METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING GRANTS

• US 20140095270A1
• Filed: 03/15/2013
• Published: 04/03/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 09/28/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: StreamLink Software, Inc.
• Original Assignee: StreamLink Software, Inc.
• Inventors: Roth, Adam
• Application Number:
  US13/832,402
• Publication Number:
  US 20140095270A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.39
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06393 Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis

Abstract

A system and method for managing grants is provided. A method includes multiple entities associated with a grant, each having an instance of a grant management application. Each instance of the grant management application includes the capability to receive disparate fiscal, human resource, and program data associated with the grant, and to compare the combined data to a goal of the grant to determine the entity'"'"'s performance to the goal. The combination of instances of the grant management application allows for a complete roll-up of individual entity'"'"'s performance into a total performance for the funder of the grant and according to the funder'"'"'s specifications.

Claims

1. A method for managing grants, comprising:

at least one instance of a grant management application, wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application comprises;

receiving at least two of fiscal data associated with at least one grant, human resource data associated with the at least one grant, and program data associated with the at least one grant;

comparing at least one of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data to at least one goal of the at least one grant;

determining performance associated with the at least one goal; and

reporting the performance.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

integrating data from at least two of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data, wherein the at least two of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data are of disparate data type.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

integrating data from at least two of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data, wherein the at least two of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data are from disparate data sources.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one grant comprises a plurality of grants and the at least one goal comprises a plurality of goals.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application comprises a plurality of instances of the grant management application, and wherein at least two of the plurality of instances of the grant management application cooperate with each other to exchange data.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein at least one instance of the grant management application receives at least one of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data from at least one other instance of the grant management application.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the at least one other instance of the grant management application includes a plurality of other instances of the grant management application, and wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

combining at least one of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data from at least two of the plurality of other instances of the grant management application.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein determining the performance is based at least in part on data received from the plurality of other instances of the grant management application.

9. The method of claim 5, wherein at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

receiving performance data associated with the at least one goal from at least one other instance of the grant management application.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the at least one other instance of the grant management application includes a plurality of other instances of the grant management application, and wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

combining performance data from at least two of the plurality of other instances of the grant management application.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the performance is based at least in part on performance data received from the plurality of other instances of the grant management application.

12. The method of claim 5, wherein a plurality of recipients are associated with the plurality of instances of the grant management application, and wherein at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

determining a measure of recipient performance based at least in part on data received from the plurality of instances of the grant management application associated with the plurality of recipients.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one goal comprises a plurality of goals, and wherein at least two of the plurality of goals are of disparate goal type.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one goal comprises at least one of an objective goal, a unit goal, and a benchmark goal.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein reporting the performance comprises reporting in accordance with predefined requirements of the at least one grant.

16. A method for managing grants, comprising:

at least one instance of a grant management application, wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application comprises;

receiving source data associated with at least one grant from at least one data source;

identifying program data associated with at least one goal of the at least one grant from the source data;

comparing the identified program data to the at least one goal;

determining performance associated with the at least one goal; and

reporting the performance.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein identifying program data comprises extracting the program data from the source data according to at least one predefined data schema.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein comparing the identified program data to the at least one goal comprises subjecting the identified program data to at least one predefined rule associated with the at least one goal to isolate program data meeting at least one criteria associated with the at least one goal.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein determining the performance comprises calculating a measure of performance based at least in part on the isolated program data.

20. The method of claim 16, further comprising comparing the performance to a predefined target associated with the at least one goal.

21. The method of claim 16, wherein the grant management application further comprises:

integrating the program data with at least one of fiscal data and human resource data from the data source.

22. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one data source is a plurality of data sources, and wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

integrating data from at least two of the plurality of data sources, wherein the source data from the at least two data sources are of disparate data type.

23. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one data source is a plurality of data sources, and wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

integrating data from at least two of the plurality of data sources, wherein the source data from the at least two data sources are from disparate data sources.

24. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one grant comprises a plurality of grants and the at least one goal comprises a plurality of goals.

25. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application comprises a plurality of instances of the grant management application, and wherein at least two of the plurality of instances of the grant management application cooperate with each other to exchange data.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein at least one instance of the grant management application receives program data from at least one other instance of the grant management application.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the at least one other instance of the grant management application includes a plurality of other instances of the grant management application, and wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

combining program data from at least two of the plurality of other instances of the grant management application.

28. The method of claim 27, wherein determining the performance is based at least in part on program data received from the plurality of other instances of the grant management application.

29. The method of claim 25, wherein at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

receiving performance data associated with the at least one goal from at least one other instance of the grant management application.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the at least one other instance of the grant management application includes a plurality of other instances of the grant management application, and wherein the at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

combining performance data from at least two of the plurality of other instances of the grant management application.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein determining the performance is based at least in part on performance data received from the plurality of other instances of the grant management application.

32. The method of claim 25, wherein a plurality of recipients are associated with the plurality of instances of the grant management application, and wherein at least one instance of the grant management application further comprises:

determining a measure of recipient performance based at least in part on data received from the plurality of instances of the grant management application associated with the plurality of recipients.

33. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one goal comprises a plurality of goals, and wherein at least two of the plurality of goals are of disparate goal type.

34. The method of claim 16, wherein the at least one goal comprises at least one of an objective goal, a unit goal, and a benchmark goal.

35. The method of claim 16, wherein reporting the performance comprises reporting in accordance with predefined requirements of the at least one grant.

36. A system for managing grants, comprising:

a computer system, comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory comprises a grant management application, and wherein the grant management application comprises logic for;

receiving at least two of fiscal data associated with at least one grant, human resource data associated with the at least one grant, and program data associated with the at least one grant;

comparing at least one of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data to at least one goal of the at least one grant;

determining performance associated with the at least one goal; and

reporting the performance.

37. A system for managing grants, comprising:

a computer system, comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory comprises a grant management application, and wherein the grant management application comprises logic for;

receiving source data associated with at least one grant from at least one data source;

identifying program data associated with at least one goal of the at least one grant from the source data;

comparing the identified program data to the at least one goal;

determining performance associated with the at least one goal; and

reporting the performance.

38. A system for managing grants, comprising:

means for receiving at least two of fiscal data associated with at least one grant, human resource data associated with the at least one grant, and program data associated with the at least one grant;

means for comparing at least one of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data to at least one goal of the at least one grant;

means for determining performance associated with the at least one goal; and

means for reporting the performance.

39. A system for managing grants, comprising:

means for receiving source data associated with at least one grant from at least one data source;

means for identifying program data associated with at least one goal of the at least one grant from the source data;

means for comparing the identified program data to the at least one goal;

means for determining performance associated with the at least one goal; and

means for reporting the performance.

40. A computer readable medium comprising a grant management application, wherein the grant management application comprises logic for:

receiving at least two of fiscal data associated with at least one grant, human resource data associated with the at least one grant, and program data associated with the at least one grant;

comparing at least one of the fiscal data, the human resource data, and the program data to at least one goal of the at least one grant;

determining performance associated with the at least one goal; and

reporting the performance.

41. A computer readable medium comprising a grant management application, wherein the grant management application comprises logic for:

receiving source data associated with at least one grant from at least one data source;

identifying program data associated with at least one goal of the at least one grant from the source data;

comparing the identified program data to the at least one goal;

determining performance associated with the at least one goal; and

reporting the performance.