RULES ENGINE AS A PLATFORM FOR MOBILE APPLICATIONS

• US 20140122378A1
• Filed: 03/15/2013
• Published: 05/01/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 10/29/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Qualcomm, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Qualcomm, Inc.
• Inventors: SWAMINATHAN, Ashwin, Ding, Li, Patton, Evan, Dolter, James William, Nanda, Sanjiv, Kuhn, Lucas Daniel, Akula, Muralidhar R.
• Application Number:
  US13/834,987
• Publication Number:
  US 20140122378A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 706/11
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 20/00 Machine learning
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 5/02 Knowledge representation; Symbolic representation

Abstract

Disclosed are systems and methods for providing a rules engine as a platform within a portable electronic device. In one embodiment, a rules engine platform is provided within a portable electronic device by receiving a plurality of rules for one or more modules of the portable electronic device. Additionally, the rules engine platform can receive one or more samples from one or more of the modules within the portable electronic device. The rules engine platform identifies and evaluates one or more relevant rules based on the received sample. The rules engine platform can then determine an action to provide to other modules of the portable electronic device. The rules engine platform may be configured to optimize the performance and power consumption of the portable electronic device.

Claims

1. A method for providing a rules engine as a platform in a portable electronic device having a plurality of modules, comprising:

receiving, in a rules engine platform, a plurality of rules;

asserting a fact based on one of a received sample and an expected sample from a sampling module included in the plurality of modules;

identifying a relevant rule included in the plurality of rules using the asserted fact;

evaluating the relevant rule; and

determining an action from the evaluation of the relevant rule.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein asserting the fact comprises:

storing the fact in a knowledge repository in the portable electronic device.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

storing the plurality of rules in a rules repository in the portable electronic device.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein asserting the fact is further based on one of a second sample that is received from a second sampling module and a second fact.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the action is determined to be one of a null value and a response to do nothing.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

sending the determined action to a reception module included in the plurality of modules; and

adapting the determined action for reception by the reception module.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the sampling module and the reception module are the same module.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining a sampling requirement of the relevant rule;

computing an optimization scheme based on the sampling requirement of the relevant rule; and

modifying a sampling rate of the sampling module based on the optimization scheme.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein modifying the sampling rate comprises:

providing the sampling rate to the sampling module.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the rules engine comprises an interface including one of an application programming interface (API), inter-process communication interface, and a dynamic link library (DLL) that allows the sampling module to send data to the rules engine.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining a plurality of sampling requirements of the plurality of rules;

computing an optimization scheme based on the plurality of sampling requirements of the plurality of rules; and

modifying a sampling rate of the sampling module based on the optimization scheme.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein computing the optimization scheme comprises:

evaluating the plurality of sampling requirements;

determining, from the evaluation, that a first sampling requirement of a first rule requires samples from the sampling module at a first rate and a second sampling requirement of a second rule requires the samples from the sampling module at a second rate that is different from the first rate; and

computing an optimization parameter that specifies an optimal sampling rate of the sampling module that is satisfactory for the first rule and the second rule.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising:

receiving a first sample from a second module;

updating the optimization scheme in response to the first sample received from the second module; and

modifying the sampling rate of the sampling module based on the updated optimization scheme.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

storing information related to one of the relevant rule, the sampling module, a sample received from the sampling module, and a reception module; and

determining provenance information from the stored information.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

presenting the provenance information on a display of the portable electronic device.

16. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

asserting a second fact based on the determined action;

identifying a second rule included in the plurality of rules using the second fact;

evaluating the second rule; and

determining a second action from the evaluation of the second rule.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the fact includes a context of interest.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the received sample is a Wi-Fi signature and asserting the fact comprises:

receiving a second sample comprising a calendar event that indicates a meeting time and a meeting location; and

asserting the fact where a current time coincides with the meeting time and the Wi-Fi signature indicates that the portable electronic device is at the meeting location, wherein the asserted fact indicates that a user of the portable electronic device is in a meeting.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the action is determined to disable all audio output based on the evaluation of the relevant rule for the asserted fact indicating that the user is in a meeting.

