Project Management System

• US 20140143000A1
• Filed: 02/29/2012
• Published: 05/22/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 03/01/2011
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Steeve Teong Sin Kay
• Original Assignee: Steeve Teong Sin Kay
• Inventors: Kay, Steeve Teong Sin
• Application Number:
  US14/002,271
• Publication Number:
  US 20140143000A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7.14
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063118 Staff planning in a project environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/103 Workflow collaboration or project management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/105 Human resources

Abstract

A project management system is described, including (i) a people database storing profiles of individuals; (ii) a project processor configured to: display a project template on a graphical user interface for an initial project; enter parameter values into fields of the project template based on inputs from a user; identify individuals to work on the initial project by comparing the profiles of the individuals stored in the people database with the parameter values in the project template; modify the performance evaluation of an individual based on feedback from at least one of realized outcomes; modify at least one of the expected outcomes based on feedback from at least one of the profiles; modify at least one of the expected outcomes based on feedback from at least one of the realized outcomes; and display at least one of the parameter values entered into the project template on the graphical user interface.

Claims

1-43. -43. (canceled)

44. A project management system comprising:

(i) a people database storing profiles of individuals, wherein the profile for each individual comprises indicators for;

an employment history of the individual;

a work position held by the individual;

a type of work performed by the individual;

a skill level of the individual;

an evaluation of performance by the individual on any project, or portion thereof, completed by the individual; and

an availability of the individual for a project;

(ii) a project database storing information about projects, wherein the information for each project comprises indicators for;

(a) information on persons needed to complete the project, wherein the information on each person includes at least one of;

a type of work to be performed by the person;

a required skill level of the person; and

an amount of time for the person to perform on the project;

(b) expected outcomes of the project;

(c) realized outcomes of the project, after they are realized; and

(d) a cost of at least a portion of the project;

(iii) a project processor configured to;

identify individuals to work on a project by comparing the profiles of the individuals stored in the people database with the information for the project stored in the project database;

modify the performance evaluation based on feedback from at least one of the realized outcomes in relation to at least one of the expected outcomes;

modify at least one of the expected outcomes based on feedback from at least one of the profiles; and

modify at least one of the expected outcomes based on feedback from at least one of the realized outcomes.

45. The system of claim 44, further comprising a knowledge database having:

(a) first rules that determine how the feedback from the at least one of the realized outcomes in relation to the at least one of the expected outcomes modifies the performance evaluation;

(b) second rules that determine how the feedback from the at least one of the profiles modifies the at least one of the expected outcomes; and

(c) third rules that determine how the feedback from the at least one of the realized outcomes modifies the at least one of the expected outcomes.

46. The system of claim 45, wherein feedback based on at least one of the realized outcomes modifies at least one of the first rules, the second rules, and the third rules.

47. The system of claim 45, wherein feedback based on a relation between at least one of the realized outcomes and at least one of the expected outcomes modifies at least one of the first rules, the second rules, and the third rules.

48. The system of claim 44, wherein at least one of the expected outcomes comprises a cost of at least a portion of the project.

49. The system of claim 44, wherein at least one of the expected outcomes comprises a time to completion of at least a portion of the project.

50. The system of claim 45, wherein the at least one of the realized outcomes comprises an actual time to completion of a portion of a project and the at least one of the expected outcomes comprises an expected time to completion of the portion of the project.

51. The system of claim 50, wherein the first rules comprises a performance rule that increases a performance evaluation value of an individual when the actual time to completion occurs before the expected time to completion, and decreases the performance evaluation value of the individual when the actual time to completion occurs after the expected time to completion.

52. The system of claim 51, wherein the performance rule is modified based on at least one of the realized outcomes comprising at least one of an environmental and an economic condition that negatively impacts an ability of the individual to complete the portion of the task.

53. The system of claim 52, wherein the project processor is configured to automatically track the at least of the environmental and the economic condition.

54. The system of claim 45, wherein the at least one of the realized outcomes comprises an actual cost to complete a portion of a project and the at least one of the expected outcomes comprises an expected cost to complete the portion of the project.

55. The system of claim 53, wherein the first rules comprise a performance rule that increases a performance evaluation value of an individual when the actual cost is below the expected cost, and decreases the performance evaluation value of the individual when the actual cost exceeds the expected cost.

56. The system of claim 55, wherein the performance rule is modified based on at least one of the realized outcomes comprising an environmental or economic condition that negatively impacts an ability of the individual to complete the portion of the task.

57. The system of claim 56, wherein the project processor is configured to automatically track the environmental or economic condition.

58. The system of claim 45, wherein the second rules comprise an expected outcome rule that increases an expected time to completion or an expected cost of a portion of a project when a performance evaluation value of an individual is decreased.

59. The system of claim 45, wherein the third rules comprise an expected outcome rule that increases an expected time to completion of a task of a project when a realized time to completion of a previous task of the project exceeds an expected time to completion of the previous task.

