METHODS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING STAND POPULATION, STAND CONSISTENCY AND STAND QUALITY IN AN AGRICULTURAL CROP AND ALERTING USERS

• US 20140089045A1
• Filed: 09/27/2012
• Published: 03/27/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 09/27/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Aglytix Inc.
• Original Assignee: Superior Edge, Inc.
• Inventors: Johnson, Jerome D.
• Application Number:
  US13/628,803
• Publication Number:
  US 20140089045A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.31
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0205 Location or geographical consideration
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/02 Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining

Abstract

A computer-based system for combining data related to stand population, consistency and quality in agricultural crops and dynamically analyzing the data whereby stand determinations based on that analysis during a crop growing season can be made. The system is programmed to alert a user (farmer) or other designated parties when the stand fails to meet user-defined parameters.

Claims

1. -34. (canceled)

35. A method comprising:

receiving, by a stand analyzer and alert generator (SAAG) executing on a computer device, data for a region of interest that includes growing crops, wherein the received data for the region of interest comprises at least one of field data, crop data, geographic data, and geologic data;

determining, by the SAAG and based on the received data for the region of interest, that a stand status of the growing crops within the region of interest reflects nonconformance with one or more parameters, wherein the stand status comprises at least one of a population status, a quality status, and a consistency status of the growing crops within the region of interest; and

outputting, by the SAAG and in response to determining that the stand status reflects nonconformance with the one or more parameters, at least one alert.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein the region of interest comprises a plurality of cells, and wherein determining that the stand status of the growing crops within the region of interest reflects nonconformance with the one or more parameters further comprises:

determining, by the SAAG, a stand score for at least one cell from the plurality of cells of the region of interest;

comparing, by the SAAG, the stand score for the at least one cell from the plurality of cells of the region of interest with the one or more parameters; and

determining, by the SAAG, that the stand score for the at least one cell from the plurality of cells of the region of interest does not satisfy at least one of the one or more parameters.

37. The method of claim 36, further comprising partitioning, by the SAAG, the region of interest to determine the plurality of cells.

38. The method of claim 36, wherein the at least one alert comprises an identifier of the at least one cell that does not satisfy the at least one of the one or more parameters.

39. The method of claim 35, wherein the one or more parameters comprise one or more first parameters, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest comprises receiving first data for the region of interest, and wherein outputting the at least one alert comprises outputting at least one first alert, the method further comprising:

receiving, by the SAAG, one or more second parameters, wherein at least one of the one or more second parameters is different from each of the one or more first parameters;

receiving, by the SAAG, second data for the region of interest, wherein the second data for the region of interest comprises at least one of field data, crop data, geographic data, and geologic data;

determining, by the SAAG and based on the received second data for the region of interest, that the stand status of the growing crops within the region of interest reflects nonconformance with one or more of the second parameters; and

outputting, by the SAAG and in response to determining that the stand status reflects nonconformance with the one or more second parameters, at least one second alert.

40. The method of claim 39, wherein the one or more first parameters represent one or more first target parameters for a first portion of a growing season, and wherein the one or more second parameters represent one or more second target parameters for a second portion of the growing season.

41. The method of claim 39, wherein receiving the one or more second parameters comprises receiving the one or more second parameters from a user interface communicatively coupled to the computer device.

42. The method of claim 35, wherein the at least one alert comprises one or more of a short messaging service (SMS) message, an email message, and a telephonic message.

43. The method of claim 35, wherein the at least one alert comprises an indication of a degree by which at least one of the population status, the quality status, and the consistency status of the growing crops within the region of interest deviates from the one or more parameters.

44. The method of claim 35, wherein the at least one alert comprises a recommendation for future action associated with the region of interest.

45. The method of claim 35, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest comprises receiving data for the region of interest collected from one or more sensors.

46. The method of claim 45, wherein the one or more sensors are carried by at least one of an aerial vehicle and a satellite.

47. The method of claim 45, wherein the one or more sensors comprise one or more field sensors.

48. The method of claim 45, wherein the one or more sensors comprise one or more remote sensors.

49. The method of claim 35, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest comprises receiving image data for the region of interest.

50. The method of claim 49, wherein the image data comprises at least one of crop color data, crop texture data, and crop pattern data.

51. The method of claim 35, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest comprises receiving the data for the region of interest from a database communicatively coupled to the computer device and configured to store at least one of the field data, the crop data, the geographic data, and the geologic data.

52. The method of claim 35, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest comprises receiving the data for the region of interest from a user interface communicatively coupled to the computer device.

53. The method of claim 35, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest comprises receiving field data that comprises at least one of field shape information, field location information, and historical crop yield information.

54. The method of claim 35, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest comprises receiving one or more of geographic data and geologic data that comprises at least one of soil attribute information, ground and surface water condition information, and manmade feature information.

55. The method of claim 35, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest further comprises receiving local knowledge data for the region of interest, wherein the local knowledge data comprises at least one of preferred crop production practices based upon past experience and site-specific knowledge associated with the region of interest.

56. The method of claim 55, wherein receiving the local knowledge data for the region of interest comprises receiving stand information for a field proximate the region of interest.