20. A portable electronic device, comprising:

a plurality of modules, including at least one sampling module configured to send a sample associated with the sampling module; and

a processor operable to execute a rules engine platform including a rules repository configured to store a plurality of rules, and a rules engine configured to assert a fact based on the sample, determine an action by evaluating a relevant rule from the rules repository using the fact, and send the determined action.

21. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the processor is further configured to execute a respective module of the plurality of modules.

22. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the rules engine platform further includes a knowledge repository to store the asserted fact.

23. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the rules engine is further configured to select the relevant rule from the rules repository.

24. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the rules engine platform further includes a rules engine interface configured to receive the sample from the sampling module and provide the sample to the rules engine, and further configured to receive the determined action from the rules engine.

25. The portable electronic device of claim 24, wherein the rules engine is configured to determine a plurality of actions by evaluating the relevant rule, and further wherein the rules engine interface is configured to send the plurality of determined actions provided by the rules engine to a plurality of reception modules such that a respective reception module receives a respective action adapted for the respective reception module.

26. The portable electronic device of claim 24, wherein the rules engine interface is configured to send the determined action provided by the rules engine to a plurality of reception modules.

27. The portable electronic device of claim 24, wherein the rules engine interface is configured to send the determined action provided by the rules engine, and further wherein the plurality of modules includes a reception module configured to receive the determined action from the rules engine interface.

28. The portable electronic device of claim 27 wherein the rules engine is further configured to determine provenance information for the determined action, wherein the provenance information comprises one of the relevant rule, the sample, the sampling module, and the reception module.

29. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the rules engine is further configured to assert a second fact from the determined action, to identify a second rule based on the asserted second fact, to evaluate the second rule, and to determine a second action based on the evaluation of the second rule.

30. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the rules repository is further configured to receive an update to a stored rule base.

31. The portable electronic device of claim 30, wherein the rules engine platform further includes a rules translator configured to translate the update to the stored rule base.

32. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the rules engine is configured to assert the fact further based on one of a second sample and a stored fact.

33. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the sampling module is one of an accelerometer, a cellular module, a Bluetooth module, a Wi-Fi module, a microphone, a camera module, a user input module, a near-field communication module, a satellite positioning system module, a magnetometer, an inertial sensor, a relative humidity sensor, a display module, or an application module stored in memory of the portable electronic device.

34. The portable electronic device of claim 20, wherein the rules engine platform is further configured to determine a plurality of sampling requirements of the plurality of rules;

to compute an optimization scheme based on the plurality of sampling requirements of the plurality of rules; and

to modify a sampling rate of the sampling module based on the optimization scheme.

35. The portable electronic device of claim 34, wherein the configuration of the rules engine to compute the optimization scheme based on the plurality of sampling requirements includes the rules engine being configured to at least:

evaluate the plurality of sampling requirements;

determine, from the evaluation, that a first sampling requirement of a first rule requires samples from the sampling module at a first rate and a second sampling requirement of a second rule requires the samples from the sampling module at a second rate that is different from the first rate; and

compute an optimization parameter that specifies an optimal sampling rate of the sampling module that is satisfactory for the first rule and the second rule.

36. The portable electronic device of claim 34, wherein the rules engine platform is further configured to receive a first sample from a second module;

update the optimization scheme in response to the first sample received from the second module; and

to modify the sampling rate of the sampling module based on the updated optimization scheme.

37. A portable electronic device, comprising:

means for storing a plurality of rules in a rules repository;

means for subscribing to a plurality of modules configured to send a plurality of samples;

means for asserting a plurality of facts based on the subscribing means; and

means for determining an action for a first module of the plurality of modules by identifying a relevant rule of the plurality of rules based on the asserting means and evaluating the relevant rule.

38. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored therein, which when executed by a portable electronic device, cause the portable electronic device to perform a method, the method comprising:

receiving a plurality of rules;

asserting a fact based on a sample that is to be received from a sampling module included in a plurality of modules;

identifying a relevant rule included in the plurality of rules using the asserted fact;

evaluating the relevant rule; and

determining an action from the evaluation of the relevant rule.