EVOKED RESPONSE TESTING SYSTEM FOR NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS
First Claim
1. A method of using an Evoked Response Potential (ERP) testing system to administer a test on a test subject, wherein the ERP testing system comprises a headset and a control module, the method comprising:
- (a) positioning the headset on the head of the test subject, wherein the headset comprises;
(i) a signal electrode,(ii) a reference electrode, and(iii) a stimulus producer;
(b) providing the test subject with access to one or more buttons on the control module, wherein the control module further comprises;
(i) a memory, wherein the memory stores a plurality of evoked response testing protocols including instructions for the stimulus producer, and(ii) a controller operably configured to actuate one of the plurality of evoked response testing protocols stored in the memory, wherein the controller is further configured to communicate a plurality of control administration parameters to the headset for performing an evoked response test;
(c) executing a selected one of the stored evoked response testing protocols though the headset via the controller;
(d) receiving manual inputs from the test subject via the one or more buttons on the control module; and
(e) recording data in the memory based on the manual inputs received from the test subject.
0 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
A dyslexia screening system suitable for clinical use includes an integrated headset that efficiently and conveniently performs an auditory evoked response (ERP) test by positioning electrodes about the ears of the subject. An integral control module automatically performs the test, providing simplified controls and indications to the clinician. A number of screening tests that are stored in the headset are periodically uploaded for billing, remote analysis and result reporting. A paradigm that characterizes testing performed for a subject along with the patient identification and/or patient demographics are stored in an associated fashion for later fusion and analyses with similar but not necessarily identically constructed ERP tests.
-
Citations
20 Claims
-
1. A method of using an Evoked Response Potential (ERP) testing system to administer a test on a test subject, wherein the ERP testing system comprises a headset and a control module, the method comprising:
-
(a) positioning the headset on the head of the test subject, wherein the headset comprises; (i) a signal electrode, (ii) a reference electrode, and (iii) a stimulus producer; (b) providing the test subject with access to one or more buttons on the control module, wherein the control module further comprises; (i) a memory, wherein the memory stores a plurality of evoked response testing protocols including instructions for the stimulus producer, and (ii) a controller operably configured to actuate one of the plurality of evoked response testing protocols stored in the memory, wherein the controller is further configured to communicate a plurality of control administration parameters to the headset for performing an evoked response test; (c) executing a selected one of the stored evoked response testing protocols though the headset via the controller; (d) receiving manual inputs from the test subject via the one or more buttons on the control module; and (e) recording data in the memory based on the manual inputs received from the test subject. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18)
-
-
19. A method of using an Evoked Response Potential (ERP) testing system to administer a test on a test subject, wherein the ERP testing system comprises a headset and a control module, the method comprising:
-
(a) positioning the headset on the head of the test subject, wherein the headset comprises; (i) a signal electrode, (ii) a reference electrode, and (iii) a stimulus producer; (b) placing a handheld control module in a hand of the test subject, wherein the control module further comprises; (i) a memory, wherein the memory stores a plurality of evoked response testing protocols including instructions for the stimulus producer, and (ii) a controller operably configured to actuate one of the plurality of evoked response testing protocols stored in the memory, wherein the controller is further configured to communicate a plurality of control administration parameters to the headset for performing an evoked response test; (c) performing an ERP test, wherein the act of performing an ERP test comprises executing a selected one of the stored evoked response testing protocols though the headset via the controller; (d) receiving results of the ERP test, wherein the act of receiving results of the ERP test comprises receiving manual inputs from the test subject via the one or more buttons on the control module; and (e) recording the ERP test results in the memory.
-
-
20. A method of using an Evoked Response Potential (ERP) testing system to administer a test on a human child, wherein the ERP testing system comprises a headset and a control module, the method comprising:
-
(a) positioning the headset on the head of the child, wherein the headset comprises; (i) a signal electrode, (ii) a reference electrode, and (iii) a stimulus producer; (b) placing a handheld control module in a hand of the child, wherein the control module further comprises; (i) a memory, wherein the memory stores a plurality of evoked response testing protocols including instructions for the stimulus producer, and p2 (ii) a controller operably configured to actuate one of the plurality of evoked response testing protocols stored in the memory, wherein the controller is further configured to communicate a plurality of control administration parameters to the headset for performing an evoked response test; (c) performing an ERP test, wherein the act of performing an ERP test comprises executing a selected one of the stored evoked response testing protocols though the headset via the controller; (d) receiving results of the ERP test, wherein the act of receiving results of the ERP test comprises receiving manual inputs from the child via the one or more buttons on the control module during the act of performing an ERP test; and (e) recording the ERP test results in the memory.
-
Specification