Telenostics point of performance driver performance index

• US 20140052672A1
• Filed: 09/16/2010
• Published: 02/20/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 04/09/2010
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Incorporated (BAE Systems Plc)
• Original Assignee: BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Incorporated (BAE Systems Plc)
• Inventors: Wagner, Ronald E., Charlton, Robert, Sada, David
• Application Number:
  US12/807,919
• Publication Number:
  US 20140052672A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/500
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06398 Performance of employee with respect to a job function

Abstract

Fleet management is apprised of the effects of driver'"'"'s performance through the use of a driver performance index that is a relative calculation of how well a driver is operating equipment in which the driver performance index is tailorable to each organization so that the relative value of each element of the calculation can be weighted, with the driver performance index including metrics that indicate the way the vehicle is being operated whether before, during or after the operating period.

Claims

1. (canceled)

2. A method implementable on a computing device having a display for evaluating driver performance, comprising the steps of:

gathering as inputs driver related information and calculating a driver performance index based on the inputs;

wherein the driver performance index is also calculated based on at least;

a comparison between one of the inputs vs. ideal performance comprising values,

a job completion metric comprising completion accuracy, and

a job duration metric comprising a comparison to an ideal job duration and hours worked versus total hours of operation.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the calculating step includes providing the driver performance index based on an algebraic sum of the inputs.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the inputs are weighted.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index is based normalized to a fleet average.

12. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes an on-arrival time metric.

13. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes a driver attendance record metric.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the attendance record metric includes one of sick days or tardiness.

15. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes division of motor vehicle information.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the division of rooter vehicle information includes one of accidents or citations.

17. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes a complaints metric.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the complaints metric includes severity of a complaint.

19. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes a successful repair attempts metric.

20. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes a route negotiation metric.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the route negotiation metric includes traversing a route without cutting corners.

22. The method of claim 20, wherein the route negotiation metric includes excessive lane changes.

23. The method of claim 20, wherein the route negotiation metric includes how many times the driver enters restricted lanes.

24. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes an aggressive driving metric.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein the aggressive driving metric includes excessive lateral acceleration

26. The method of claim 24, wherein the aggressive driving metric includes hard braking.

27. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes how many times the driver disregards speed limits.

28. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes a metric related to seatbelt use.

29. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes an excessive RPM metric.

30. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes a weather metric.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein the weather metric includes ambient temperature.

32. The method of claim 30, wherein the weather metric includes barometric pressure.

33. The method of claim 30, wherein the weather metric includes taking into account degraded weather conditions.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein the degraded weather conditions are compared with nor, weather conditions.

35. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes the percent of time a vehicle is in operation.

36. The method of claim 2, wherein the driver performance index includes a fuel consumption metric.

37. The method of claim 3, the fuel consumption metric is associated with a trip.

39. The method of claim 2, wherein the inputs are summed such that an algebraic sum of the inputs includes an algebraic equation relating the inputs being weighted by significance.

40. The method of claim 2, wherein the inputs comprises fuel consumption, work percentage, excessive speed, hard acceleration, hard braking, evaluation of complaints from customers, the public and staff, information from regulatory agencies including agencies including accidents and citations, location dependent weather information including ambient temperature, barometric pressure and weather broadcast service information, and task performance information including ideal job duration and operator job duration.

6. (canceled)

7. (canceled)

8. (canceled)

9. (canceled)

10. (canceled)

11. (canceled)

38. (canceled)