57. The method of claim 35, wherein receiving the data for the region of interest further comprises receiving at least one of historical and predicted weather data for the region of interest.

58. A system comprising:

a computer device comprising at least one processor; and

a stand analyzer and alert generator (SAAG) executable by the at least one processor of the computer device and configured to;

receive data for a region of interest that includes growing crops, wherein the received data for the region of interest comprises at least one of field data, crop data, geographic data, and geologic data;

determine, based on the received data for the region of interest, that a stand status of growing crops within the region of interest reflects nonconformance with one or more parameters, wherein the stand status comprises at least one of a population status, a quality status, and a consistency status of the growing crops within the region of interest; and

output, in response to determining that the stand status reflects nonconformance with the one or more parameters, at least one alert.

59. The system of claim 58, wherein the region of interest comprises a plurality of cells, and wherein the SAAG is further configured to determine that the stand status of the growing crops within the region of interest reflects the nonconformance with the one or more parameters by at least being configured to:

determine a stand score for at least one cell from the plurality of cells of the region of interest;

compare the stand score for the at least one cell from the plurality of cells of the region of interest with the one or more parameters; and

determine that the stand score for the at least one cell from the plurality of cells of the region of interest does not satisfy at least one of the one or more parameters.

60. The system of claim 59, wherein the SAAG is further configured to partition the region of interest to determine the plurality of cells.

61. The system of claim 59, wherein the at least one alert comprises an identifier of the at least one cell that does not satisfy the at least one of the one or more parameters.

62. The system of claim 59, wherein the at least one alert comprises a recommendation for remedial action to improve the crop stand and a graphical image of the cells in the region of interest where the remedial action is required.

63. The system of claim 58, wherein the one or more parameters comprise one or more first parameters, wherein the data for the region of interest comprises first data for the region of interest, wherein the at least one alert comprises at least one first alert, and wherein the SAAG is further configured to:

receive one or more second parameters, wherein at least one of the one or more second parameters is different from each of the one or more first parameters;

receive second data for the region of interest, wherein the second data for the region of interest comprises at least one of field data, crop data, geographic data, and geologic data;

determine, based on the received second data for the region of interest, that the stand status of the growing crops within the region of interest reflects nonconformance with one or more of the second parameters; and

output, in response to determining that the stand status reflects nonconformance with the one or more second parameters, at least one second alert.

64. The system of claim 63, wherein the one or more first parameters represent one or more first target parameters for a first portion of a growing season, and wherein the one or more second parameters represent one or more second target parameters for a second portion of the growing season.

65. The system of claim 63, further comprising a user interface executable by the at least one processor and communicatively coupled to SAAG, wherein the SAAG is configured to receive the one or more second parameters by at least being configured to receive the one or more second parameters from the user interface.

66. The system of claim 58, wherein the at least one alert comprises one or more of a short messaging service (SMS) message, an email message, and a telephonic message.

67. The system of claim 58, wherein the at least one alert comprises an indication of a degree by which at least one of the population status, the quality status, and the consistency status of the growing crops within the region of interest deviates from the one or more parameters.

68. The system of claim 58, wherein the SAAG is configured to receive the data for the region of interest by at least being configured to receive data for the region of interest collected from one or more sensors.

69. The system of claim 68, wherein the one or more sensors are carried by at least one of an aerial vehicle and a satellite.

70. The system of claim 68, wherein the one or more sensors comprise one or more field sensors.

71. The system of claim 68, wherein the one or more sensors comprise one or more remote sensors.

72. The system of claim 58, wherein the SAAG is configured to receive the data for the region of interest by at least being configured to receive image data for the region of interest, wherein the image data comprises at least one of crop color data, crop texture data, and crop pattern data.

73. The system of claim 58, further comprising a database communicatively coupled to the computer device and configured to store at least one of the field data, the crop data, the geographic data, and the geologic data, wherein the SAAG is configured to receive the data for the region of interest by at least being configured to receive the data for the region of interest from the database.

74. The system of claim 58, further comprising a user interface executable by the at least one processor and communicatively coupled to SAAG, wherein the SAAG is configured to receive the data for the region of interest by at least being configured to receive the data for the region of interest from the user interface.

75. The system of claim 58, wherein the received data for the region of interest comprises field data that comprises at least one of field shape information, field location information, and historical crop yield information.

76. The system of claim 58, wherein the received data for the region of interest comprises one or more of geographic data and geologic data that comprises at least one of soil attribute information, ground and surface water condition information, and manmade feature information.

77. The system of claim 58, wherein the SAAG is configured to receive the data for the region of interest by at least being configured to receive local knowledge data for the region of interest, wherein the local knowledge data comprises at least one of preferred crop production practices based upon past experience and site-specific knowledge associated with the region of interest.

78. The system of claim 58, wherein the SAAG is configured to receive the local knowledge data for the region of interest by at least being configured to receive local knowledge data comprising stand information for a field proximate the region of interest.

79. The system of claim 58, wherein the SAAG is configured to receive the data for the region of interest by at least being configured to receive at least one of historical and predicted weather data for the region of interest.