ANALYZING HARDWARE DESIGNS BASED ON COMPONENT RE-USE

• US 20140136152A1
• Filed: 11/13/2012
• Published: 05/15/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 11/13/2012
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Chidiac, Ghassan, Le Floc'h, Alain R., Torella, Joseph H., Mitchell, Mary A.
• Application Number:
  US13/675,647
• Publication Number:
  US 20140136152A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 703/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/00 Computer-aided design [CAD]
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/13 Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0875 Itemisation or classification of parts, supplies or services, e.g. bill of materials

Abstract

Analyzing a design of a hardware device includes obtaining a computer-aided design assembly depicting the design and automatically creating a bill of materials based on the computer-aided design assembly, wherein the bill of materials lists in a hierarchical manner a plurality of components making up the design. In another embodiment, analyzing a design of a hardware device includes automatically creating a bill of materials based on a computer-aided design assembly depicting the design and automatically updating the bill of materials to include business and technical information retrieved from a database, wherein the automatically updating results in an updated bill of materials.

Claims

1. A method for analyzing a design of a hardware device, the method comprising:

obtaining a computer-aided design assembly depicting the design; and

automatically creating a bill of materials based on the computer-aided design assembly, wherein the bill of materials lists in a hierarchical manner a plurality of components making up the design.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the automatically creating the bill of materials comprises:

querying a structure of the design from a tool in which the computer-aided design assembly was created; and

constructing an assembly listing from the structure, wherein the assembly listing groups the plurality of components according to respective levels of the plurality of components in a hierarchy of the design.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the assembly listing indicates, for each of the plurality of components, at least one of:

a component type, a quantity, or a computer-aided design attribute.

4. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

querying a database for business and technical information related to the plurality of components; and

automatically updating the bill of materials to include the business and technical information, wherein the automatically updating results in an updated bill of materials.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the business and technical information indicates a supplier of at least one of plurality of components.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the business and technical information indicates a part number of at least one of plurality of components.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein the business and technical information indicates a cost of at least one of plurality of components.

8. The method of claim 4, wherein the business and technical information indicates a compliance of at least one of plurality of components.

9. The method of claim 4, wherein the business and technical information indicates an availability of at least one of plurality of components.

10. The method of claim 4, wherein the automatically updating further comprises:

automatically validating an inclusion of the plurality of components in the design.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the automatically validating comprises, for a given one of the plurality of components:

confirming inclusion of the given one of the plurality of components in the design, when the business and technical information indicates that the given one of the plurality of components is an optimal choice for inclusion in the design; and

rejecting inclusion of the given one of the plurality of components in the design, when the business and technical information indicates that the given one of the plurality of components is not an optimal choice for inclusion in the design.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the rejecting further comprises:

identifying an alternate component to be used in place of the given one of the plurality of components in the design.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising:

outputting the updated bill of materials for review by a human user.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

outputting the bill of materials for review by a human user.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the plurality of components is a pre-existing component that is re-used in the design.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the bill of materials is constructed as a spreadsheet.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the design includes a modification to a previously analyzed design of the hardware device.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of components is one of:

an assembly, a sub-assembly, or a part.

19. A method for analyzing a design of a hardware device, the method comprising:

automatically creating a bill of materials based on a computer-aided design assembly depicting the design; and

automatically updating the bill of materials to include business and technical information retrieved from a database, wherein the automatically updating results in an updated bill of materials.

20. A method for analyzing a design of a hardware device, the method comprising:

obtaining a computer-aided design assembly depicting the design;

automatically creating a bill of materials based on the computer-aided design assembly;

retrieving business and technical information from a database, wherein the business and technical information relates to the plurality of components;

analyzing an inclusion of a given one of the plurality of components in the design;

automatically confirming the inclusion of the given one of the plurality of components in the design, when the business and technical information indicates that the given one of the plurality of components is an optimal choice for inclusion in the design;

automatically rejecting the inclusion of the given one of the plurality of components in the design, when the business and technical information indicates that the given one of the plurality of components is not an optimal choice for inclusion in the design; and

automatically updating the bill of materials to indicate the automatically confirming or the automatically rejecting.