of claim 2, wherein the one or more virtual arbitration modules comprises a telepresence module in communication with the case management module and configured to facilitate the users to participate in a cloud-based online arbitration hearing.

14. The system of claim 2, wherein the case management module in communication with the rule engine is configured to generate and transmit an arbitration award to the users.

15. The system of claim 2, wherein the data related to arbitration comprises at least one of:

user data, data provided by users to the virtual arbitration centre, arbitration proceeding related data and arbitration case data.

16. The system of claim 2, wherein the cloud-based arbitration service is accessed by the users via one or more electronic devices in telepresence centers at remote locations.

17. A method for performing automated arbitration proceeding over a communication network via a virtual arbitration centre in a cloud computing environment, the method comprising the steps of

providing, by the virtual arbitration centre, a cloud-based arbitration service to users at remote locations over the communication network;

accessing the cloud-based arbitration service via a web-based user interface on the users'"'"' electronic devices, wherein the cloud-based arbitration service comprises;

storing one or more predetermined rules and arbitration related data in a cloud-based repository;

performing cloud-based communication of the arbitration related data between the users; and

conducting a cloud-based automated arbitration proceeding using the arbitration related data and the one or more predetermined rules.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein performing cloud-based communication of arbitration related data between the users comprises:

receiving request for conducting an arbitration proceeding for a dispute case from a first party user, wherein the dispute case is assigned a unique case number;

automatically sending notice of arbitration to a second party user;

automatically evaluating response to the notice of arbitration received from the second party user based on the one or more predetermined rules retrieved from the cloud-based repository for appointing one or more arbitrators;

automatically retrieving arbitration related data stored in the cloud-based repository using the assigned unique case number;

conducting online arbitration hearing between at least the first and second party users and the appointed one or more arbitrators employing the retrieved data and the one or more predetermined rules; and

providing arbitration award to the first and second parties based on the arbitration hearing.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising selecting at least two servers located in separate jurisdictions, each jurisdiction being neutral to all parties to arbitration.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein selection of servers located in neutral jurisdictions is based on the predetermined rules or are selected by parties to arbitration.

21. The method of claim 18 further comprising selecting databases for arbitration data, the databases being located in separate jurisdictions, each jurisdiction being neutral to all parties to arbitration.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein selection of databases located in neutral jurisdictions is based on the predetermined rules or are selected by parties to arbitration.

23. The method of claim 17, wherein performing cloud-based communication of arbitration related data between the users comprises:

facilitating payment transactions between the users and the virtual arbitration centre; and

facilitating the users to upload one or more documents to the virtual arbitration centre after verifying payment made by the users.

24. The method of claim 18, wherein automatically evaluating the response from the second party user based on one or more predetermined rules for appointing one or more arbitrators comprises:

automatically determining if the second party user has responded to the notice of arbitration within a predetermined time period based on the one or more predetermined rules; and

automatically appointing sole arbitrator or an arbitral tribunal nominated by the first and second party users based on the one or more predetermined rules if the second party user has responded within the predetermined time period.

25. The method of claim 18, wherein automatically evaluating the response from the second party user based on the one or more predetermined rules for appointing one or more arbitrators comprises:

automatically determining if the second party user has not responded to the notice of arbitration within a predetermined time period based on the one or more predetermined rules; and

automatically retrieving a list of arbitrators stored in the cloud-based repository for appointing a sole arbitrator or an arbitral tribunal.

26. The method of claim 18, wherein automatically evaluating the response from the second party user based on the one or more predetermined rules for appointing one or more arbitrators comprises:

automatically determining if the second party has responded to the notice of arbitration within a predetermined time period based on the one or more predetermined rules;

automatically analyzing the response received from the second party user; and

automatically retrieving a list of arbitrators stored in the repository for appointing a sole arbitrator or an arbitral tribunal if it is determined that the second party user has not agreed to the first party'"'"'s preference of sole arbitrator or arbitral tribunal as indicated in an agreement stored in the cloud-based repository.

27. The method of claim 18, wherein facilitating to conduct online arbitration hearing between at least the first and second party users and the appointed one or more arbitrators comprises:

conducting online arbitration hearing between at least the first and second party users and the appointed one or more arbitrators via telepresence.

28. The method of claim 17, wherein the arbitration related data comprises at least one of:

user data, data provided by users to the virtual arbitration centre, arbitration proceeding related data and arbitration case data.