GAMES FOR EVALUATING FINANCIAL FORECASTING SKILL

• US 20140106836A1
• Filed: 10/11/2013
• Published: 04/17/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 10/12/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Nous Global Limited
• Original Assignee: Nous Global Limited
• Inventors: Short, Justin, Braylan, Alexander, Xu, Xiaofeng, Lenaghan, Anthony, Yau, Ming Hiu
• Application Number:
  US14/051,714
• Publication Number:
  US 20140106836A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 463/9
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/335 using Internet
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/80 Special adaptations for executing a specific game genre or game mode
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 19/18 Book-keeping or economics

Abstract

A computer-implemented game system enables users to simulate the trading of financial instruments in a financial market. Among other things, the system simulates the purchasing of a financial instrument, the specification of conditions for holding or selling the financial instrument, and the selling of a financial instrument to realize simulated gains and losses. The performance of each user is tracked and displayed, such that users can compare their performance against other users. The performance of each user is used to determine a payout for that user.

Claims

1. A system for playing a game comprising:

an input module that receives a strategy from a player, the strategy comprising at least one trigger condition;

a trigger module that determines if the trigger condition has been met; and

an adjustment module that calculates a skill adjustment value based on the strategy and adjusts a skill level for the player based on the skill adjustment value.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the strategy further comprises a confidence value.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the strategy corresponds to a simulated financial transaction.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the strategy corresponds to a plurality of simulated financial transactions and the trigger condition corresponds to a condition to counteract the simulated financial transactions.

5. The system of claim 3, wherein the trigger condition corresponds to a condition to counteract the simulated financial transaction.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the input module receives a plurality of strategies from a plurality of players, each strategy comprising at least one respective trigger condition;

wherein the trigger module determines if each of the trigger conditions has been met; and

wherein the adjustment module calculates a respective skill adjustment value for each of the strategies and adjusts the skill level for each player based on the corresponding skill adjustment value.

7. The system of claim 6, further comprising a leaderboard module that determines a leaderboard corresponding to the skill levels of the players.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the adjustment module calculates the skill adjustment value based on a determination of a simulated valuation change of a financial instrument.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the simulated valuation change corresponds to a difference in valuation between a simulated position entry time and a simulated position exit time.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the simulated valuation change corresponds to a logarithm of a difference in valuation between a simulated position entry time and a simulated position exit time.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein the adjustment module calculates the skill adjustment value further based on a current skill level of the player.

12. The system of claim 1, wherein the adjustment module calculates the skill adjustment value further based on a simulated market liquidity of specific financial instruments used by the strategy.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the adjustment module calculates the skill adjustment value further based on a type of the strategy.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein the adjustment module calculates the skill adjustment value further based on an entry cost value corresponding to a simulated transaction cost estimate.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the adjustment module calculates the skill adjustment value further based on a bonus value corresponding to a difference between the simulated transaction cost estimate and a simulated actual transaction cost.

16. The system of claim 2, wherein the skill adjustment value is a multiple of the confidence value.

17. The system of claim 1, further comprises a registration module that that records identifying information corresponding to one or more players.

18. The system of claim 12, wherein the identifying information comprises a telephone number.

19. The system of claim 13, wherein the registration module sends a message comprising a confirmation code to a device associated with the telephone number.

20. The system of claim 14, wherein the registration module verifies the identifying information by receiving the confirmation code from the device associated with the telephone number.

21. The system of claim 7, wherein the leaderboard module determines an award and a recipient of the award based on the skill levels of the players.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the leaderboard module determines the award and the receipt of the award based on a threshold skill value.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein players with skill levels greater than the threshold skill value each receive corresponding weighted portions of the award, and wherein players with a skill level less than the threshold value do not receive the award.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the weighted portions of the award depend on the players'"'"' skill levels.

25. The system of claim 7, wherein the leaderboard module determines the award further based on the number of players.

26. The system of claim 7, wherein the leaderboard module determines the award and the recipient of the award further based on changes to the skill levels of the players during a pre-determined time period.

27. The system of claim 7, wherein the leaderboard module determines a plurality of awards and a plurality of recipients of the awards further based on changes to the skill levels of the players during each of a plurality of pre-determined overlapping time periods.

28. A computer-implemented method of playing a game, the method comprising:

receiving, in an input module a strategy from a player, the strategy comprising at least one trigger condition;

determining, using a trigger module, if the trigger condition has been met;

calculating, using an adjustment module, a skill adjustment value based on the strategy;

adjusting, using the adjustment module, a skill level for the player based on the skill adjustment value; and

displaying information regarding the skill adjustment value to the player through a user interface.

29. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein the strategy further comprises a confidence value.

30. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein the strategy corresponds to a simulated financial transaction.

31. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein the strategy corresponds to a plurality of simulated financial transactions and the trigger condition corresponds to a condition to counteract the simulated financial transactions.

32. The computer-implemented method of claim 30, wherein the trigger condition corresponds to a condition to counteract the simulated financial transaction.

33. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, further comprising:

receiving, in the input module, a plurality of strategies from a plurality of players, each strategy comprising at least one respective trigger condition;

determining, using the trigger module, if each of the trigger conditions has been met;

calculating, using the adjustment module, a respective skill adjustment value for each of the strategies; and

adjusting, using the adjustment module, the skill level for each player based on the corresponding skill adjustment value.

34. The computer-implemented method of claim 33, further comprising determining, using a leaderboard module, a leaderboard corresponding to the skill levels of the players.

35. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein calculating the skill adjustment value comprises determining, using the adjustment module, a simulated valuation change of a financial instrument.

36. The computer-implemented method of claim 35, wherein the simulated valuation change corresponds to a difference in valuation between a simulated position entry time and a simulated position exit time.

37. The computer-implemented method of claim 35, wherein the simulated valuation change corresponds to a logarithm of a difference in valuation between a simulated position entry time and a simulated position exit time.

38. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein the skill adjustment value calculation is further based on a current skill level of the player.

39. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein the skill adjustment value calculation is further based on a simulated market liquidity of specific financial instruments used by the strategy.

40. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein the skill adjustment value calculation is further based on a type of the strategy.

41. The computer-implemented method of claim 28, wherein the skill adjustment value calculation is further based on an entry cost value corresponding to a simulated transaction cost.

42. The computer-implemented method of claim 41, wherein the skill adjustment value calculation is further based on a bonus value corresponding to a difference between the simulated transaction cost estimate and a simulated actual transaction cost.

43. The computer-implemented method of claim 29, wherein the skill adjustment value is a multiple of the confidence value.

44. The computer-implemented method of claim 34, further comprising determining, using the leaderboard module, an award and a recipient of the award based on the skill levels of the players.

45. The computer-implemented method of claim 39, wherein determining the award and the recipient of the award is further based on a threshold skill value.

46. The computer-implemented method of claim 40, wherein players with skill levels greater than the threshold skill value each receive corresponding weighted portions of the award, and wherein players with a skill level less the threshold value do not receive the award.

47. The computer-implemented method of claim 41, wherein the weighted portions of the award depend on the players'"'"' skill levels.

48. The computer-implemented method of claim 41, wherein determining the award is further based on the number of players.

49. The computer-implemented method of claim 34, wherein determining the award and the recipient of the award is further based on changes to the skill levels of the players during a pre-determined time period.

50. The computer-implemented method of claim 34, further comprising determining, using the leaderboard module, a plurality of awards and a plurality of recipients of the awards further based on changes to the skill levels of the players during each of a plurality of pre-determined overlapping time periods.