60. The system of claim 44, wherein the profile for each individual further comprises indicators for at least one professional parameter and indicators for at least one character parameter.

61. The system of claim 44, wherein the information for each project further comprises indicators for at least one professional criterion and indicators for at least one character criterion.

62. A method of managing a project in a project management system, the project management system comprising (i) a people database storing profiles of individuals, wherein the profile for each individual comprises indicators for:

an employment history of the individual, a work position held by the individual, a type of work performed by the individual, a skill level of the individual, an evaluation of performance by the individual on any project, or portion thereof, completed by the individual, and an availability of the individual for a project, and (ii) a project database storing information about projects, wherein the information for each project comprises indicators for (a) information on persons needed to complete the project, wherein the information on each person includes at least one of;

a type of work to be performed by the person, a required skill level of the person, and an amount of time for the person to perform on the project, (b) expected outcomes of the project, (c) realized outcomes of the project, after they are realized, and (d) a cost of at least a portion of the project, the method comprising;

identifying individuals to work on a project by comparing the profiles of the individuals stored in the people database with the information for the project stored in the project database;

modifying a performance evaluation based on feedback from at least one of the realized outcomes in relation to at least one of the expected outcomes;

modifying at least one of the expected outcomes based on feedback from at least one of the profiles; and

modifying at least one of the expected outcomes based on feedback from at least one of the realized outcomes.

63. The method of claim 62, further comprising:

displaying a project template on a graphical user interface for the first project;

entering parameter values into fields of the project template based on inputs from a user, the parameter values including;

(a) information on at least one person needed to complete the first project;

(b) expected outcomes of the first project; and

(c) a cost of at least a portion of the first project; and

displaying at least one of the parameter values entered into the project template on the graphical user interface for a subsequent project.

64. The method of claim 62, wherein identifying individuals to work on a project is performed by comparing at least one professional parameter of the individuals stored in the people database with at least one professional criterion for the project stored in the project database.

65. The method of claim 62, wherein identifying individuals to work on a project is performed by comparing at least one character parameter of the individuals stored in the people database with at least one character criterion for the project stored in the project database.

66. The method of claim 62, further comprising:

(a) modifying, by a processor, the performance evaluation based on first rules and the feedback from the at least one of the realized outcomes in relation to the at least one of the expected outcomes;

(b) modifying, by a processor, the at least one of the expected outcomes based on second rules and the feedback from the at least one of the profiles; and

(c) modifying, by a processor, the at least one of the expected outcomes based on third rules and the feedback from the at least one of the realized outcomes.

67. A method of managing a project in a project management system, comprising:

identifying, by a processor, individuals to work on a project by comparing profiles of individuals stored in a people database with information for projects stored in a project database;

wherein the information for each project comprises indicators for (a) information on persons needed to complete the project, wherein the information on each person includes at least one of;

a type of work to be performed by the person, a required skill level of the person, and an amount of time for the person to perform on the project, (b) expected outcomes of the project, (c) realized outcomes of the project, after they are realized, and (d) a cost of at least a portion of the project;

modifying, by a processor, a performance evaluation based on feedback from at least one of the realized outcomes in relation to at least one of the expected outcomes;

modifying, by a processor, at least one of the expected outcomes based on feedback from at least one of the profiles; and

modifying, by a processor, at least one of the expected outcomes based on feedback from at least one of the realized outcomes;

wherein the profile for each individual comprises indicators for;

an employment history of the individual, a work position held by the individual, a type of work performed by the individual, a skill level of the individual, an evaluation of performance by the individual on any project, or portion thereof, completed by the individual, and an availability of the individual for a project.

68. The method of claim 67, further comprising:

displaying a project template on a graphical user interface for the first project;

entering parameter values into fields of the project template based on inputs from a user, the parameter values including;

(a) information on at least one person needed to complete the first project;

(b) expected outcomes of the first project; and

(c) a cost of at least a portion of the first project; and

displaying at least one of the parameter values entered into the project template on the graphical user interface for a subsequent project.

69. The method of claim 67, wherein identifying individuals to work on a project is performed by comparing at least one professional parameter of the individuals stored in the people database with at least one professional criterion for the project stored in the project database.

70. The method of claim 67, wherein identifying individuals to work on a project is performed by comparing at least one character parameter of the individuals stored in the people database with at least one character criterion for the project stored in the project database.

71. The method of claim 67, further comprising:

(a) modifying, by a processor, the performance evaluation based on first rules and the feedback from the at least one of the realized outcomes in relation to the at least one of the expected outcomes;

(b) modifying, by a processor, the at least one of the expected outcomes based on second rules and the feedback from the at least one of the profiles; and

(c) modifying, by a processor, the at least one of the expected outcomes based on third rules and the feedback from the at least one of the realized outcomes.